Even if you can only measure it after the fact, that doesn't mean it cannot be "predicted or tested."
You can't KNOW, or ACCURATELY predict ANYTHING that has never been tested before, but you can make predictions, do tests, and study the results. This would apply to determining whether a new trait is beneficial for a population of organisms as much as it would to anything else in science.
You can't KNOW, or ACCURATELY predict ANYTHING that has never been tested before, but you can make predictions, do tests, and study the results. This would apply to determining whether a new trait is beneficial for a population of organisms as much as it would to anything else in science.
Natural selection
- 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM
979 Views
selection for suitability
- 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM
631 Views
Thanks for your responce 
- 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
746 Views
- 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
746 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it:
- 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM
676 Views
Just a question
- 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM
679 Views
Yes it can
- 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM
556 Views
But how?
- 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM
749 Views
Re: Just a question
- 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM
768 Views
I'm not sure I understand you
- 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM
655 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies.
- 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM
681 Views
Then it is still a tautology
- 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM
692 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations.
- 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM
788 Views
Maybe...
- 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM
639 Views
I'm more inclined toward his logic, but possibly toward your conclusions.
- 09/08/2011 12:45:46 AM
728 Views
we can't really know ahead of time what makes a specific trait benefical in that environment
- 09/08/2011 06:16:02 PM
791 Views
As I understand it
- 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM
621 Views
Better...
- 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM
607 Views
Did you perhaps mean "beneficial in the environment" rather than "beneficial to the environment"?
- 06/08/2011 06:34:44 PM
742 Views
yes. I did not really phrase that very clearly. *NM*
- 09/08/2011 06:14:11 PM
292 Views
No biggy; from what Bram said, I underestimated how well you were understood anyway.
- 09/08/2011 06:45:16 PM
671 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that
- 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM
690 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify...
- 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM
729 Views
The questions go deeper
- 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM
724 Views
Re: The questions go deeper
- 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM
700 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question.
- 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM
732 Views
How many equation's has Moraine screwed up? 
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
302 Views
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
302 Views
100% I think Moriaine is a very beneficial trait that contributes a lot to the RAFO pool *NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
323 Views
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
323 Views
Re: Natural selection
- 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
698 Views
Thanks a lot
- 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM
839 Views
2 things
- 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
618 Views
Re: 2 things
- 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM
827 Views
Re: 2 things
- 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM
643 Views
My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM
676 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM
615 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM
763 Views