Active Users:483 Time:06/07/2025 12:45:48 AM
2 things Night Walker Send a noteboard - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
First, NS is always specific in nature, meaning there is always a selection pressure. There has never been a case where natural selection doesn’t involve specific selection. It is intrinsic to NS. Take the guppies experiment without predators. The new selection pressure is now sex. Get rid of sex and the selection pressure might be how fast one can convert nutrients, take that away and there will be something else. There is never a static system (which you seem to imply there is) where specific selection is not on-going.

Second, (I use this phrase loosely) we can not know the mind of nature. To expand on that, it is impossible to know what selection pressure will be greatest each season. We can only evaluate specific traits on a per period basis under certain conditions. We can then use those results to make assumptions on the whole and provide evidence for theories. This is the very nature of science. By your line of reasoning all of science is tautology due to the nature of the universe.
Reply to message
Natural selection - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM 1106 Views
selection for suitability - 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM 754 Views
Thanks for your responce - 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM 865 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it: - 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM 816 Views
Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM 797 Views
Yes it can - 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM 670 Views
But how? - 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM 867 Views
Okay, I think I see what you're saying - 08/08/2011 05:30:43 PM 680 Views
Close - 08/08/2011 05:41:46 PM 885 Views
Re: Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM 892 Views
I'm not sure I understand you - 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM 796 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies. - 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM 814 Views
Then it is still a tautology - 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM 826 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations. - 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM 926 Views
Maybe... - 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM 775 Views
As I understand it - 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM 742 Views
Better... - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM 725 Views
Actually - 06/08/2011 10:13:51 PM 817 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 10:37:33 PM 954 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 11:38:52 PM 884 Views
Oeh - 07/08/2011 01:54:19 PM 730 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM 820 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 07:08:25 PM 826 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 07/08/2011 12:46:23 AM 821 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify... - 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM 842 Views
The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM 844 Views
Re: The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM 828 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question. - 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM 847 Views
TalkOrigins addresses this at length. - 06/08/2011 11:14:52 PM 909 Views
Not very much, but interesting none the less - 06/08/2011 11:38:36 PM 897 Views
Re: Natural selection - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM 828 Views
Thanks a lot - 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM 973 Views
2 things - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM 731 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM 945 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM 767 Views
My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM 809 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM 739 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM 895 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM 740 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM 861 Views

Reply to Message