Active Users:575 Time:26/11/2024 01:14:00 AM
Not at all; you stated exactly why I wasn't being tangential. Joel Send a noteboard - 30/07/2011 12:47:08 PM
Look Joel, I try real hard not to criticize people about going off on tangents because I'm bad about it myself, but this is getting ridiculous and I have already asked you not to veer off and your response is to do more of it. While you have at least not thrown personal insults at me as you have others the last few days, and while there does appear to be some justification for having done that, I am not here, do not come here, and do not speak with you so that you can rant to me about how much you hate people I agree with.

The only possible way I can see your comments as applicable to what I originally posted about is if you are trying to prove me false by showing that recent public tensions aren't the byproduct of spotlight effects but rather the simple inherent evilness of the right wing. Considering your comments to others, you apparently believe that so maybe you really do view yourself as on-topic. If that is the case though, do not speak to me, as it would serve no purpose and you will not convince me that I am 'evil' and I will not disassociate myself from my ideology to change your opinion of me nor do I desire to to hear you cast insults my way. If that is not the case, than you have gone way off topic and I will say again, my point remains that politics has not gotten meaner or more partisan, and that where it has it is mostly done so from what amounts to Observer Effect. If you wish to debate that, I am happy to, if you do not, then don't reply to me on posts about it with unrelated material.

I don't hate or think them, or anyone, "evil". I think a lot of them are dangerous radicals catering to an unstable fringe. I further think John Boehner agrees with me; it's just so vicious now he's afraid to say so publicly. I'll keep to the fiscal policy side of that since that's what we're discussing, but it's DEFINITELY applicable in OTHER areas. Rejecting radicals who share much of your ideology isn't rejecting your principles. Disgust with their rhetoric and disagreement with their ideology doesn't mean I disagree with Palin and Bachmann on 2 and 2 being 4 (though atm I'm not sure we even do math the same way... ). Keep the ideology and we'll debate policy, but dump the radicals before they bankrupt the country.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Reid/Democrats cave, Republicans win debt ceiling debate - - 25/07/2011 07:29:17 PM 1023 Views
Why must it always be us against them - 25/07/2011 08:12:48 PM 534 Views
Two-party system = us vs. them - 25/07/2011 09:00:31 PM 523 Views
Re: Two-party system - us vs. them - 25/07/2011 09:08:55 PM 558 Views
fuck you - 26/07/2011 03:17:04 AM 594 Views
HA! HA! - I think I broke moondog's mind..... - 26/07/2011 04:09:59 AM 514 Views
it's not about support, it's about getting *some* of what you want - 26/07/2011 06:31:26 AM 524 Views
I am only getting "some" of what I want..... - 26/07/2011 03:01:28 PM 645 Views
Re: I am only getting "some" of what I want..... - 26/07/2011 03:23:13 PM 562 Views
It generally isn't - 25/07/2011 09:30:36 PM 557 Views
It formerly wasn't. - 25/07/2011 10:22:47 PM 591 Views
That's mostly BS - 26/07/2011 12:57:26 AM 641 Views
Boehner was onboard with Obamas initial deal but cited his caucus as the reason he backed out of it. - 26/07/2011 01:39:06 AM 720 Views
I'm sorry, did I mention Boehner in my message somewhere? Or the deal? - 26/07/2011 03:11:40 AM 540 Views
The "rest" you wanted me to spare you. - 27/07/2011 03:22:54 AM 630 Views
Re: I'm sorry, did I mention Boehner in my message somewhere? Or the deal? - 29/07/2011 08:26:12 AM 676 Views
Is there some lack of understanding about 'tangent' maybe? - 30/07/2011 04:57:15 AM 581 Views
Not at all; you stated exactly why I wasn't being tangential. - 30/07/2011 12:47:08 PM 483 Views
You're making overtly contradictory statements now, so I think we're done - 31/07/2011 01:57:37 AM 514 Views
Half tangent then, according to the terms you set. - 31/07/2011 02:24:15 AM 698 Views
"Problem solved"?!!! - 25/07/2011 10:18:44 PM 619 Views
It's not just about his reelection. Can you imagine having this circus again next year? - 25/07/2011 09:16:17 PM 557 Views
or he is worried that with and election coming more dems will break ranks - 25/07/2011 10:00:56 PM 527 Views
Yes... yes, I can.... - 07/12/2012 02:01:57 AM 460 Views
Yeah, pretty much. - 25/07/2011 10:12:03 PM 729 Views
yeah, he pretty much lost my vote for a second term. *NM* - 25/07/2011 11:31:16 PM 220 Views
The real question is where do we go from here. - 26/07/2011 01:52:31 AM 464 Views
Reid didn't cave as much as you might think - 25/07/2011 11:58:08 PM 514 Views
I agree with that. - 25/07/2011 11:59:41 PM 539 Views
to bad we have a media more interested in hyping the drama than they are in cutting through BS - 26/07/2011 01:42:39 AM 526 Views
Absolutely. - 26/07/2011 01:37:08 PM 461 Views
we need a law like they have in canada that you can't lie during a newscast - 26/07/2011 03:58:38 PM 527 Views
they don't lie they just edit the truth until it fits them - 26/07/2011 04:41:24 PM 427 Views
I agree completely. - 26/07/2011 05:07:37 PM 507 Views

Reply to Message