Well, I started reading Darwin, but I got distracted after a few pages (I usually have about half a douzen books I'm reading at the same time and sometimes one slips through
)
Since you are more of an expert, I'll take your word on this newest Dawkins book and give him a second chance once I get around to it.
As for other books, I see Gould's name everywhere, what would be a good place to start with his view on things?
And Furuyma, Maynard Smith and Ruse (most of what I know about them is a bit outdated because I only know them from footnotes), are they any good? Some of their works have... challenging titles.

Since you are more of an expert, I'll take your word on this newest Dawkins book and give him a second chance once I get around to it.
As for other books, I see Gould's name everywhere, what would be a good place to start with his view on things?
And Furuyma, Maynard Smith and Ruse (most of what I know about them is a bit outdated because I only know them from footnotes), are they any good? Some of their works have... challenging titles.
Natural selection
06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM
- 1106 Views
selection for suitability
06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM
- 752 Views
Thanks for your responce
06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
- 865 Views

I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it:
06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM
- 811 Views
Just a question
06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM
- 796 Views
Yes it can
06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM
- 670 Views
But how?
06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM
- 866 Views
Re: Just a question
06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM
- 891 Views
I'm not sure I understand you
06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM
- 795 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies.
06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM
- 813 Views
Then it is still a tautology
06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM
- 826 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations.
06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM
- 926 Views
Maybe...
07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM
- 775 Views
I'm more inclined toward his logic, but possibly toward your conclusions.
09/08/2011 12:45:46 AM
- 857 Views
we can't really know ahead of time what makes a specific trait benefical in that environment
09/08/2011 06:16:02 PM
- 917 Views
As I understand it
06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM
- 742 Views
Better...
06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM
- 725 Views
Did you perhaps mean "beneficial in the environment" rather than "beneficial to the environment"?
06/08/2011 06:34:44 PM
- 853 Views
yes. I did not really phrase that very clearly. *NM*
09/08/2011 06:14:11 PM
- 339 Views
No biggy; from what Bram said, I underestimated how well you were understood anyway.
09/08/2011 06:45:16 PM
- 788 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that
06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM
- 820 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify...
06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM
- 842 Views
The questions go deeper
06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM
- 841 Views
Re: The questions go deeper
06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM
- 827 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question.
06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM
- 847 Views
How many equation's has Moraine screwed up?
*NM*
06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
- 351 Views


100% I think Moriaine is a very beneficial trait that contributes a lot to the RAFO pool
*NM*
06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
- 374 Views


Re: Natural selection
07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
- 828 Views
Thanks a lot
07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM
- 971 Views
2 things
07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
- 730 Views
Re: 2 things
07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM
- 945 Views
Re: 2 things
07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM
- 765 Views
My best guess
07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM
- 808 Views
Re: My best guess
07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM
- 739 Views
Re: My best guess
07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM
- 895 Views
Re: My best guess
07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM
- 739 Views
Re: My best guess
07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM
- 860 Views