So in other words you just ignore the actaull words and read it say what you want it to say *NM*
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 09/08/2011 02:07:57 PM
zero revenue increases and 100% spending cut would be a mix covered in their statement and I thin it is safe to assume they are smart enough to know that. I personally think there will and should be some revenue increases and the dems will have all the leverage to get them in December next year. If they let them expire then the tax increase would come before most of the spending cuts hit. One of the reasons the tea party scares the crap out of the political class is they seem to be willing to risk reelection to push their agenda. Doesn't look like the S&P believes the dems will do the same.
A pure and unadulterated form one thing and one thing only is in no sense a "mix" of that thing and another. The most generous way to read S&Ps statement is that they think Republicans insane and Democrats incompetent; there's plenty of evidence for both, so that's probably also the most generous way to read Washingtons reality (and I use the term very loosely).
By the way agreeing that the dems are spineless kind of undermines your argument that it is all the republicans fault. The republicans at least are doing what they believe is in the best interest of the country. If the dems are signing on to things they don't think will help the country because they are spineless cravens (yes I have been reading Martin) then I would say they are more at fault and should be despised by both sides of the political spectrum.
I have no idea who Martin is, but I'd say that's a fair assessment. The reason I and a lot of other people chose Obama over Hillary during the primaries is that he presented himself as an intelligent, charismatic and convincing old school liberal. That was a welcome and long overdue alternative to the Republican Lite, Third Way triangulation focus group BS the Clintons brought to Washington and claimed Bills two terms vindicated as the great white hope of Democrats who'd been getting killed in Presidential politics (never mind that Clinton had Perot polling 19% of the 1992 vote and 10% of the 1996 vote, mostly from conservatives and libertarians who wouldn't touch Clinton with a ten foot pole). Unfortunately, it was also a load of crap; after explicitly stating he wasn't on board with the Clintons Democratic Leadership Council during the primaries, he rapidly embraced it once elected. Basically, he pulled a McCain: Suck up to the base to get nominated, then swing to the center. The difference is Obama waited until the INAUGURATION to swing to the center, which means he campaigned on leftism he's never even tried to deliver. Like I say, cowardice is the GENEROUS explanation for that; the rank cynicism and corruption of two decades of Democratic leadership is the far more likely cause.
It's kind of a good news, bad news deal for folks like you: Whoever the two party system elects your craving for what Bush 41 rightly called "voodoo economics" will continue to be satisfied. You can either cheer for the Republicans responsible or boo the Democrats responsible, but your policy goals will be achieved. The bad news is that it will keep degrading Americas strategic, diplomatic and economic position in the world and turn us into a second class world power full of unemployed, starving, ignorant and sickly citizens while China takes our place as the leading producer of both guns AND butter. At least you can continue taking cold comfort in your indefatigable ability to blame that on the policies present in Democratic RHETORIC, but nowhere in the policies of either party. Personally, I think an American public that realizes the problem, wants something better and can't find anything about Democrats OR Republicans in the Constitution will go a different way. I just hope it's a peaceful political way.
US Credit Rate Downgraded - Obama should resign.....
06/08/2011 04:12:48 AM
- 1331 Views
Que tonterías.
06/08/2011 04:23:49 AM
- 858 Views
Really?
06/08/2011 05:05:48 AM
- 912 Views
Leaders have to lead.....
06/08/2011 05:18:21 AM
- 735 Views
Cuts aren't up to him, though.
06/08/2011 05:37:50 AM
- 783 Views
Yeah, sure, the President has no say or control.....good grief..... *NM*
06/08/2011 06:13:49 AM
- 445 Views
S&P didn't demand cuts, they demanded fiscal responsibility.
06/08/2011 03:18:10 PM
- 1014 Views
and haters gotta hate..... *NM*
06/08/2011 05:49:25 AM
- 427 Views
I admit it, I hate what Obama is doing to our country..... *NM*
06/08/2011 06:12:39 AM
- 438 Views
you, it was the tea party republicans that caused this
06/08/2011 05:57:16 AM
- 863 Views
As ever your disinterest in facts seems to be central to your posting.
06/08/2011 11:34:20 AM
- 826 Views
Which would be less annoying if so much of Congress didn't suffer from the same delusions.
06/08/2011 03:48:04 PM
- 750 Views
Does Timmy G play sax like his brother Kenny? *NM*
06/08/2011 01:11:17 PM
- 425 Views
Fun fact - I dated in HS Kenny G's niece.....
06/08/2011 03:13:52 PM
- 728 Views
S&P specifically cited GOP refusal to raise taxes among their reasons.
06/08/2011 03:10:22 PM
- 897 Views
Of course one could just read the actual S&P report
06/08/2011 04:01:07 PM
- 898 Views
Sure.
06/08/2011 04:53:47 PM
- 906 Views
Right, ABC new's summary of the report is not the report
06/08/2011 07:02:46 PM
- 1198 Views
Link works, but I'm not sure why you think it refutes snoops assessment or mine.
06/08/2011 08:35:10 PM
- 997 Views
It doesn't refute it, it just isn't this simple distillation you're offering
06/08/2011 09:23:33 PM
- 827 Views
It's more than half a sentence; I quoted several paragraphs.
06/08/2011 09:56:31 PM
- 714 Views
Well yes, after I gave you the report, I think I'm pretty obviously refering to before that
06/08/2011 11:02:17 PM
- 722 Views
Before that I was referring to the paragraphs quoted in the ABC report.
07/08/2011 01:21:18 AM
- 1126 Views
not really
06/08/2011 10:15:32 PM
- 789 Views
"the mix of spending and revenue measures"
06/08/2011 10:23:06 PM
- 854 Views
So you read the statement that they take no posistion as they take the dem position?
07/08/2011 04:51:58 AM
- 858 Views
I read a "mix" to be a mix.
09/08/2011 12:14:35 AM
- 766 Views
So in other words you just ignore the actaull words and read it say what you want it to say *NM*
09/08/2011 02:07:57 PM
- 488 Views
A mix of something and nothing is impossible; one thing is one thing, not a mix.
09/08/2011 04:56:00 PM
- 946 Views
US politicians are too busy fighting over who gets to play the fiddle. *NM*
06/08/2011 05:53:32 PM
- 441 Views
would him resigning really help?
07/08/2011 10:24:00 AM
- 823 Views
not as long as he has the high functioning moron Joe Biden as VP.
08/08/2011 12:34:32 AM
- 810 Views
In reality, its Congress (BOTH parties) AND the President who are to blame.
08/08/2011 01:59:13 AM
- 828 Views
40% is not a small tax increase and a small spending cut
09/08/2011 04:20:28 AM
- 708 Views
Why are people making a deal about the debt ceiling increase?
09/08/2011 03:42:13 PM
- 746 Views
Because, when you get down to it, the debt ceilings very existence was always a political threat.
09/08/2011 05:02:12 PM
- 718 Views