So are you going to tell us who this mystery author is? I would like to know.
I don’t see how observation of NS does not imply developed from NS. If a process is ongoing and works then one can assume it has always worked in that manner, therefore speciation from NS is the most viable and logical reasoning for the species which exist in the world.
I also don’t see how NS is simple. Conceptually, yes it is simple but to understand the hows and whys of NS it requires more than a simple understanding of biology. There are many different processes which contribute to NS, each process requiring knowledge of biology, chemistry and physics. Each process clarifies the picture, but even missing one of these points will result in a failure to truly understand how NS works.
I would also suggest reading, “The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution” by Richard Dawkins. He can get a little preachy at times but it very clearly outlines the processes involved in evolution, why they work and how they have been tested, including NS.
I don’t see how observation of NS does not imply developed from NS. If a process is ongoing and works then one can assume it has always worked in that manner, therefore speciation from NS is the most viable and logical reasoning for the species which exist in the world.
I also don’t see how NS is simple. Conceptually, yes it is simple but to understand the hows and whys of NS it requires more than a simple understanding of biology. There are many different processes which contribute to NS, each process requiring knowledge of biology, chemistry and physics. Each process clarifies the picture, but even missing one of these points will result in a failure to truly understand how NS works.
I would also suggest reading, “The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution” by Richard Dawkins. He can get a little preachy at times but it very clearly outlines the processes involved in evolution, why they work and how they have been tested, including NS.
Natural selection
06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM
- 1057 Views
selection for suitability
06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM
- 700 Views
Thanks for your responce
06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
- 820 Views
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25d89/25d8901e4ef9e35dd4feebe8c133f5ddba30814d" alt=""
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it:
06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM
- 754 Views
Just a question
06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM
- 745 Views
Yes it can
06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM
- 621 Views
But how?
06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM
- 818 Views
Re: Just a question
06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM
- 839 Views
I'm not sure I understand you
06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM
- 734 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies.
06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM
- 753 Views
Then it is still a tautology
06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM
- 766 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations.
06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM
- 867 Views
Maybe...
07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM
- 723 Views
I'm more inclined toward his logic, but possibly toward your conclusions.
09/08/2011 12:45:46 AM
- 808 Views
we can't really know ahead of time what makes a specific trait benefical in that environment
09/08/2011 06:16:02 PM
- 871 Views
As I understand it
06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM
- 689 Views
Better...
06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM
- 678 Views
Did you perhaps mean "beneficial in the environment" rather than "beneficial to the environment"?
06/08/2011 06:34:44 PM
- 802 Views
yes. I did not really phrase that very clearly. *NM*
09/08/2011 06:14:11 PM
- 322 Views
No biggy; from what Bram said, I underestimated how well you were understood anyway.
09/08/2011 06:45:16 PM
- 742 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that
06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM
- 766 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify...
06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM
- 791 Views
The questions go deeper
06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM
- 790 Views
Re: The questions go deeper
06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM
- 772 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question.
06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM
- 798 Views
How many equation's has Moraine screwed up?
*NM*
06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
- 327 Views
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e322c/e322c8cefbd738204abe275558f6304b6c376db1" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87c35/87c35ab98ae7fb5951a48907ad70867983869bca" alt=""
100% I think Moriaine is a very beneficial trait that contributes a lot to the RAFO pool
*NM*
06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
- 350 Views
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e322c/e322c8cefbd738204abe275558f6304b6c376db1" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87c35/87c35ab98ae7fb5951a48907ad70867983869bca" alt=""
Re: Natural selection
07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
- 775 Views
Thanks a lot
07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM
- 916 Views
2 things
07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
- 679 Views
Re: 2 things
07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM
- 899 Views
Re: 2 things
07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM
- 712 Views
My best guess
07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM
- 746 Views
Re: My best guess
07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM
- 690 Views
Re: My best guess
07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM
- 844 Views