we can't really know ahead of time what makes a specific trait benefical in that environment
LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 09/08/2011 06:16:02 PM
That's why I didn't give any examples. It's easy to ID these traits in hindsight, but I think it'd be presumptuous of me to make them in advance.
I hope I didn't muddy the waters too much by my use of "to" instead of "in". That was an error on my part.
if it doesn't make sense after amending that error in my statements, here's kind of what I mean:
X trait prevails under a selection pressure. For whatever reason, X trait allows for a greater survival of the species, through whatever means, under that selection pressure it's important to remember that that same trait may not be beneficial/selected for under another pressure. An example here might be sickle cell anemia. In an environment with a lot of malaria, sickle cell anemia decreases infection, outweighing the costs of the actual disorder. Outside of the environment, it's just a blood disorder and no longer beneficial. Thus, it is unsurprising that sickle cell anemia is only notably prevalent in regions where there is a great deal of malaria (or inhabited by people who come from such regions), and elsewhere, it is rare.
I am trying not to give specific examples, because I feel like I can't pick good ones to illustrate my point sufficiently. I'm not sure the latter one does either.
Does that make what I was trying to say more clear?
I hope I didn't muddy the waters too much by my use of "to" instead of "in". That was an error on my part.
if it doesn't make sense after amending that error in my statements, here's kind of what I mean:
X trait prevails under a selection pressure. For whatever reason, X trait allows for a greater survival of the species, through whatever means, under that selection pressure it's important to remember that that same trait may not be beneficial/selected for under another pressure. An example here might be sickle cell anemia. In an environment with a lot of malaria, sickle cell anemia decreases infection, outweighing the costs of the actual disorder. Outside of the environment, it's just a blood disorder and no longer beneficial. Thus, it is unsurprising that sickle cell anemia is only notably prevalent in regions where there is a great deal of malaria (or inhabited by people who come from such regions), and elsewhere, it is rare.
I am trying not to give specific examples, because I feel like I can't pick good ones to illustrate my point sufficiently. I'm not sure the latter one does either.
Does that make what I was trying to say more clear?
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
This message last edited by LadyLorraine on 09/08/2011 at 06:24:10 PM
Natural selection
06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM
- 1080 Views
selection for suitability
06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM
- 728 Views
Thanks for your responce
06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
- 844 Views

I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it:
06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM
- 788 Views
Just a question
06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM
- 771 Views
Yes it can
06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM
- 647 Views
But how?
06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM
- 844 Views
Re: Just a question
06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM
- 865 Views
I'm not sure I understand you
06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM
- 769 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies.
06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM
- 789 Views
Then it is still a tautology
06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM
- 799 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations.
06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM
- 901 Views
Maybe...
07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM
- 754 Views
I'm more inclined toward his logic, but possibly toward your conclusions.
09/08/2011 12:45:46 AM
- 834 Views
we can't really know ahead of time what makes a specific trait benefical in that environment
09/08/2011 06:16:02 PM
- 892 Views
As I understand it
06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM
- 719 Views
Better...
06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM
- 700 Views
Did you perhaps mean "beneficial in the environment" rather than "beneficial to the environment"?
06/08/2011 06:34:44 PM
- 826 Views
yes. I did not really phrase that very clearly. *NM*
09/08/2011 06:14:11 PM
- 330 Views
No biggy; from what Bram said, I underestimated how well you were understood anyway.
09/08/2011 06:45:16 PM
- 767 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that
06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM
- 800 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify...
06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM
- 824 Views
The questions go deeper
06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM
- 816 Views
Re: The questions go deeper
06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM
- 805 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question.
06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM
- 826 Views
How many equation's has Moraine screwed up?
*NM*
06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
- 340 Views


100% I think Moriaine is a very beneficial trait that contributes a lot to the RAFO pool
*NM*
06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
- 363 Views


Re: Natural selection
07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
- 800 Views
Thanks a lot
07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM
- 945 Views
2 things
07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
- 705 Views
Re: 2 things
07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM
- 923 Views
Re: 2 things
07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM
- 737 Views
My best guess
07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM
- 769 Views
Re: My best guess
07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM
- 712 Views
Re: My best guess
07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM
- 866 Views