Active Users:1171 Time:22/11/2024 10:47:02 PM
*nod* I don't deny that it's a problem LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 26/08/2011 04:26:56 PM
I think a lot of it is they really do want to help. They really do want to promote diversity. But at the same time, they have that base human urge to be focused on things relevant to them (i.e. what they like/support/are). I think it does create a lot of what you're talking about. The problem with it affecting those higher up instead of those with less influence, I think, is compounded by the difference influences of the left's constituents versus the right's constituents. Unfortunately, I can't really explain why I think that. I'm having problems formulating the thoughts clearly. Perhaps you understand what I'm trying to say and can do so better.

I think both sides would benefit a great deal if they got back to objective party stances like small government vs. large government, or state government vs federal government, instead of "This is what I BELIEVE!!!". It feels a lot like it's become Democrats=Hippie-PETA, Republicans=Old-School Conservative Christian, and where you fall on a spectrum between the two. Obviously that's not exactly how it is, but that's how it feels. And that's just not effective for governing!
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
A fine example of the fuzzy logic of the left - 25/08/2011 06:30:36 PM 1013 Views
Personally I still favor demographic blind subsidies as the best route to meritocracy. - 25/08/2011 08:18:20 PM 597 Views
it works for gender as well - 25/08/2011 09:02:58 PM 610 Views
Sure; insert your demographic here. - 26/08/2011 12:51:48 AM 652 Views
Preferential in possible scholarships but not admissions process according to the article - 25/08/2011 10:26:25 PM 509 Views
What's your point? - 26/08/2011 12:54:41 AM 490 Views
There are colleges that don't allow homosexuals - or men, or women for that matter. - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 595 Views
Alright then, socially unacceptable. - 26/08/2011 01:00:16 AM 626 Views
Ummm, did you read the article? - 25/08/2011 08:40:46 PM 658 Views
Ah, but you are not reading it either - 25/08/2011 08:53:39 PM 675 Views
But that's just a scholarship. - 25/08/2011 09:34:23 PM 634 Views
it is a scholarship program not a admissions program - 25/08/2011 09:12:47 PM 621 Views
I don't really have a problem with this - 25/08/2011 09:03:55 PM 698 Views
I am not arguing that they shouldn't be allowed to do it - 25/08/2011 09:29:54 PM 521 Views
Fair Enough - 25/08/2011 09:41:25 PM 565 Views
their stated motive was to increase diversity - 25/08/2011 10:09:17 PM 689 Views
One of your lines struck me. - 25/08/2011 10:12:32 PM 664 Views
that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 506 Views
That's an interesting point... - 25/08/2011 10:37:37 PM 593 Views
Re: that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:55:29 PM 613 Views
It's also worth noting ... - 25/08/2011 11:00:35 PM 491 Views
Wow what a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM 682 Views
yes to bad none of that address the point I was making which would make your argument a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:40:01 PM 468 Views
No I do not believe they are needed, nor do I believe they should be desired - 25/08/2011 10:47:51 PM 661 Views
so you don't disagree with me or you do? - 25/08/2011 11:47:05 PM 613 Views
Ridiculous. Everyone knows conservatives are incapable of creativity. - 25/08/2011 11:12:10 PM 484 Views
are they going to make students prove they are GLBT? - 25/08/2011 11:36:58 PM 550 Views
I think it's less a failing of the "left"... - 26/08/2011 03:25:42 AM 613 Views
I agree there is a lot of fuzzy logic on the right as well - 26/08/2011 02:41:03 PM 549 Views
*nod* I don't deny that it's a problem - 26/08/2011 04:26:56 PM 662 Views
a question for you... - 26/08/2011 08:08:10 PM 722 Views

Reply to Message