The world's top ten and worst ten most livable cities
Nate Send a noteboard - 30/08/2011 07:06:50 PM
The Economist's Livibility index for 2011 has been released, listing the top ten most livable cities and the ten least livable cities around the globe.
According to the report they rated the following factors: Stability (including crime rate, terror, civil unrest), Health (including health care and general health indices), Culture & Environment (including climate, corruption, social freedoms, restaurants, services), Education (private and public), and Infrastructure (roads, public transportation, water, housing, telecommunications, etc). You can see a full list of their criteria in the report, linked at the bottom.
This year's list:
Top Ten
1. Melbourne, Australia
2. Vienna, Austria
3. Vancouver, Canada
4. Toronto, Canada
5. Calgary, Canada
6. Sydney, Australia
7. Helsinki, Finland
8. Perth, Australia
9. Adelaide, Australia
10. Auckland, New Zealand
Bottom Ten (from "best" to worst)
1. Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire
2. Tehran, Iran
3. Douala, Cameroon
4. Karachi, Pakistan
5. Tripoli, Libya
6. Algiers, Algeria
7. Lagos, Nigeria
8. Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea
9. Dhaka, Bangladesh
10. Harare, Zimbabwe
I'm happy that three Canadian cities (including my city) are in the top five. I like that Australia scores well too, as that would be my second choice of country to live in.
It should be noted that recent events, such as the Vancouver hockey riots and the rebel war in Libya, are not reflected in this report, so the rankings might change next year. I expect Vancouver will be hurt in the rankings especially. It was #1 in 2010, and dropped two spots due to traffic congestion. I imagine the riot will really take a bite out of their ranking.
Any thoughts on the rankings?
According to the report they rated the following factors: Stability (including crime rate, terror, civil unrest), Health (including health care and general health indices), Culture & Environment (including climate, corruption, social freedoms, restaurants, services), Education (private and public), and Infrastructure (roads, public transportation, water, housing, telecommunications, etc). You can see a full list of their criteria in the report, linked at the bottom.
This year's list:
Top Ten
1. Melbourne, Australia
2. Vienna, Austria
3. Vancouver, Canada
4. Toronto, Canada
5. Calgary, Canada
6. Sydney, Australia
7. Helsinki, Finland
8. Perth, Australia
9. Adelaide, Australia
10. Auckland, New Zealand
Bottom Ten (from "best" to worst)
1. Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire
2. Tehran, Iran
3. Douala, Cameroon
4. Karachi, Pakistan
5. Tripoli, Libya
6. Algiers, Algeria
7. Lagos, Nigeria
8. Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea
9. Dhaka, Bangladesh
10. Harare, Zimbabwe
I'm happy that three Canadian cities (including my city) are in the top five. I like that Australia scores well too, as that would be my second choice of country to live in.
It should be noted that recent events, such as the Vancouver hockey riots and the rebel war in Libya, are not reflected in this report, so the rankings might change next year. I expect Vancouver will be hurt in the rankings especially. It was #1 in 2010, and dropped two spots due to traffic congestion. I imagine the riot will really take a bite out of their ranking.
Any thoughts on the rankings?
Warder to starry_nite
Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
This message last edited by Nate on 30/08/2011 at 07:08:29 PM
The world's top ten and worst ten most livable cities
30/08/2011 07:06:50 PM
- 1275 Views
How do you call towns "cities"?
30/08/2011 08:12:27 PM
- 557 Views
I thought you were going to mention Perth. The rest are clearly cities, if you ask me.
30/08/2011 08:23:33 PM
- 542 Views
Perth has 1.7 million people.
30/08/2011 08:30:26 PM
- 693 Views
A million people isn't a city?
30/08/2011 08:28:20 PM
- 708 Views
Not necessarily.
30/08/2011 10:49:08 PM
- 677 Views
Re: Not necessarily.
30/08/2011 11:56:20 PM
- 615 Views
to meet their definition of best it also seems to help if you have mostly white
31/08/2011 01:52:11 PM
- 567 Views
Have you been to Toronto or Vancouver ?
31/08/2011 04:02:01 PM
- 584 Views
no but I have the internet and they meet the ethnic description I gave
31/08/2011 05:25:40 PM
- 690 Views
Yeah, I'm sorry, but you're fairly off with that one.
31/08/2011 04:52:25 PM
- 660 Views
OK you did see where I included Asians didn't you and I would call less than 2% significant
31/08/2011 05:31:45 PM
- 630 Views
As a comparison ...
30/08/2011 08:37:28 PM
- 737 Views
weather is a factor and three Canadian cities made the top ten?
30/08/2011 09:22:32 PM
- 700 Views
Vancouver at least has a nice climate.
30/08/2011 09:40:31 PM
- 823 Views
yeah there are not vey many US cities I would want to raise kids in
30/08/2011 11:16:52 PM
- 533 Views
Quality health care in the US, really?
31/08/2011 12:27:41 AM
- 654 Views
Also,
31/08/2011 12:53:00 PM
- 678 Views
no it works out that nicely for most people
31/08/2011 01:36:13 PM
- 637 Views
Getting care, getting timely care, getting quality care and paying for it are all different things.
31/08/2011 03:39:30 PM
- 789 Views
tha tis becuase the hospital is run by republicans and they were out to get you *NM*
31/08/2011 07:37:47 PM
- 467 Views
Livability obviously doesn't include "Concentration of Venomous Creatures". *NM*
30/08/2011 11:43:43 PM
- 339 Views
or perhaps Australian cities rank so high because they're so much better than the alternative
30/08/2011 11:58:47 PM
- 643 Views
Actually, the reason our cities are so liveable is because they're built to keep said creatures out
31/08/2011 12:59:01 AM
- 560 Views
How?
31/08/2011 08:20:01 AM
- 531 Views
I can't risk putting the answer on a public forum, the venomous creatures may find out
01/09/2011 07:26:52 AM
- 478 Views
Why no Boston? *NM*
31/08/2011 12:16:28 AM
- 328 Views
Annoyingness of local sports fans was also taken into consideration. *NM*
31/08/2011 12:31:21 AM
- 424 Views
Obviously the study group consists of Yankees fans. Poor, unfortunate souls. *NM*
31/08/2011 12:46:17 AM
- 303 Views
A low population density seems to be a key determinant in these rankings
31/08/2011 12:51:45 AM
- 525 Views
There is an obvious mistake
31/08/2011 03:07:31 AM
- 815 Views