Well, I started reading Darwin, but I got distracted after a few pages (I usually have about half a douzen books I'm reading at the same time and sometimes one slips through
)
Since you are more of an expert, I'll take your word on this newest Dawkins book and give him a second chance once I get around to it.
As for other books, I see Gould's name everywhere, what would be a good place to start with his view on things?
And Furuyma, Maynard Smith and Ruse (most of what I know about them is a bit outdated because I only know them from footnotes), are they any good? Some of their works have... challenging titles.
)Since you are more of an expert, I'll take your word on this newest Dawkins book and give him a second chance once I get around to it.
As for other books, I see Gould's name everywhere, what would be a good place to start with his view on things?
And Furuyma, Maynard Smith and Ruse (most of what I know about them is a bit outdated because I only know them from footnotes), are they any good? Some of their works have... challenging titles.
Natural selection
- 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM
1243 Views
selection for suitability
- 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM
886 Views
Thanks for your responce
- 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
1008 Views
- 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
1008 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it:
- 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM
963 Views
Just a question
- 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM
968 Views
Yes it can
- 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM
809 Views
But how?
- 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM
1028 Views
Re: Just a question
- 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM
1056 Views
I'm not sure I understand you
- 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM
956 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies.
- 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM
991 Views
Then it is still a tautology
- 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM
1004 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations.
- 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM
1067 Views
Maybe...
- 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM
938 Views
I'm more inclined toward his logic, but possibly toward your conclusions.
- 09/08/2011 12:45:46 AM
998 Views
we can't really know ahead of time what makes a specific trait benefical in that environment
- 09/08/2011 06:16:02 PM
1055 Views
As I understand it
- 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM
885 Views
Better...
- 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM
879 Views
Did you perhaps mean "beneficial in the environment" rather than "beneficial to the environment"?
- 06/08/2011 06:34:44 PM
998 Views
yes. I did not really phrase that very clearly. *NM*
- 09/08/2011 06:14:11 PM
397 Views
No biggy; from what Bram said, I underestimated how well you were understood anyway.
- 09/08/2011 06:45:16 PM
926 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that
- 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM
978 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify...
- 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM
981 Views
The questions go deeper
- 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM
1014 Views
Re: The questions go deeper
- 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM
989 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question.
- 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM
1020 Views
How many equation's has Moraine screwed up?
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
415 Views
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
415 Views
100% I think Moriaine is a very beneficial trait that contributes a lot to the RAFO pool
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
444 Views
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
444 Views
Re: Natural selection
- 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
986 Views
Thanks a lot
- 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM
1115 Views
2 things
- 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
861 Views
Re: 2 things
- 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM
1086 Views
Re: 2 things
- 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM
918 Views
My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM
977 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM
886 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM
1038 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM
919 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM
1010 Views
