Active Users:1060 Time:13/11/2024 06:08:37 AM
I have no problem with water as a symbol beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 11/06/2011 04:59:52 AM
My issue is that all the things that "holy water" is supposed to symbolize are the same things that regular water symbolizes.

So, if it's just a symbol, then that means it's your frame of mind that matters. If you're about to bless yourself with holy water and pray to God, it's not going to be somehow a less effective prayer if a dastardly villain has swapped out a bottle of Evian into the font. As long as you're in a prayerful state of mind, that's what counts- the water supposedly just helps you get there.


So if it's not the physical substance, but the state of mind that's important, then it follows that the physical substance is NOT important. That is, if you can achieve the same sincere, prayerful state of mind with some beads, some music, or a cup of Ramen, then everything should be just as good.





So. Now we know that the physical substance doesn't matter- all that matters is that it gets you into the right frame of mind. Holy water makes one think of purity, of life, of being refreshed. So does regular water.


Therefore, there's no reason why "normal" water (that is, not water that has been shit in, Ghav) couldn't be used in whatever rites supposedly demand "holy" water.




(Now, this all falls apart if you say that the physical substance does have some importance. But if that's the case, then we're back to "magic water," that is, water that has special properties that regular water does not.)
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
A question on baptism - 10/06/2011 09:21:44 AM 899 Views
To my knowledge, baptism does not stem from the Resurrection. - 10/06/2011 11:01:17 AM 653 Views
What I meant - 10/06/2011 11:03:08 AM 497 Views
I don't follow. - 10/06/2011 11:08:07 AM 468 Views
Re: I don't follow. - 10/06/2011 11:10:40 AM 559 Views
I don't keep up with RC theology much. - 10/06/2011 11:15:52 AM 452 Views
Re: I don't keep up with RC theology much. - 10/06/2011 11:17:53 AM 455 Views
You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:50:53 AM 487 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:52:27 AM 437 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:55:01 AM 488 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:58:36 AM 464 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:16:46 PM 606 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:19:16 PM 463 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:25:08 PM 667 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:26:30 PM 664 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:28:45 PM 470 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:29:43 PM 497 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:33:01 PM 365 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:34:36 PM 431 Views
I took a holy dip into the Ganges - 10/06/2011 11:48:26 AM 559 Views
Re: I took a holy dip into the Ganges - 10/06/2011 11:54:17 AM 618 Views
He dances and dips in The Ganges- Very Nice. *NM* - 11/06/2011 02:15:41 AM 208 Views
Three dips - that's the ceremony. - 11/06/2011 02:35:43 AM 424 Views
Early Christians and Jews were obsessed with purity - 10/06/2011 12:56:58 PM 594 Views
Oh, I know about the historical/academic/anthropological reason - 10/06/2011 01:04:43 PM 532 Views
I misunderstood, lets try again - 10/06/2011 01:44:43 PM 610 Views
Huh. *NM* - 10/06/2011 02:06:58 PM 252 Views
A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:09:32 PM 657 Views
Re: A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:15:07 PM 628 Views
Re: A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:19:25 PM 561 Views
Do you want a theological answer or a historical one? - 10/06/2011 03:16:44 PM 627 Views
The theological. I already had a fairly good idea of the historical - 10/06/2011 03:18:51 PM 500 Views
My favorite fact about baptism is that is REQUIRES water... but it can be ANY water - 10/06/2011 04:31:12 PM 592 Views
That is absurd. - 10/06/2011 08:37:13 PM 685 Views
It is absurd - 10/06/2011 08:56:19 PM 497 Views
When your post is eviscerated, resorting to "HURR RELIGION IS DUMB" isn't a winning move. - 10/06/2011 10:00:39 PM 616 Views
Psh.You can dress it up with spiritualism and semantics, but the concept boils down to "magic water" - 11/06/2011 03:56:03 AM 441 Views
The point is that it's a symbol. - 11/06/2011 04:45:19 AM 469 Views
I have no problem with water as a symbol - 11/06/2011 04:59:52 AM 539 Views
You are totally missing the point. - 11/06/2011 02:46:08 PM 621 Views
Which again, is something that sounds nice and spiritual, but doesn't actually make any sense - 11/06/2011 03:46:51 PM 586 Views
your problem is you're trying to apply objective logic to religion - 11/06/2011 04:13:01 PM 841 Views
I'm not, exactly. Religion has internal logic. For example, certain things are "unclean" - 11/06/2011 04:40:33 PM 487 Views
Beliefs about holy water are internally logical. - 11/06/2011 07:36:08 PM 529 Views
Shrug. It was on topic. - 11/06/2011 08:06:16 PM 810 Views
Baptism is almost, if not entirely, symbolic. - 11/06/2011 10:23:02 AM 647 Views
Re: Baptism is almost, if not entirely, symbolic. - 11/06/2011 11:51:22 AM 657 Views
I never thought of it in that way, that is why I like this site *NM* - 12/06/2011 04:26:40 PM 229 Views
Because we are all nuts in our own special ways? *NM* - 12/06/2011 04:36:03 PM 199 Views

Reply to Message