Active Users:855 Time:13/11/2024 05:58:54 AM
A first responce Bramhodoulos Send a noteboard - 10/06/2011 02:09:32 PM
This is something that started bugging me after a random association yesterday. John the Baptist. On whose authority was he baptising people? No one had died for people's sins yet. From what I understand baptism functions in connection with that. Have I misunderstood something?

And why did Jesus need to be baptised?
I am genuinely curious about the doctrinal reasoning here. It has been a while since I studied these things and for the life of me I cannot remember anything about it. I know that there were several Jewish groups that practised baptism at the time, but I do not know the intra-Christian reasoning for this event.


As a theologian I must say I havn't been doing a lot of research after this, but the first thing I would say would be that whatever view on baptism christians have today (there are some differences on the precise theological importance between Roman Catholics, Reformed (Calvinistic), Lutheran and Baptist churches), it is clear for most people that John the Baptist baptized in a different way.

He basically told people to start living more holy, according to the law of Moses, with a huge emphasis on simply being "honest" (he didn't appear to have a well thought-out ethical system).
As an outward sign of this new way of living, this change of lifestyle, a baptism was mainly focused leaving the past behind and living better lives now. There was probably only a limited theory of salvation involved.

Why Jesus? Noone can probably give a full answer, only that it was "fitting" so that "all righteousness be fulfulled" (Mat.3:15). What all of that involves may take a few years to study, but that was Jesus' answer anyway.
Reply to message
A question on baptism - 10/06/2011 09:21:44 AM 898 Views
To my knowledge, baptism does not stem from the Resurrection. - 10/06/2011 11:01:17 AM 652 Views
What I meant - 10/06/2011 11:03:08 AM 496 Views
I don't follow. - 10/06/2011 11:08:07 AM 468 Views
Re: I don't follow. - 10/06/2011 11:10:40 AM 558 Views
I don't keep up with RC theology much. - 10/06/2011 11:15:52 AM 451 Views
Re: I don't keep up with RC theology much. - 10/06/2011 11:17:53 AM 454 Views
You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:50:53 AM 487 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:52:27 AM 436 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:55:01 AM 487 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:58:36 AM 462 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:16:46 PM 605 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:19:16 PM 462 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:25:08 PM 666 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:26:30 PM 663 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:28:45 PM 470 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:29:43 PM 497 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:33:01 PM 365 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:34:36 PM 430 Views
I took a holy dip into the Ganges - 10/06/2011 11:48:26 AM 558 Views
Re: I took a holy dip into the Ganges - 10/06/2011 11:54:17 AM 617 Views
He dances and dips in The Ganges- Very Nice. *NM* - 11/06/2011 02:15:41 AM 207 Views
Three dips - that's the ceremony. - 11/06/2011 02:35:43 AM 423 Views
Early Christians and Jews were obsessed with purity - 10/06/2011 12:56:58 PM 594 Views
Oh, I know about the historical/academic/anthropological reason - 10/06/2011 01:04:43 PM 531 Views
I misunderstood, lets try again - 10/06/2011 01:44:43 PM 610 Views
Huh. *NM* - 10/06/2011 02:06:58 PM 251 Views
A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:09:32 PM 657 Views
Re: A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:15:07 PM 627 Views
Re: A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:19:25 PM 561 Views
Do you want a theological answer or a historical one? - 10/06/2011 03:16:44 PM 626 Views
The theological. I already had a fairly good idea of the historical - 10/06/2011 03:18:51 PM 499 Views
My favorite fact about baptism is that is REQUIRES water... but it can be ANY water - 10/06/2011 04:31:12 PM 592 Views
That is absurd. - 10/06/2011 08:37:13 PM 684 Views
It is absurd - 10/06/2011 08:56:19 PM 496 Views
When your post is eviscerated, resorting to "HURR RELIGION IS DUMB" isn't a winning move. - 10/06/2011 10:00:39 PM 616 Views
Psh.You can dress it up with spiritualism and semantics, but the concept boils down to "magic water" - 11/06/2011 03:56:03 AM 440 Views
The point is that it's a symbol. - 11/06/2011 04:45:19 AM 468 Views
I have no problem with water as a symbol - 11/06/2011 04:59:52 AM 538 Views
You are totally missing the point. - 11/06/2011 02:46:08 PM 620 Views
Which again, is something that sounds nice and spiritual, but doesn't actually make any sense - 11/06/2011 03:46:51 PM 586 Views
your problem is you're trying to apply objective logic to religion - 11/06/2011 04:13:01 PM 841 Views
I'm not, exactly. Religion has internal logic. For example, certain things are "unclean" - 11/06/2011 04:40:33 PM 486 Views
Beliefs about holy water are internally logical. - 11/06/2011 07:36:08 PM 528 Views
Shrug. It was on topic. - 11/06/2011 08:06:16 PM 809 Views
Baptism is almost, if not entirely, symbolic. - 11/06/2011 10:23:02 AM 646 Views
Re: Baptism is almost, if not entirely, symbolic. - 11/06/2011 11:51:22 AM 657 Views
I never thought of it in that way, that is why I like this site *NM* - 12/06/2011 04:26:40 PM 229 Views
Because we are all nuts in our own special ways? *NM* - 12/06/2011 04:36:03 PM 198 Views

Reply to Message