Active Users:1185 Time:22/11/2024 07:46:23 PM
Better... Bramhodoulos Send a noteboard - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM
Animals with traits that are beneficial to the environment can live longer and potentially contribute more to the gene pool.

The latter is all that matters (biological fitness, or how many viable offspring are produced) in natural selection. Lifespan and any greater purpose (benefit to the environment) are not applicable.


As I see your revision it seems you are more careful in describing NS, but does your view on NS escape being a tautology?
Since contributing to the gene pool is the only definition you give, it either has no result (the author calls that a 'lame' definition, since it isolates the proces of NS so that it no longer tries to explain evolution), or the result is a difference in the gene pool (that is: a difference in the frequencies of genes) after one or several generations, and then we have a tautology again.
Reply to message
Natural selection - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM 979 Views
selection for suitability - 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM 631 Views
Thanks for your responce - 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM 746 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it: - 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM 676 Views
Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM 679 Views
Yes it can - 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM 555 Views
But how? - 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM 749 Views
Okay, I think I see what you're saying - 08/08/2011 05:30:43 PM 565 Views
Close - 08/08/2011 05:41:46 PM 757 Views
Re: Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM 768 Views
I'm not sure I understand you - 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM 655 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies. - 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM 681 Views
Then it is still a tautology - 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM 692 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations. - 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM 788 Views
Maybe... - 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM 639 Views
As I understand it - 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM 621 Views
Better... - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM 607 Views
Actually - 06/08/2011 10:13:51 PM 689 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 10:37:33 PM 833 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 11:38:52 PM 754 Views
Oeh - 07/08/2011 01:54:19 PM 611 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM 690 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 07:08:25 PM 702 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 07/08/2011 12:46:23 AM 695 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify... - 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM 729 Views
The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM 724 Views
Re: The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM 700 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question. - 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM 732 Views
TalkOrigins addresses this at length. - 06/08/2011 11:14:52 PM 777 Views
Not very much, but interesting none the less - 06/08/2011 11:38:36 PM 774 Views
Re: Natural selection - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM 698 Views
Thanks a lot - 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM 839 Views
2 things - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM 618 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM 827 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM 643 Views
My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM 676 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM 615 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM 763 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM 611 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM 730 Views

Reply to Message