Active Users:1120 Time:22/11/2024 10:25:02 PM
Ah, but you are not reading it either Dark Knight Send a noteboard - 25/08/2011 08:53:39 PM
In general I find that I want to support the left's idea that we should try and help people who are disadvantaged improve their lives but the problem is that to many of their ideas actually make things worse and to often we see things like this where they are picking winners and losers based on who the like. When you look at our countries history it makes sense to want to help a black kid get into college but if you base things on race you ignore the fact that most of the poor in this country are white and can even end up helping rich black kid over a poor white one. Here we have a university wanting to increase diversity by offering scholarships to LGBT students. Is it because there are not enough LGBT students in in liberal arts schools or because this is a group they like and they really don't care about need or diversity and they just use those ideas to sugar coat their bias? If they wanted to actually increase the diversity in their school they would encourage conservatives to go there but I would bet they would shutter at the idea of real diversity of thought being brought into their campus. With this kind of flawed logic from out university it isn't hard to see why we have a growing disregard for the intellectual class in this country. Maybe if they had more intelligence and less ideology they would be held in higher regard.

From what I see, you are saying that this University is doing a bad thing by offering scholarships to LGBT students, in order to increase the diversity of the student body, when instead they should only be offering scholarships to the people that are intellectually above everyone else, regardless of their sexual orientation.

BUT.

The article clearly states that while it seeks to attract diversity through offering the scholarship,
Prospective freshmen and transfer students applying for the 2012 fall semester will become the first group of applicants to check “yes,” “no” or “prefer not to answer.” Their answers will not play a role in the admissions process.

It seems like that the scholarship will only be given to people that are intellectually be capable of doing the work in any case. They are merely offering the scholarship to attract more LGBT applicants.


You should read further:

A “yes” answer could put students in line to qualify for a scholarship worth one-third of tuition at the private, liberal arts school affiliated with the United Church of Christ, said Rold.
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
Reply to message
A fine example of the fuzzy logic of the left - 25/08/2011 06:30:36 PM 1012 Views
Personally I still favor demographic blind subsidies as the best route to meritocracy. - 25/08/2011 08:18:20 PM 597 Views
it works for gender as well - 25/08/2011 09:02:58 PM 609 Views
Sure; insert your demographic here. - 26/08/2011 12:51:48 AM 652 Views
Preferential in possible scholarships but not admissions process according to the article - 25/08/2011 10:26:25 PM 509 Views
What's your point? - 26/08/2011 12:54:41 AM 490 Views
There are colleges that don't allow homosexuals - or men, or women for that matter. - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 594 Views
Alright then, socially unacceptable. - 26/08/2011 01:00:16 AM 625 Views
Ummm, did you read the article? - 25/08/2011 08:40:46 PM 658 Views
Ah, but you are not reading it either - 25/08/2011 08:53:39 PM 675 Views
But that's just a scholarship. - 25/08/2011 09:34:23 PM 634 Views
it is a scholarship program not a admissions program - 25/08/2011 09:12:47 PM 621 Views
I don't really have a problem with this - 25/08/2011 09:03:55 PM 698 Views
I am not arguing that they shouldn't be allowed to do it - 25/08/2011 09:29:54 PM 521 Views
Fair Enough - 25/08/2011 09:41:25 PM 565 Views
their stated motive was to increase diversity - 25/08/2011 10:09:17 PM 688 Views
One of your lines struck me. - 25/08/2011 10:12:32 PM 664 Views
that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 506 Views
That's an interesting point... - 25/08/2011 10:37:37 PM 593 Views
Re: that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:55:29 PM 613 Views
It's also worth noting ... - 25/08/2011 11:00:35 PM 491 Views
Wow what a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM 682 Views
yes to bad none of that address the point I was making which would make your argument a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:40:01 PM 468 Views
No I do not believe they are needed, nor do I believe they should be desired - 25/08/2011 10:47:51 PM 661 Views
so you don't disagree with me or you do? - 25/08/2011 11:47:05 PM 613 Views
Ridiculous. Everyone knows conservatives are incapable of creativity. - 25/08/2011 11:12:10 PM 484 Views
are they going to make students prove they are GLBT? - 25/08/2011 11:36:58 PM 550 Views
I think it's less a failing of the "left"... - 26/08/2011 03:25:42 AM 613 Views
I agree there is a lot of fuzzy logic on the right as well - 26/08/2011 02:41:03 PM 549 Views
*nod* I don't deny that it's a problem - 26/08/2011 04:26:56 PM 661 Views
a question for you... - 26/08/2011 08:08:10 PM 722 Views

Reply to Message