Well, I started reading Darwin, but I got distracted after a few pages (I usually have about half a douzen books I'm reading at the same time and sometimes one slips through
)
Since you are more of an expert, I'll take your word on this newest Dawkins book and give him a second chance once I get around to it.
As for other books, I see Gould's name everywhere, what would be a good place to start with his view on things?
And Furuyma, Maynard Smith and Ruse (most of what I know about them is a bit outdated because I only know them from footnotes), are they any good? Some of their works have... challenging titles.

Since you are more of an expert, I'll take your word on this newest Dawkins book and give him a second chance once I get around to it.
As for other books, I see Gould's name everywhere, what would be a good place to start with his view on things?
And Furuyma, Maynard Smith and Ruse (most of what I know about them is a bit outdated because I only know them from footnotes), are they any good? Some of their works have... challenging titles.
Natural selection
06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM
- 1142 Views
selection for suitability
06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM
- 780 Views
Thanks for your responce
06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
- 894 Views

I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it:
06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM
- 846 Views
Just a question
06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM
- 853 Views
Yes it can
06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM
- 707 Views
But how?
06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM
- 907 Views
Re: Just a question
06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM
- 929 Views
I'm not sure I understand you
06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM
- 827 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies.
06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM
- 850 Views
Then it is still a tautology
06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM
- 859 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations.
06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM
- 956 Views
Maybe...
07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM
- 809 Views
I'm more inclined toward his logic, but possibly toward your conclusions.
09/08/2011 12:45:46 AM
- 895 Views
we can't really know ahead of time what makes a specific trait benefical in that environment
09/08/2011 06:16:02 PM
- 949 Views
As I understand it
06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM
- 773 Views
Better...
06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM
- 762 Views
Did you perhaps mean "beneficial in the environment" rather than "beneficial to the environment"?
06/08/2011 06:34:44 PM
- 892 Views
yes. I did not really phrase that very clearly. *NM*
09/08/2011 06:14:11 PM
- 355 Views
No biggy; from what Bram said, I underestimated how well you were understood anyway.
09/08/2011 06:45:16 PM
- 821 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that
06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM
- 847 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify...
06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM
- 877 Views
The questions go deeper
06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM
- 894 Views
Re: The questions go deeper
06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM
- 857 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question.
06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM
- 889 Views
How many equation's has Moraine screwed up?
*NM*
06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
- 364 Views


100% I think Moriaine is a very beneficial trait that contributes a lot to the RAFO pool
*NM*
06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
- 389 Views


Re: Natural selection
07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
- 867 Views
Thanks a lot
07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM
- 1000 Views
2 things
07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
- 760 Views
Re: 2 things
07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM
- 978 Views
Re: 2 things
07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM
- 799 Views
My best guess
07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM
- 847 Views
Re: My best guess
07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM
- 774 Views
Re: My best guess
07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM
- 934 Views
Re: My best guess
07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM
- 785 Views
Re: My best guess
07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM
- 900 Views