Active Users:834 Time:16/09/2025 04:08:47 PM
Re: Natural selection Night Walker Send a noteboard - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
NS is the process through which evolution acts. The process itself is governed by things like biological fitness. Fitness is determined by the genotype and phenotype of an individual to produce viable offspring. NS requires a selection pressure to “do its job”.

I think what you are having an issue with (based on reading other posts) is that it is impossible for us to know which trait will be beneficial to a given species in the wild before it happens. In order to test something like this we would have to have a static environment which is hard to come by. However some have managed it. Have you ever heard of the guppy experiment? That experiment shows how selection pressure causes natural selection for a certain trait and thus can alter the gene pool (and cause micro-evolution). In this environment you can then hypothesize about what traits will enhance ones fitness given the selection pressure. Thus you have tested NS.

Edit: I wanted to add that NS is not random like most people think it is. The random portion about NS is finding out which individuals, if any, have the "right" combo of genes for a given selection pressure. Thus if a selection pressure is great enough or radical enough some species will not have the "right" genes and go extinct. NS is very specific in selecting the animals in a species with certain traits.
Guppies
This message last edited by Night Walker on 07/08/2011 at 03:08:17 AM
Reply to message
Natural selection - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM 1138 Views
selection for suitability - 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM 779 Views
Thanks for your responce - 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM 890 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it: - 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM 845 Views
Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM 852 Views
Yes it can - 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM 706 Views
But how? - 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM 904 Views
Okay, I think I see what you're saying - 08/08/2011 05:30:43 PM 710 Views
Close - 08/08/2011 05:41:46 PM 918 Views
Re: Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM 926 Views
I'm not sure I understand you - 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM 824 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies. - 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM 848 Views
Then it is still a tautology - 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM 857 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations. - 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM 955 Views
Maybe... - 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM 808 Views
As I understand it - 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM 772 Views
Better... - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM 762 Views
Actually - 06/08/2011 10:13:51 PM 843 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 10:37:33 PM 987 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 11:38:52 PM 913 Views
Oeh - 07/08/2011 01:54:19 PM 766 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM 847 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 07:08:25 PM 858 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 07/08/2011 12:46:23 AM 851 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify... - 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM 874 Views
The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM 894 Views
Re: The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM 856 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question. - 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM 888 Views
TalkOrigins addresses this at length. - 06/08/2011 11:14:52 PM 939 Views
Not very much, but interesting none the less - 06/08/2011 11:38:36 PM 923 Views
Re: Natural selection - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM 866 Views
Thanks a lot - 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM 1000 Views
2 things - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM 759 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM 977 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM 799 Views
My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM 846 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM 772 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM 933 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM 784 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM 898 Views

Reply to Message