Active Users:598 Time:23/12/2024 05:45:43 AM
2 things Night Walker Send a noteboard - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
First, NS is always specific in nature, meaning there is always a selection pressure. There has never been a case where natural selection doesn’t involve specific selection. It is intrinsic to NS. Take the guppies experiment without predators. The new selection pressure is now sex. Get rid of sex and the selection pressure might be how fast one can convert nutrients, take that away and there will be something else. There is never a static system (which you seem to imply there is) where specific selection is not on-going.

Second, (I use this phrase loosely) we can not know the mind of nature. To expand on that, it is impossible to know what selection pressure will be greatest each season. We can only evaluate specific traits on a per period basis under certain conditions. We can then use those results to make assumptions on the whole and provide evidence for theories. This is the very nature of science. By your line of reasoning all of science is tautology due to the nature of the universe.
Reply to message
Natural selection - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM 992 Views
selection for suitability - 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM 643 Views
Thanks for your responce - 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM 762 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it: - 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM 686 Views
Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM 690 Views
Yes it can - 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM 571 Views
But how? - 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM 758 Views
Okay, I think I see what you're saying - 08/08/2011 05:30:43 PM 580 Views
Close - 08/08/2011 05:41:46 PM 774 Views
Re: Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM 780 Views
I'm not sure I understand you - 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM 668 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies. - 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM 698 Views
Then it is still a tautology - 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM 702 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations. - 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM 799 Views
Maybe... - 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM 658 Views
As I understand it - 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM 634 Views
Better... - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM 616 Views
Actually - 06/08/2011 10:13:51 PM 705 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 10:37:33 PM 847 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 11:38:52 PM 775 Views
Oeh - 07/08/2011 01:54:19 PM 623 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM 704 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 07:08:25 PM 716 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 07/08/2011 12:46:23 AM 705 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify... - 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM 736 Views
The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM 737 Views
Re: The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM 713 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question. - 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM 743 Views
TalkOrigins addresses this at length. - 06/08/2011 11:14:52 PM 793 Views
Not very much, but interesting none the less - 06/08/2011 11:38:36 PM 789 Views
Re: Natural selection - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM 714 Views
Thanks a lot - 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM 858 Views
2 things - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM 633 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM 843 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM 655 Views
My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM 691 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM 625 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM 778 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM 626 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM 744 Views

Reply to Message