Animals with traits that are beneficial to the environment can live longer and potentially contribute more to the gene pool.
The latter is all that matters (biological fitness, or how many viable offspring are produced) in natural selection. Lifespan and any greater purpose (benefit to the environment) are not applicable.
As I see your revision it seems you are more careful in describing NS, but does your view on NS escape being a tautology?
Since contributing to the gene pool is the only definition you give, it either has no result (the author calls that a 'lame' definition, since it isolates the proces of NS so that it no longer tries to explain evolution), or the result is a difference in the gene pool (that is: a difference in the frequencies of genes) after one or several generations, and then we have a tautology again.
Natural selection
- 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM
1080 Views
selection for suitability
- 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM
728 Views
Thanks for your responce 
- 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
844 Views
- 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
844 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it:
- 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM
788 Views
Just a question
- 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM
771 Views
Yes it can
- 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM
648 Views
But how?
- 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM
844 Views
Re: Just a question
- 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM
865 Views
I'm not sure I understand you
- 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM
769 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies.
- 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM
790 Views
Then it is still a tautology
- 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM
799 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations.
- 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM
902 Views
Maybe...
- 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM
754 Views
I'm more inclined toward his logic, but possibly toward your conclusions.
- 09/08/2011 12:45:46 AM
835 Views
we can't really know ahead of time what makes a specific trait benefical in that environment
- 09/08/2011 06:16:02 PM
892 Views
As I understand it
- 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM
720 Views
Better...
- 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM
701 Views
Did you perhaps mean "beneficial in the environment" rather than "beneficial to the environment"?
- 06/08/2011 06:34:44 PM
826 Views
yes. I did not really phrase that very clearly. *NM*
- 09/08/2011 06:14:11 PM
331 Views
No biggy; from what Bram said, I underestimated how well you were understood anyway.
- 09/08/2011 06:45:16 PM
768 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that
- 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM
800 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify...
- 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM
825 Views
The questions go deeper
- 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM
816 Views
Re: The questions go deeper
- 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM
806 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question.
- 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM
826 Views
How many equation's has Moraine screwed up? 
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
341 Views
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
341 Views
100% I think Moriaine is a very beneficial trait that contributes a lot to the RAFO pool *NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
364 Views
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
364 Views
Re: Natural selection
- 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
800 Views
Thanks a lot
- 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM
946 Views
2 things
- 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
705 Views
Re: 2 things
- 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM
923 Views
Re: 2 things
- 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM
737 Views
My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM
769 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM
712 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM
866 Views