I'm fairly certain there is nothing to worry about
A Deathwatch Guard Send a noteboard - 11/09/2011 02:28:33 AM
First of all, there are the odds of the children ever meeting each other. They're not very high. The odds of them forming a relationship and having kids are even lower. And with only one parent in common, I am pretty certain the genetic effects would be miniscule.
Finally, limiting the number of children a single sperm donor can provide is sensible. Making some kind of organization to keep track of those children to make sure no accident incest occurs is not.
Finally, limiting the number of children a single sperm donor can provide is sensible. Making some kind of organization to keep track of those children to make sure no accident incest occurs is not.
One Sperm Donor, 150 sons and daughters
- 09/09/2011 09:13:14 PM
828 Views
Back in the 80's we used to call it "Being a Rock Star". *NM*
- 10/09/2011 12:27:35 AM
166 Views
"We?" *NM*
- 10/09/2011 01:36:16 AM
263 Views
It's this cool new term I just came up with. It means "myself and other people."
- 10/09/2011 01:50:26 AM
407 Views
Yet, if they didn't know they were siblings then they wouldn't be bound by the incest taboo.
- 10/09/2011 03:16:45 AM
417 Views
Yes, but the taboo has a rationale behind it.
- 10/09/2011 08:13:01 AM
611 Views
Are people with actually diagnosed genetic defects "allowed" to have children? *NM*
- 10/09/2011 12:41:56 PM
223 Views
yeah they are allowed
- 10/09/2011 10:22:24 PM
498 Views
Of course they are allowed, but why?
- 11/09/2011 01:38:57 AM
520 Views
I see where you are going with this, but
- 11/09/2011 08:07:45 PM
477 Views
I was just making the point that the incest taboo is a societal construct. Thus...
- 12/09/2011 05:37:26 AM
475 Views
I'm fairly certain there is nothing to worry about
- 11/09/2011 02:28:33 AM
378 Views