When you have a health, should you not need insurance to protect it, to make sure that no one is caught with their finances and livelihood ruined after a health accident?
Health insurance demonstrably does not do this in the US. While medical expenses are the biggest cause of bankruptcy, the majority of people declaring bankruptcy due to medical expenses do have health insurance.
Would that be because people who don't have health insurance try their best to avoid expensive treatments even when they are required?
My point was simply that having health insurance doesn't guarantee that a medical problem won't ruin somebody's financial situation and/or livelihood.
If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
US Court of Appeals - ObamaCare is Unconstitutional! 
- 12/08/2011 09:04:30 PM
722 Views
- 12/08/2011 09:04:30 PM
722 Views
Does America have mandatory car insurance?
- 12/08/2011 09:42:17 PM
581 Views
It's determined by the state, but in most states, yes.
- 12/08/2011 10:05:39 PM
483 Views
Also
- 12/08/2011 10:11:34 PM
347 Views
Re: Also
- 12/08/2011 10:20:47 PM
462 Views
I'm sure that's at least part of it.
- 13/08/2011 01:09:04 AM
340 Views
it isn't the same but even it was it wouldn't matter because of the tenth amendment
- 12/08/2011 11:42:59 PM
443 Views
Sort of a meaningless decision either way
- 12/08/2011 10:54:00 PM
324 Views
Kennedy has a clear record of restricting the use of the commerce clause argument....
- 13/08/2011 12:08:43 AM
327 Views
Re: Kennedy has a clear record of restricting the use of the commerce clause argument....
- 13/08/2011 12:10:33 AM
324 Views