Empire State Building was lit up in rainbow colors, looked cool *NM*
beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 25/06/2011 08:21:03 PM
New York Senate approves same-sex marriage
June 24th, 2011
10:20 PM ET
New York legislators cleared the last major hurdle to legalize same-sex marriage Friday when the state Senate followed the Assembly's lead in approving legislation to do so.
Earlier in the day, the Assembly passed a version of the bill that included an amendment about religious institutions. The Friday night vote in the Senate means the legislation's fate is now in the hands of Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who proposed it.
The Senate vote came after lawmakers agreed on an amendment that would help protect religious institutions from potential lawsuits, Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos said.
Demonstrators have gathered for days in Albany as state lawmakers pored over the details of the bill, which would help make New York the nation's sixth and largest state to legalize same-sex marriage.
The vote on the marriage measure, which the state Assembly passed June 15, was stalled in part by Republican concerns over protections for religious institutions against the potential for litigation.
Cuomo says the bill would grant same-sex couples equal rights to marry "as well as hundreds of rights, benefits and protections that are currently limited to married couples of the opposite sex."
Currently, five states - Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont and New Hampshire - and the District of Columbia grant same-sex marriage licenses.
The passage of same-sex marriage laws faced a daunting history in the New York state legislature.
The Senate rejected a bill to legalize same-sex marriage in 2009 and has blocked the last three attempts by the state's lower house to get the proposed legislation signed into law.
Although New York currently does not grant same-sex marriages, a 2008 appellate court ruling upheld the right of couples to have their same-sex marriages recognized if they are performed elsewhere.
June 24th, 2011
10:20 PM ET
New York legislators cleared the last major hurdle to legalize same-sex marriage Friday when the state Senate followed the Assembly's lead in approving legislation to do so.
Earlier in the day, the Assembly passed a version of the bill that included an amendment about religious institutions. The Friday night vote in the Senate means the legislation's fate is now in the hands of Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who proposed it.
The Senate vote came after lawmakers agreed on an amendment that would help protect religious institutions from potential lawsuits, Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos said.
Demonstrators have gathered for days in Albany as state lawmakers pored over the details of the bill, which would help make New York the nation's sixth and largest state to legalize same-sex marriage.
The vote on the marriage measure, which the state Assembly passed June 15, was stalled in part by Republican concerns over protections for religious institutions against the potential for litigation.
Cuomo says the bill would grant same-sex couples equal rights to marry "as well as hundreds of rights, benefits and protections that are currently limited to married couples of the opposite sex."
Currently, five states - Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont and New Hampshire - and the District of Columbia grant same-sex marriage licenses.
The passage of same-sex marriage laws faced a daunting history in the New York state legislature.
The Senate rejected a bill to legalize same-sex marriage in 2009 and has blocked the last three attempts by the state's lower house to get the proposed legislation signed into law.
Although New York currently does not grant same-sex marriages, a 2008 appellate court ruling upheld the right of couples to have their same-sex marriages recognized if they are performed elsewhere.
I amuse myself.
New York Senate approves same-sex marriage
25/06/2011 03:47:43 AM
- 1157 Views
I'm actually not opposed to this.
25/06/2011 03:48:32 PM
- 546 Views
I'm not sure why there was even any need for such explicit protection.
25/06/2011 04:04:47 PM
- 510 Views
so in your only Catholics are really married?
26/06/2011 12:04:07 AM
- 514 Views
Church Doctrine.
26/06/2011 12:57:39 AM
- 640 Views
That's patently wrong in that Orthodox weddings are explicitly recognized by the Church.
26/06/2011 02:42:00 PM
- 534 Views
Yeah okay...
26/06/2011 05:16:05 PM
- 566 Views
They are outside of the authority of Rome, and have, on occasion, excommunicated Popes.
27/06/2011 05:03:31 PM
- 539 Views
Seems fine to me
25/06/2011 05:44:30 PM
- 501 Views
Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy.
25/06/2011 09:37:28 PM
- 637 Views
Re: Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy.
26/06/2011 03:11:06 AM
- 585 Views
Good luck telling that to the deeply religious right.
26/06/2011 03:20:04 AM
- 489 Views
I am a deeply religious member of the right, and I tell them that all the time *NM*
26/06/2011 03:30:14 AM
- 222 Views
After a number of years of gay marriage
26/06/2011 06:57:07 AM
- 471 Views
That's more or less true of virtually everything, not a great example
26/06/2011 07:09:03 AM
- 507 Views
People shouldn't turn their own religion and/or opinion into law
28/06/2011 07:33:48 PM
- 502 Views
I don't recall mentioning religion beyond confirming that I was religious
28/06/2011 08:22:51 PM
- 539 Views
I admit I wasn't replying to you directly
29/06/2011 07:20:10 AM
- 496 Views
I think you should give this subject a bit more thought
29/06/2011 02:16:04 PM
- 538 Views
Believing things without strong supporting evidence is not rational.
30/06/2011 12:11:33 AM
- 602 Views
Requiring different degrees of proof for things isn't particularly rational
30/06/2011 01:14:44 PM
- 673 Views
I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything.
30/06/2011 07:43:51 PM
- 1047 Views
Re: I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything.
30/06/2011 08:59:00 PM
- 682 Views
Re: I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything.
30/06/2011 09:47:30 PM
- 946 Views
No, I used the word irrational to mean that it's not rational.
30/06/2011 09:12:19 PM
- 526 Views
Re: Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy.
26/06/2011 10:38:56 PM
- 673 Views
I think you should give your fellow citizens a bit more trust and respect
27/06/2011 05:41:52 PM
- 471 Views
My expectations are guided by psychology and history.
28/06/2011 07:08:06 PM
- 577 Views
That's good to know, most of us do that, though we usually just call it common sense and experience
28/06/2011 08:55:23 PM
- 621 Views
No, most people don't do that. Reasoning from cognitive biases and anecdotes is much more common.
30/06/2011 12:18:40 AM
- 529 Views
Empire State Building was lit up in rainbow colors, looked cool *NM*
25/06/2011 08:21:03 PM
- 230 Views
I approved that years ago. They are way behind. Granted, I have no authority over anyone...
26/06/2011 12:22:33 AM
- 408 Views
The real issue is going to be when the Supreme Court rules on the full faith and credit clause.
26/06/2011 02:43:23 PM
- 514 Views