Active Users:1191 Time:22/11/2024 08:25:08 PM
2 things Night Walker Send a noteboard - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
First, NS is always specific in nature, meaning there is always a selection pressure. There has never been a case where natural selection doesn’t involve specific selection. It is intrinsic to NS. Take the guppies experiment without predators. The new selection pressure is now sex. Get rid of sex and the selection pressure might be how fast one can convert nutrients, take that away and there will be something else. There is never a static system (which you seem to imply there is) where specific selection is not on-going.

Second, (I use this phrase loosely) we can not know the mind of nature. To expand on that, it is impossible to know what selection pressure will be greatest each season. We can only evaluate specific traits on a per period basis under certain conditions. We can then use those results to make assumptions on the whole and provide evidence for theories. This is the very nature of science. By your line of reasoning all of science is tautology due to the nature of the universe.
Reply to message
Natural selection - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM 980 Views
selection for suitability - 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM 632 Views
Thanks for your responce - 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM 746 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it: - 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM 677 Views
Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM 680 Views
Yes it can - 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM 556 Views
But how? - 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM 749 Views
Okay, I think I see what you're saying - 08/08/2011 05:30:43 PM 566 Views
Close - 08/08/2011 05:41:46 PM 757 Views
Re: Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM 768 Views
I'm not sure I understand you - 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM 656 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies. - 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM 681 Views
Then it is still a tautology - 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM 693 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations. - 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM 788 Views
Maybe... - 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM 640 Views
As I understand it - 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM 622 Views
Better... - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM 607 Views
Actually - 06/08/2011 10:13:51 PM 689 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 10:37:33 PM 834 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 11:38:52 PM 755 Views
Oeh - 07/08/2011 01:54:19 PM 612 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM 690 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 07:08:25 PM 703 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 07/08/2011 12:46:23 AM 696 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify... - 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM 729 Views
The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM 725 Views
Re: The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM 700 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question. - 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM 732 Views
TalkOrigins addresses this at length. - 06/08/2011 11:14:52 PM 777 Views
Not very much, but interesting none the less - 06/08/2011 11:38:36 PM 774 Views
Re: Natural selection - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM 699 Views
Thanks a lot - 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM 840 Views
2 things - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM 619 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM 828 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM 643 Views
My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM 676 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM 615 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM 764 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM 612 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM 730 Views

Reply to Message