Well, I started reading Darwin, but I got distracted after a few pages (I usually have about half a douzen books I'm reading at the same time and sometimes one slips through )
Since you are more of an expert, I'll take your word on this newest Dawkins book and give him a second chance once I get around to it.
As for other books, I see Gould's name everywhere, what would be a good place to start with his view on things?
And Furuyma, Maynard Smith and Ruse (most of what I know about them is a bit outdated because I only know them from footnotes), are they any good? Some of their works have... challenging titles.
Since you are more of an expert, I'll take your word on this newest Dawkins book and give him a second chance once I get around to it.
As for other books, I see Gould's name everywhere, what would be a good place to start with his view on things?
And Furuyma, Maynard Smith and Ruse (most of what I know about them is a bit outdated because I only know them from footnotes), are they any good? Some of their works have... challenging titles.
Natural selection
06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM
- 979 Views
selection for suitability
06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM
- 631 Views
Thanks for your responce
06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
- 746 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it:
06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM
- 676 Views
Just a question
06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM
- 679 Views
Yes it can
06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM
- 555 Views
But how?
06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM
- 749 Views
Re: Just a question
06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM
- 767 Views
I'm not sure I understand you
06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM
- 655 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies.
06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM
- 681 Views
Then it is still a tautology
06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM
- 692 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations.
06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM
- 787 Views
Maybe...
07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM
- 639 Views
I'm more inclined toward his logic, but possibly toward your conclusions.
09/08/2011 12:45:46 AM
- 728 Views
we can't really know ahead of time what makes a specific trait benefical in that environment
09/08/2011 06:16:02 PM
- 791 Views
As I understand it
06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM
- 621 Views
Better...
06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM
- 606 Views
Did you perhaps mean "beneficial in the environment" rather than "beneficial to the environment"?
06/08/2011 06:34:44 PM
- 742 Views
yes. I did not really phrase that very clearly. *NM*
09/08/2011 06:14:11 PM
- 292 Views
No biggy; from what Bram said, I underestimated how well you were understood anyway.
09/08/2011 06:45:16 PM
- 671 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that
06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM
- 690 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify...
06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM
- 728 Views
The questions go deeper
06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM
- 724 Views
Re: The questions go deeper
06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM
- 699 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question.
06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM
- 731 Views
How many equation's has Moraine screwed up? *NM*
06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
- 302 Views
100% I think Moriaine is a very beneficial trait that contributes a lot to the RAFO pool *NM*
06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
- 322 Views
Re: Natural selection
07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
- 698 Views
Thanks a lot
07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM
- 839 Views
2 things
07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
- 618 Views
Re: 2 things
07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM
- 827 Views
Re: 2 things
07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM
- 643 Views
My best guess
07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM
- 676 Views
Re: My best guess
07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM
- 615 Views
Re: My best guess
07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM
- 763 Views
Re: My best guess
07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM
- 611 Views
Re: My best guess
07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM
- 730 Views