Active Users:1100 Time:22/11/2024 10:21:58 PM
Sorry, but that doesn't make sense ironclad Send a noteboard - 06/07/2011 07:02:33 PM
While I agree with you completely about nanny state laws, your logic about not wearing seatbelts doesn't completely hold up. If you're in an accident and not wearing a seatbelt, you can severely injure or even kill the other passengers in the car when your unbelted body goes flying around the cab at high speeds.

That said, I still agree with you that it should be your choice, not the government's, but you should at least know that your decision not to wear a seatbelt does place more lives at risk than your own, and factor that knowledge into your decision.

As far as I am concerned, people's freedom can go to hell as soon as their freedom or carelessness threaten others. As you explained in your first paragraph, that's the case when an unbelted person catapults through the car. The conclusion: make them do it by law. Admitting it's dangerous but leaving it to each on their own if they want to threaten their children or not takes the personal freedom a little too much for my taste ;)
*MySmiley*

You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
Reply to message
You can't make this stuff up: Helmet law protester dies in crash - 05/07/2011 08:47:14 PM 872 Views
Kinda undermines his protest *NM* - 05/07/2011 09:01:50 PM 256 Views
Just a tad bit *NM* - 05/07/2011 09:06:24 PM 233 Views
How so? He wasn't demanding the right to survive crashes when only a helmet makes that possible. - 05/07/2011 11:06:44 PM 543 Views
New York feels that people should have to wear helmets for their own safety - 05/07/2011 11:20:36 PM 516 Views
He felt his own safety was his own concern. - 06/07/2011 12:07:05 AM 457 Views
Who do you think would have ended up paying for his care for the rest of his life if the accident - 06/07/2011 01:08:49 AM 601 Views
The same people who pay for everyone else whose actions render them vegetables. - 06/07/2011 01:50:20 AM 712 Views
Maybe a more effective argument you could use against me would be pointing out - 06/07/2011 02:33:21 AM 505 Views
Yeah, that is a better example. - 06/07/2011 03:03:01 AM 486 Views
Oops, ignore! *NM* - 06/07/2011 11:44:10 PM 307 Views
Now, who said irony wasn't funny? *NM* - 05/07/2011 09:22:58 PM 364 Views
what a fricking idiot - 05/07/2011 10:02:17 PM 684 Views
That's your opinion to which you're entitled. - 05/07/2011 11:19:36 PM 925 Views
Anarchy, baby! *NM* - 06/07/2011 12:58:23 AM 464 Views
Uh Joel... - 06/07/2011 03:38:24 AM 541 Views
Sorry, but that doesn't make sense - 06/07/2011 07:02:33 PM 744 Views
Yes it does - 06/07/2011 07:32:54 PM 485 Views
how many people are really seriously injured that way? - 06/07/2011 07:15:16 PM 705 Views
Did you actually read my post? - 06/07/2011 07:36:13 PM 606 Views
my ex had 3 cracked ribs from an accident like that - 07/07/2011 02:46:07 AM 648 Views
Re: That's your opinion to which you're entitled. - 06/07/2011 05:18:12 PM 708 Views
Re: That's your opinion to which you're entitled. - 06/07/2011 06:13:44 PM 773 Views
Hold the phone here... - 06/07/2011 07:49:10 PM 872 Views
+1 *NM* - 06/07/2011 08:42:14 PM 322 Views
You agree with him that the abortion debate is about a mothers convenience versus the babys life? - 06/07/2011 10:48:52 PM 611 Views
im not bringing abortion into this, its a separate issue *NM* - 06/07/2011 10:56:17 PM 308 Views
It's really not. - 07/07/2011 12:20:10 AM 644 Views
i'm really not - 07/07/2011 03:34:23 PM 715 Views
What else could the debate be about? - 06/07/2011 10:58:51 PM 577 Views
"The babys life", not just "life". - 07/07/2011 12:18:02 AM 904 Views
I think I could make that up. *NM* - 05/07/2011 11:41:00 PM 257 Views
Smartass *NM* - 06/07/2011 12:57:22 AM 262 Views
Helmets help save lives. 'Onest. - 07/07/2011 04:40:42 PM 645 Views

Reply to Message