Active Users:1140 Time:22/11/2024 05:49:55 PM
Yes, but the taboo has a rationale behind it. Spriteling Send a noteboard - 10/09/2011 08:13:01 AM
In other words, your horror is the result of the taboo. They would never know or experience that horror.


Any children resulting from a union between two half siblings will have a much higher chance of genetic defects and the like. It's not just horror of siblings sleeping together. There's a medical reason to not allow children to result from that sort of thing.
Reply to message
One Sperm Donor, 150 sons and daughters - 09/09/2011 09:13:14 PM 827 Views
Back in the 80's we used to call it "Being a Rock Star". *NM* - 10/09/2011 12:27:35 AM 165 Views
"We?" *NM* - 10/09/2011 01:36:16 AM 263 Views
It's this cool new term I just came up with. It means "myself and other people." - 10/09/2011 01:50:26 AM 407 Views
Ooo cool! - 10/09/2011 01:59:40 AM 490 Views
I suppose there's no risk of STDs this way - 10/09/2011 02:12:07 AM 376 Views
Yet, if they didn't know they were siblings then they wouldn't be bound by the incest taboo. - 10/09/2011 03:16:45 AM 416 Views
Yes, but the taboo has a rationale behind it. - 10/09/2011 08:13:01 AM 611 Views
Are people with actually diagnosed genetic defects "allowed" to have children? *NM* - 10/09/2011 12:41:56 PM 223 Views
yeah they are allowed - 10/09/2011 10:22:24 PM 498 Views
Of course they are allowed, but why? - 11/09/2011 01:38:57 AM 519 Views
I see where you are going with this, but - 11/09/2011 08:07:45 PM 477 Views
Incest is that fragrant smoke, right? - 11/09/2011 10:40:28 PM 486 Views
Duh. - 11/09/2011 11:18:11 PM 455 Views
I'm fairly certain there is nothing to worry about - 11/09/2011 02:28:33 AM 377 Views

Reply to Message