Well, I started reading Darwin, but I got distracted after a few pages (I usually have about half a douzen books I'm reading at the same time and sometimes one slips through )
Since you are more of an expert, I'll take your word on this newest Dawkins book and give him a second chance once I get around to it.
As for other books, I see Gould's name everywhere, what would be a good place to start with his view on things?
And Furuyma, Maynard Smith and Ruse (most of what I know about them is a bit outdated because I only know them from footnotes), are they any good? Some of their works have... challenging titles.
Since you are more of an expert, I'll take your word on this newest Dawkins book and give him a second chance once I get around to it.
As for other books, I see Gould's name everywhere, what would be a good place to start with his view on things?
And Furuyma, Maynard Smith and Ruse (most of what I know about them is a bit outdated because I only know them from footnotes), are they any good? Some of their works have... challenging titles.
Natural selection
06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM
- 992 Views
selection for suitability
06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM
- 642 Views
Thanks for your responce
06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
- 762 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it:
06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM
- 686 Views
Just a question
06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM
- 690 Views
Yes it can
06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM
- 571 Views
But how?
06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM
- 758 Views
Re: Just a question
06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM
- 779 Views
I'm not sure I understand you
06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM
- 668 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies.
06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM
- 697 Views
Then it is still a tautology
06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM
- 702 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations.
06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM
- 799 Views
Maybe...
07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM
- 657 Views
I'm more inclined toward his logic, but possibly toward your conclusions.
09/08/2011 12:45:46 AM
- 740 Views
we can't really know ahead of time what makes a specific trait benefical in that environment
09/08/2011 06:16:02 PM
- 813 Views
As I understand it
06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM
- 633 Views
Better...
06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM
- 615 Views
Did you perhaps mean "beneficial in the environment" rather than "beneficial to the environment"?
06/08/2011 06:34:44 PM
- 754 Views
yes. I did not really phrase that very clearly. *NM*
09/08/2011 06:14:11 PM
- 298 Views
No biggy; from what Bram said, I underestimated how well you were understood anyway.
09/08/2011 06:45:16 PM
- 683 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that
06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM
- 703 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify...
06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM
- 736 Views
The questions go deeper
06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM
- 737 Views
Re: The questions go deeper
06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM
- 712 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question.
06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM
- 743 Views
How many equation's has Moraine screwed up? *NM*
06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
- 306 Views
100% I think Moriaine is a very beneficial trait that contributes a lot to the RAFO pool *NM*
06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
- 329 Views
Re: Natural selection
07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
- 714 Views
Thanks a lot
07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM
- 858 Views
2 things
07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
- 632 Views
Re: 2 things
07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM
- 843 Views
Re: 2 things
07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM
- 655 Views
My best guess
07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM
- 691 Views
Re: My best guess
07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM
- 625 Views
Re: My best guess
07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM
- 777 Views
Re: My best guess
07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM
- 626 Views
Re: My best guess
07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM
- 744 Views