Agreed, having others in the car does make a difference.
Joel Send a noteboard - 06/07/2011 03:47:53 AM
While I agree with you completely about nanny state laws, your logic about not wearing seatbelts doesn't completely hold up. If you're in an accident and not wearing a seatbelt, you can severely injure or even kill the other passengers in the car when your unbelted body goes flying around the cab at high speeds.
That said, I still agree with you that it should be your choice, not the government's, but you should at least know that your decision not to wear a seatbelt does place more lives at risk than your own, and factor that knowledge into your decision.
That said, I still agree with you that it should be your choice, not the government's, but you should at least know that your decision not to wear a seatbelt does place more lives at risk than your own, and factor that knowledge into your decision.
If only in terms of the risk they're willing to accept to be in a vehicle with you; even if it weren't the law, if someone insisted I wear a seatbelt in their car, or when they rode in mine, I'd respect that. Where it would get sticky for me would be with parents and kids, whether it's an issue of parental rights or child endangerment, and I'm not sure where I'd fall on that one, but lean toward "you don't have the right to let your kid play on the freeway". If only because there were less school shootings when parents were held responsible for their kids instead of just filing lawsuits on their behalf.
OK, I can't type; time for bed....
' />
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 06/07/2011 at 03:48:28 AM
You can't make this stuff up: Helmet law protester dies in crash
- 05/07/2011 08:47:14 PM
872 Views
Kinda undermines his protest
*NM*
- 05/07/2011 09:01:50 PM
255 Views
*NM*
- 05/07/2011 09:01:50 PM
255 Views
How so? He wasn't demanding the right to survive crashes when only a helmet makes that possible.
- 05/07/2011 11:06:44 PM
543 Views
New York feels that people should have to wear helmets for their own safety
- 05/07/2011 11:20:36 PM
516 Views
He felt his own safety was his own concern.
- 06/07/2011 12:07:05 AM
456 Views
Who do you think would have ended up paying for his care for the rest of his life if the accident
- 06/07/2011 01:08:49 AM
600 Views
The same people who pay for everyone else whose actions render them vegetables.
- 06/07/2011 01:50:20 AM
711 Views
Maybe a more effective argument you could use against me would be pointing out
- 06/07/2011 02:33:21 AM
505 Views
*NM*
what a fricking idiot
- 05/07/2011 10:02:17 PM
683 Views
That's your opinion to which you're entitled.
- 05/07/2011 11:19:36 PM
925 Views
Anarchy, baby! *NM*
- 06/07/2011 12:58:23 AM
463 Views
Sorry, as an advocate of civil rights (which especially includes minorities) I oppose anarchy.
- 06/07/2011 01:18:19 AM
583 Views
The public's nose is on the line here too.
- 06/07/2011 01:47:08 AM
642 Views
So my increased ease of hearing/seeing vehicles and other hazards isn't worth $1200.
- 06/07/2011 02:25:53 AM
647 Views
I understand the pov, I had a BF who felt that same way. It's still much like childish defiance.
- 06/07/2011 01:26:15 AM
746 Views
In part it's a matter of principle, but if we really want to analyze it there's some deeper validity
- 06/07/2011 02:13:05 AM
611 Views
you keep spreading falsehoods, stop it please
- 06/07/2011 02:49:01 AM
784 Views
Sounds like your real argument is with the other bikers; I'm just reiterating their arguments.
- 06/07/2011 03:38:39 AM
711 Views
Uh Joel...
- 06/07/2011 03:38:24 AM
541 Views
Agreed, having others in the car does make a difference.
- 06/07/2011 03:47:53 AM
624 Views
Hence why your "I wouldn't wear a seatbelt in the back seat" comment didn't make a lot of sense
- 06/07/2011 07:38:50 PM
587 Views
- 06/07/2011 07:38:50 PM
587 Views
Depends on whether the driver, rather than the law, is the one insisting.
- 06/07/2011 08:06:24 PM
456 Views
You'd place your own comfort over other people's safety?
- 06/07/2011 11:37:00 PM
494 Views
It's more a comfort issue than anything else; it's not solely one.
- 06/07/2011 11:56:28 PM
972 Views
Hold the phone here...
- 06/07/2011 07:49:10 PM
871 Views
+1 *NM*
- 06/07/2011 08:42:14 PM
322 Views
You agree with him that the abortion debate is about a mothers convenience versus the babys life?
- 06/07/2011 10:48:52 PM
611 Views
im not bringing abortion into this, its a separate issue *NM*
- 06/07/2011 10:56:17 PM
307 Views
It's really not.
- 07/07/2011 12:20:10 AM
643 Views
i'm really not
- 07/07/2011 03:34:23 PM
714 Views
Fine as far as it goes, but public/private only matters to the extent others are affected.
- 09/07/2011 11:15:33 AM
678 Views
Holding the phone here might be good, yes.... 
- 06/07/2011 10:33:46 PM
699 Views
- 06/07/2011 10:33:46 PM
699 Views
See...that's the difference between you and me
- 06/07/2011 10:56:53 PM
802 Views
Apparently so; "completely anarchy as long as its regulated to one's body" sounds nonsensical to me.
- 06/07/2011 11:44:50 PM
804 Views
I'm with Joel. I always buckle up/helmet up, but I think such laws are asinine
- 06/07/2011 02:30:04 AM
467 Views
why not just ban motorcycles all together, they are much more dangerous than cars
- 06/07/2011 05:39:51 PM
481 Views
Helmets help save lives. 'Onest.
- 07/07/2011 04:40:42 PM
645 Views
So do not smoking, eating right and regular exercise, but we haven't made them mandatory.
- 09/07/2011 11:04:58 AM
653 Views