While I agree with you completely about nanny state laws, your logic about not wearing seatbelts doesn't completely hold up. If you're in an accident and not wearing a seatbelt, you can severely injure or even kill the other passengers in the car when your unbelted body goes flying around the cab at high speeds.
That said, I still agree with you that it should be your choice, not the government's, but you should at least know that your decision not to wear a seatbelt does place more lives at risk than your own, and factor that knowledge into your decision.
As far as I am concerned, people's freedom can go to hell as soon as their freedom or carelessness threaten others. As you explained in your first paragraph, that's the case when an unbelted person catapults through the car. The conclusion: make them do it by law. Admitting it's dangerous but leaving it to each on their own if they want to threaten their children or not takes the personal freedom a little too much for my taste
*MySmiley*
You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
You can't make this stuff up: Helmet law protester dies in crash
05/07/2011 08:47:14 PM
- 872 Views
Kinda undermines his protest *NM*
05/07/2011 09:01:50 PM
- 256 Views
How so? He wasn't demanding the right to survive crashes when only a helmet makes that possible.
05/07/2011 11:06:44 PM
- 543 Views
New York feels that people should have to wear helmets for their own safety
05/07/2011 11:20:36 PM
- 516 Views
He felt his own safety was his own concern.
06/07/2011 12:07:05 AM
- 457 Views
Who do you think would have ended up paying for his care for the rest of his life if the accident
06/07/2011 01:08:49 AM
- 601 Views
The same people who pay for everyone else whose actions render them vegetables.
06/07/2011 01:50:20 AM
- 712 Views
Maybe a more effective argument you could use against me would be pointing out
06/07/2011 02:33:21 AM
- 505 Views
what a fricking idiot
05/07/2011 10:02:17 PM
- 684 Views
That's your opinion to which you're entitled.
05/07/2011 11:19:36 PM
- 925 Views
Anarchy, baby! *NM*
06/07/2011 12:58:23 AM
- 464 Views
Sorry, as an advocate of civil rights (which especially includes minorities) I oppose anarchy.
06/07/2011 01:18:19 AM
- 584 Views
The public's nose is on the line here too.
06/07/2011 01:47:08 AM
- 642 Views
So my increased ease of hearing/seeing vehicles and other hazards isn't worth $1200.
06/07/2011 02:25:53 AM
- 648 Views
I understand the pov, I had a BF who felt that same way. It's still much like childish defiance.
06/07/2011 01:26:15 AM
- 746 Views
In part it's a matter of principle, but if we really want to analyze it there's some deeper validity
06/07/2011 02:13:05 AM
- 611 Views
you keep spreading falsehoods, stop it please
06/07/2011 02:49:01 AM
- 784 Views
Sounds like your real argument is with the other bikers; I'm just reiterating their arguments.
06/07/2011 03:38:39 AM
- 711 Views
Uh Joel...
06/07/2011 03:38:24 AM
- 541 Views
Agreed, having others in the car does make a difference.
06/07/2011 03:47:53 AM
- 624 Views
Hence why your "I wouldn't wear a seatbelt in the back seat" comment didn't make a lot of sense
06/07/2011 07:38:50 PM
- 588 Views
Depends on whether the driver, rather than the law, is the one insisting.
06/07/2011 08:06:24 PM
- 457 Views
You'd place your own comfort over other people's safety?
06/07/2011 11:37:00 PM
- 494 Views
It's more a comfort issue than anything else; it's not solely one.
06/07/2011 11:56:28 PM
- 972 Views
Sorry, but that doesn't make sense
06/07/2011 07:02:33 PM
- 744 Views
Hold the phone here...
06/07/2011 07:49:10 PM
- 872 Views
+1 *NM*
06/07/2011 08:42:14 PM
- 322 Views
You agree with him that the abortion debate is about a mothers convenience versus the babys life?
06/07/2011 10:48:52 PM
- 611 Views
im not bringing abortion into this, its a separate issue *NM*
06/07/2011 10:56:17 PM
- 308 Views
It's really not.
07/07/2011 12:20:10 AM
- 644 Views
i'm really not
07/07/2011 03:34:23 PM
- 715 Views
Fine as far as it goes, but public/private only matters to the extent others are affected.
09/07/2011 11:15:33 AM
- 679 Views
Holding the phone here might be good, yes....
06/07/2011 10:33:46 PM
- 699 Views
See...that's the difference between you and me
06/07/2011 10:56:53 PM
- 802 Views
Apparently so; "completely anarchy as long as its regulated to one's body" sounds nonsensical to me.
06/07/2011 11:44:50 PM
- 805 Views
I'm with Joel. I always buckle up/helmet up, but I think such laws are asinine
06/07/2011 02:30:04 AM
- 468 Views
why not just ban motorcycles all together, they are much more dangerous than cars
06/07/2011 05:39:51 PM
- 482 Views
Helmets help save lives. 'Onest.
07/07/2011 04:40:42 PM
- 645 Views
So do not smoking, eating right and regular exercise, but we haven't made them mandatory.
09/07/2011 11:04:58 AM
- 653 Views