Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy.
Dreaded Anomaly Send a noteboard - 25/06/2011 09:37:28 PM
Personally I'd rather states put it to a direct vote on the ballot, keeps it clean from any legislative antics and makes it harder for the legislature to repeal it or pass it themselves if it fails since the electorate makes their will known, but so long as it's not the courts doing it and so long as it left churches and such the freedom not perform the ceremonies I've got no issue with it.
And if you're not convinced by the philosophical aspects, you should be by the successful fear- and misinformation-based campaigns run against gay marriage nationwide wherever it's been up for popular vote.
New York Senate approves same-sex marriage
25/06/2011 03:47:43 AM
- 1220 Views
I'm actually not opposed to this.
25/06/2011 03:48:32 PM
- 586 Views
I'm not sure why there was even any need for such explicit protection.
25/06/2011 04:04:47 PM
- 577 Views
so in your only Catholics are really married?
26/06/2011 12:04:07 AM
- 582 Views
Church Doctrine.
26/06/2011 12:57:39 AM
- 706 Views
That's patently wrong in that Orthodox weddings are explicitly recognized by the Church.
26/06/2011 02:42:00 PM
- 602 Views
Yeah okay...
26/06/2011 05:16:05 PM
- 642 Views
They are outside of the authority of Rome, and have, on occasion, excommunicated Popes.
27/06/2011 05:03:31 PM
- 615 Views
Seems fine to me
25/06/2011 05:44:30 PM
- 573 Views
Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy.
25/06/2011 09:37:28 PM
- 709 Views
Re: Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy.
26/06/2011 03:11:06 AM
- 653 Views
Good luck telling that to the deeply religious right.
26/06/2011 03:20:04 AM
- 568 Views
I am a deeply religious member of the right, and I tell them that all the time *NM*
26/06/2011 03:30:14 AM
- 246 Views
After a number of years of gay marriage
26/06/2011 06:57:07 AM
- 553 Views
That's more or less true of virtually everything, not a great example
26/06/2011 07:09:03 AM
- 574 Views
People shouldn't turn their own religion and/or opinion into law
28/06/2011 07:33:48 PM
- 569 Views
I don't recall mentioning religion beyond confirming that I was religious
28/06/2011 08:22:51 PM
- 611 Views
I admit I wasn't replying to you directly
29/06/2011 07:20:10 AM
- 571 Views
I think you should give this subject a bit more thought
29/06/2011 02:16:04 PM
- 614 Views
Believing things without strong supporting evidence is not rational.
30/06/2011 12:11:33 AM
- 672 Views
Requiring different degrees of proof for things isn't particularly rational
30/06/2011 01:14:44 PM
- 739 Views
I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything.
30/06/2011 07:43:51 PM
- 1135 Views
Re: I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything.
30/06/2011 08:59:00 PM
- 748 Views
Re: I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything.
30/06/2011 09:47:30 PM
- 1016 Views
No, I used the word irrational to mean that it's not rational.
30/06/2011 09:12:19 PM
- 598 Views
Re: Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy.
26/06/2011 10:38:56 PM
- 751 Views
I think you should give your fellow citizens a bit more trust and respect
27/06/2011 05:41:52 PM
- 545 Views
My expectations are guided by psychology and history.
28/06/2011 07:08:06 PM
- 653 Views
That's good to know, most of us do that, though we usually just call it common sense and experience
28/06/2011 08:55:23 PM
- 684 Views
No, most people don't do that. Reasoning from cognitive biases and anecdotes is much more common.
30/06/2011 12:18:40 AM
- 592 Views
Empire State Building was lit up in rainbow colors, looked cool *NM*
25/06/2011 08:21:03 PM
- 255 Views
I approved that years ago. They are way behind. Granted, I have no authority over anyone...
26/06/2011 12:22:33 AM
- 476 Views
The real issue is going to be when the Supreme Court rules on the full faith and credit clause.
26/06/2011 02:43:23 PM
- 582 Views