Active Users:587 Time:23/12/2024 05:35:26 AM
Better... Bramhodoulos Send a noteboard - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM
Animals with traits that are beneficial to the environment can live longer and potentially contribute more to the gene pool.

The latter is all that matters (biological fitness, or how many viable offspring are produced) in natural selection. Lifespan and any greater purpose (benefit to the environment) are not applicable.


As I see your revision it seems you are more careful in describing NS, but does your view on NS escape being a tautology?
Since contributing to the gene pool is the only definition you give, it either has no result (the author calls that a 'lame' definition, since it isolates the proces of NS so that it no longer tries to explain evolution), or the result is a difference in the gene pool (that is: a difference in the frequencies of genes) after one or several generations, and then we have a tautology again.
Reply to message
Natural selection - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM 992 Views
selection for suitability - 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM 643 Views
Thanks for your responce - 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM 762 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it: - 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM 686 Views
Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM 690 Views
Yes it can - 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM 571 Views
But how? - 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM 758 Views
Okay, I think I see what you're saying - 08/08/2011 05:30:43 PM 579 Views
Close - 08/08/2011 05:41:46 PM 774 Views
Re: Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM 779 Views
I'm not sure I understand you - 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM 668 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies. - 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM 697 Views
Then it is still a tautology - 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM 702 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations. - 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM 799 Views
Maybe... - 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM 658 Views
As I understand it - 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM 633 Views
Better... - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM 616 Views
Actually - 06/08/2011 10:13:51 PM 705 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 10:37:33 PM 847 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 11:38:52 PM 774 Views
Oeh - 07/08/2011 01:54:19 PM 623 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM 704 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 07:08:25 PM 716 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 07/08/2011 12:46:23 AM 705 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify... - 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM 736 Views
The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM 737 Views
Re: The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM 712 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question. - 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM 743 Views
TalkOrigins addresses this at length. - 06/08/2011 11:14:52 PM 793 Views
Not very much, but interesting none the less - 06/08/2011 11:38:36 PM 789 Views
Re: Natural selection - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM 714 Views
Thanks a lot - 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM 858 Views
2 things - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM 632 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM 843 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM 655 Views
My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM 691 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM 625 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM 778 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM 626 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM 744 Views

Reply to Message