Active Users:611 Time:23/12/2025 09:02:39 AM
2 things Night Walker Send a noteboard - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
First, NS is always specific in nature, meaning there is always a selection pressure. There has never been a case where natural selection doesn’t involve specific selection. It is intrinsic to NS. Take the guppies experiment without predators. The new selection pressure is now sex. Get rid of sex and the selection pressure might be how fast one can convert nutrients, take that away and there will be something else. There is never a static system (which you seem to imply there is) where specific selection is not on-going.

Second, (I use this phrase loosely) we can not know the mind of nature. To expand on that, it is impossible to know what selection pressure will be greatest each season. We can only evaluate specific traits on a per period basis under certain conditions. We can then use those results to make assumptions on the whole and provide evidence for theories. This is the very nature of science. By your line of reasoning all of science is tautology due to the nature of the universe.
Reply to message
Natural selection - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM 1205 Views
selection for suitability - 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM 845 Views
Thanks for your responce - 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM 971 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it: - 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM 916 Views
Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM 927 Views
Yes it can - 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM 775 Views
But how? - 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM 989 Views
Okay, I think I see what you're saying - 08/08/2011 05:30:43 PM 792 Views
Close - 08/08/2011 05:41:46 PM 1012 Views
Re: Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM 1012 Views
I'm not sure I understand you - 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM 906 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies. - 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM 947 Views
Then it is still a tautology - 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM 946 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations. - 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM 1019 Views
Maybe... - 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM 892 Views
As I understand it - 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM 843 Views
Better... - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM 846 Views
Actually - 06/08/2011 10:13:51 PM 951 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 10:37:33 PM 1091 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 11:38:52 PM 1009 Views
Oeh - 07/08/2011 01:54:19 PM 837 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM 922 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 07:08:25 PM 922 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 07/08/2011 12:46:23 AM 912 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify... - 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM 933 Views
The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM 969 Views
Re: The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM 938 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question. - 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM 981 Views
TalkOrigins addresses this at length. - 06/08/2011 11:14:52 PM 1005 Views
Not very much, but interesting none the less - 06/08/2011 11:38:36 PM 1007 Views
Re: Natural selection - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM 943 Views
Thanks a lot - 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM 1081 Views
2 things - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM 826 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM 1049 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM 873 Views
My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM 922 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM 845 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM 1001 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM 872 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM 971 Views

Reply to Message