And I don't think the fact there are and always will be laws that are unfair means we shouldn't complain about the laws that are unfair. Call me crazy.
I don't disagree with you there, but I pointed it out because as far as "justice" is concerned I don't think most people would insist that consenting adults be arrested for incest. I could be wrong, but I find it more likely we'd just be grossed out. It seemed less about justice/punishment in this case than about accidental committing of the crime/protecting people from that.
I simply think that while discussing the info the article presented (which, admittedly, you say you weren't focused on), the other posters weren't necessarily suggesting that we be unjust. The way I see it, this law has actual reasons for being in place, and I do think most would want to know that they aren't violating it - not to avoid punishment, but because of what the act itself means (physically and mentally).
One Sperm Donor, 150 sons and daughters
09/09/2011 09:13:14 PM
- 841 Views
Back in the 80's we used to call it "Being a Rock Star". *NM*
10/09/2011 12:27:35 AM
- 169 Views
"We?" *NM*
10/09/2011 01:36:16 AM
- 268 Views
It's this cool new term I just came up with. It means "myself and other people."
10/09/2011 01:50:26 AM
- 420 Views
Yet, if they didn't know they were siblings then they wouldn't be bound by the incest taboo.
10/09/2011 03:16:45 AM
- 430 Views
Yes, but the taboo has a rationale behind it.
10/09/2011 08:13:01 AM
- 625 Views
Are people with actually diagnosed genetic defects "allowed" to have children? *NM*
10/09/2011 12:41:56 PM
- 228 Views
yeah they are allowed
10/09/2011 10:22:24 PM
- 514 Views
Of course they are allowed, but why?
11/09/2011 01:38:57 AM
- 538 Views
I see where you are going with this, but
11/09/2011 08:07:45 PM
- 492 Views
Incest is that fragrant smoke, right?
11/09/2011 10:40:28 PM
- 501 Views
Duh.
11/09/2011 11:18:11 PM
- 469 Views
I was just making the point that the incest taboo is a societal construct. Thus...
12/09/2011 05:37:26 AM
- 484 Views