Active Users:924 Time:13/11/2024 06:00:21 AM
That is absurd. Tom Send a noteboard - 10/06/2011 08:37:13 PM
Just because your Sunday School teacher was not smart enough to realize the means through which baptism is accomplished doesn't mean that saliva is a valid form of baptism.

The Orthodox Church only recognizes full immersion in a running body of water or a font of clean water which has been blessed with holy oil. This was mentioned in the Didache - "Baptize in living (i.e., running) water in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. If it is not possible to use living water, one may use other water." The standard procedure is to bless the font with oil used for anointing, to bless the water and to completely immerse the child in the font (adult-sized fonts are usually found only at monasteries or cathedrals).

The Catholic Church requires that the water be sanctified as well, though it usually permits baptism by pouring water over the head. From the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Paragraph 1278 - Ritus essentialis Baptismi consistit in immersione candidati in aquam vel in aquae infusione super caput eius... . The blessing of the water is essential, however: From Paragraph 1238 - Aqua baptismalis deinde (sive in momento, ipso sive in Vigilia Paschali) per Epiclesis consecratur orationem.

Neither the Catholic nor the Orthodox Church will permit any water to be blessed that is not clean and from a clean source (such as a well, tap water or clean running water).

The Anglican Church likewise requires a sanctification of the water, which is set forth in the Book of Common Prayer - "sanctify this Water to the mystical washing away of sin". I am aware that Lutherans follow a very similar procedure.

What the crazy churches do is their own business.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
A question on baptism - 10/06/2011 09:21:44 AM 899 Views
To my knowledge, baptism does not stem from the Resurrection. - 10/06/2011 11:01:17 AM 652 Views
What I meant - 10/06/2011 11:03:08 AM 497 Views
I don't follow. - 10/06/2011 11:08:07 AM 468 Views
Re: I don't follow. - 10/06/2011 11:10:40 AM 559 Views
I don't keep up with RC theology much. - 10/06/2011 11:15:52 AM 451 Views
Re: I don't keep up with RC theology much. - 10/06/2011 11:17:53 AM 454 Views
You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:50:53 AM 487 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:52:27 AM 436 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:55:01 AM 487 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:58:36 AM 462 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:16:46 PM 605 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:19:16 PM 462 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:25:08 PM 666 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:26:30 PM 663 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:28:45 PM 470 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:29:43 PM 497 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:33:01 PM 365 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:34:36 PM 430 Views
I took a holy dip into the Ganges - 10/06/2011 11:48:26 AM 558 Views
Re: I took a holy dip into the Ganges - 10/06/2011 11:54:17 AM 617 Views
He dances and dips in The Ganges- Very Nice. *NM* - 11/06/2011 02:15:41 AM 208 Views
Three dips - that's the ceremony. - 11/06/2011 02:35:43 AM 423 Views
Early Christians and Jews were obsessed with purity - 10/06/2011 12:56:58 PM 594 Views
Oh, I know about the historical/academic/anthropological reason - 10/06/2011 01:04:43 PM 531 Views
I misunderstood, lets try again - 10/06/2011 01:44:43 PM 610 Views
Huh. *NM* - 10/06/2011 02:06:58 PM 251 Views
A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:09:32 PM 657 Views
Re: A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:15:07 PM 628 Views
Re: A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:19:25 PM 561 Views
Do you want a theological answer or a historical one? - 10/06/2011 03:16:44 PM 626 Views
The theological. I already had a fairly good idea of the historical - 10/06/2011 03:18:51 PM 499 Views
My favorite fact about baptism is that is REQUIRES water... but it can be ANY water - 10/06/2011 04:31:12 PM 592 Views
That is absurd. - 10/06/2011 08:37:13 PM 685 Views
It is absurd - 10/06/2011 08:56:19 PM 496 Views
When your post is eviscerated, resorting to "HURR RELIGION IS DUMB" isn't a winning move. - 10/06/2011 10:00:39 PM 616 Views
Psh.You can dress it up with spiritualism and semantics, but the concept boils down to "magic water" - 11/06/2011 03:56:03 AM 440 Views
The point is that it's a symbol. - 11/06/2011 04:45:19 AM 468 Views
I have no problem with water as a symbol - 11/06/2011 04:59:52 AM 538 Views
You are totally missing the point. - 11/06/2011 02:46:08 PM 620 Views
Which again, is something that sounds nice and spiritual, but doesn't actually make any sense - 11/06/2011 03:46:51 PM 586 Views
your problem is you're trying to apply objective logic to religion - 11/06/2011 04:13:01 PM 841 Views
I'm not, exactly. Religion has internal logic. For example, certain things are "unclean" - 11/06/2011 04:40:33 PM 486 Views
Beliefs about holy water are internally logical. - 11/06/2011 07:36:08 PM 528 Views
Shrug. It was on topic. - 11/06/2011 08:06:16 PM 810 Views
Baptism is almost, if not entirely, symbolic. - 11/06/2011 10:23:02 AM 646 Views
Re: Baptism is almost, if not entirely, symbolic. - 11/06/2011 11:51:22 AM 657 Views
I never thought of it in that way, that is why I like this site *NM* - 12/06/2011 04:26:40 PM 229 Views
Because we are all nuts in our own special ways? *NM* - 12/06/2011 04:36:03 PM 199 Views

Reply to Message