Active Users:836 Time:13/11/2024 05:58:38 AM
Which again, is something that sounds nice and spiritual, but doesn't actually make any sense beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 11/06/2011 03:46:51 PM

It does, it's been blessed! The special property is that it has been blessed by a priest, and because of that it is a more potent symbol. Sprinkling holy water is primarily supposed to remind one of the baptismal promises and thus a person's relationship with God. Blessing the water makes this aspect more pronounced - a clearer visible symbol of an invisible reality.



It comes back to the same argument. Either the water is special, or it's psychological.

If the only benefit of blessed water is psychological- that is, "Ooh, the priest blessed this water, so I'm even MORE focused on purity and health and life, which are the symbols water evokes," then, again it DOESN'T ACTUALLY DO ANYTHING. It's just a mental trick, the equivalent of Dumbo's feather to get people in the mood.


If the water actually is special- i.e. favored by God, "magic water," - then using it in rites does have an effect- you feel closer to God, prayers are more likely to be heard, etc. I'm pretty sure any priest would deny that this is the case (though I could be wrong).




Basically, you're saying that holy water is a "more potent symbol" than regular water. But the strength of any symbol is in our minds. For example, a Jewish person would find a yarmulke a symbol of their religion, whereas Gentile tend to think they look kind of silly. The swastika has a very different meaning in the West than the East. Symbols have no intrinsic meaning, they are what we tell them to be.


So. Since the concept of holy water is just a psychological aid, I've always found it a bit ridiculous. I can just as easily go "Ah, God created this water, I will dunk my baby in it so his sins are symbolically washed away."
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
A question on baptism - 10/06/2011 09:21:44 AM 898 Views
To my knowledge, baptism does not stem from the Resurrection. - 10/06/2011 11:01:17 AM 652 Views
What I meant - 10/06/2011 11:03:08 AM 496 Views
I don't follow. - 10/06/2011 11:08:07 AM 468 Views
Re: I don't follow. - 10/06/2011 11:10:40 AM 558 Views
I don't keep up with RC theology much. - 10/06/2011 11:15:52 AM 451 Views
Re: I don't keep up with RC theology much. - 10/06/2011 11:17:53 AM 454 Views
You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:50:53 AM 487 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:52:27 AM 436 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:55:01 AM 487 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:58:36 AM 462 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:16:46 PM 605 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:19:16 PM 462 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:25:08 PM 666 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:26:30 PM 663 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:28:45 PM 470 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:29:43 PM 496 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:33:01 PM 365 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:34:36 PM 430 Views
I took a holy dip into the Ganges - 10/06/2011 11:48:26 AM 558 Views
Re: I took a holy dip into the Ganges - 10/06/2011 11:54:17 AM 617 Views
He dances and dips in The Ganges- Very Nice. *NM* - 11/06/2011 02:15:41 AM 207 Views
Three dips - that's the ceremony. - 11/06/2011 02:35:43 AM 423 Views
Early Christians and Jews were obsessed with purity - 10/06/2011 12:56:58 PM 594 Views
Oh, I know about the historical/academic/anthropological reason - 10/06/2011 01:04:43 PM 531 Views
I misunderstood, lets try again - 10/06/2011 01:44:43 PM 610 Views
Huh. *NM* - 10/06/2011 02:06:58 PM 251 Views
A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:09:32 PM 656 Views
Re: A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:15:07 PM 627 Views
Re: A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:19:25 PM 561 Views
Do you want a theological answer or a historical one? - 10/06/2011 03:16:44 PM 626 Views
The theological. I already had a fairly good idea of the historical - 10/06/2011 03:18:51 PM 499 Views
My favorite fact about baptism is that is REQUIRES water... but it can be ANY water - 10/06/2011 04:31:12 PM 592 Views
That is absurd. - 10/06/2011 08:37:13 PM 684 Views
It is absurd - 10/06/2011 08:56:19 PM 496 Views
When your post is eviscerated, resorting to "HURR RELIGION IS DUMB" isn't a winning move. - 10/06/2011 10:00:39 PM 616 Views
Psh.You can dress it up with spiritualism and semantics, but the concept boils down to "magic water" - 11/06/2011 03:56:03 AM 440 Views
The point is that it's a symbol. - 11/06/2011 04:45:19 AM 468 Views
I have no problem with water as a symbol - 11/06/2011 04:59:52 AM 538 Views
You are totally missing the point. - 11/06/2011 02:46:08 PM 620 Views
Which again, is something that sounds nice and spiritual, but doesn't actually make any sense - 11/06/2011 03:46:51 PM 586 Views
your problem is you're trying to apply objective logic to religion - 11/06/2011 04:13:01 PM 840 Views
I'm not, exactly. Religion has internal logic. For example, certain things are "unclean" - 11/06/2011 04:40:33 PM 486 Views
Beliefs about holy water are internally logical. - 11/06/2011 07:36:08 PM 528 Views
Shrug. It was on topic. - 11/06/2011 08:06:16 PM 809 Views
Baptism is almost, if not entirely, symbolic. - 11/06/2011 10:23:02 AM 646 Views
Re: Baptism is almost, if not entirely, symbolic. - 11/06/2011 11:51:22 AM 657 Views
I never thought of it in that way, that is why I like this site *NM* - 12/06/2011 04:26:40 PM 229 Views
Because we are all nuts in our own special ways? *NM* - 12/06/2011 04:36:03 PM 198 Views

Reply to Message