to bad we have a media more interested in hyping the drama than they are in cutting through BS
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 26/07/2011 01:42:39 AM
Entertainment value shouldn't be the first goal of the news. Politicians are going to spin, it is what they do, it would be nice to have some media that actually thought informing people so they could make their best decision was still a goal. I mean it isn't even like the politicians are being sly and crafty, anyone paying a little bit of attention can see that the BS is piled high and deep on both sides of the isle. I don't think the answer is so much throw them out as hold them accountable for the words and their actions. If you support or opposition to doing something like raising the debt ceiling changes depending on whose ass sits in the oval office you need to be publicly called out on that. We also need to get away form letting them just blame the other guys. make them be specific about what actions actually caused the problems and make them be specific about how they think the problem need to be resolved. We also need to get away from making politicians take vows other than their oath of office. We shouldn't be sending them to the table to compromise after we forced them to publicly swear they wouldn't.
Sorry I'm tired and feeling a little ranty.
Sorry I'm tired and feeling a little ranty.
Reid/Democrats cave, Republicans win debt ceiling debate -
25/07/2011 07:29:17 PM
- 1096 Views

Why must it always be us against them
25/07/2011 08:12:48 PM
- 603 Views
Two-party system = us vs. them
25/07/2011 09:00:31 PM
- 584 Views
fuck you
26/07/2011 03:17:04 AM
- 660 Views
HA! HA! - I think I broke moondog's mind.....
26/07/2011 04:09:59 AM
- 574 Views
it's not about support, it's about getting *some* of what you want
26/07/2011 06:31:26 AM
- 594 Views
I am only getting "some" of what I want.....
26/07/2011 03:01:28 PM
- 717 Views
when your position is intractable, don't be surprised when people refuse to work with you
26/07/2011 03:55:28 PM
- 574 Views
It generally isn't
25/07/2011 09:30:36 PM
- 624 Views
It formerly wasn't.
25/07/2011 10:22:47 PM
- 660 Views
That's mostly BS
26/07/2011 12:57:26 AM
- 706 Views
Boehner was onboard with Obamas initial deal but cited his caucus as the reason he backed out of it.
26/07/2011 01:39:06 AM
- 787 Views
I'm sorry, did I mention Boehner in my message somewhere? Or the deal?
26/07/2011 03:11:40 AM
- 611 Views
Re: I'm sorry, did I mention Boehner in my message somewhere? Or the deal?
29/07/2011 08:26:12 AM
- 760 Views
Is there some lack of understanding about 'tangent' maybe?
30/07/2011 04:57:15 AM
- 645 Views
Not at all; you stated exactly why I wasn't being tangential.
30/07/2011 12:47:08 PM
- 551 Views
You're making overtly contradictory statements now, so I think we're done
31/07/2011 01:57:37 AM
- 581 Views
It's not just about his reelection. Can you imagine having this circus again next year?
25/07/2011 09:16:17 PM
- 631 Views
or he is worried that with and election coming more dems will break ranks
25/07/2011 10:00:56 PM
- 562 Views
Yeah, pretty much.
25/07/2011 10:12:03 PM
- 802 Views
Reid didn't cave as much as you might think
25/07/2011 11:58:08 PM
- 581 Views
I agree with that.
25/07/2011 11:59:41 PM
- 603 Views
to bad we have a media more interested in hyping the drama than they are in cutting through BS
26/07/2011 01:42:39 AM
- 590 Views
we need a law like they have in canada that you can't lie during a newscast
26/07/2011 03:58:38 PM
- 597 Views
Yeah, but any tax hikes, and any Dem leverage, is gone now.
26/07/2011 01:51:04 AM
- 759 Views
the tax cuts are set to expire on their own, they don't need to vote to cancel them.
26/07/2011 02:04:58 PM
- 521 Views
Yes, but they voted to extend them last winter, which you insist was the Dems fault.
27/07/2011 03:30:33 AM
- 615 Views