Active Users:1162 Time:22/11/2024 08:31:06 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I thought about it, but didn't dare. Joel Send a noteboard - 26/05/2011 06:14:45 PM
It was fairly cool. I tested Sherlock Holmes, lilac, Terry Pratchett and Douglas Adams, and all came in between 10 and 24. And then someone seems to have sabotaged it by editing the mathematics pages, it seems, so now there is a loop.

If I start clicking through philosophy links on Wikipedia I'll spend the day there.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
So, how many have tried the claim in today's xkcd text? Camilla - 25/05/2011 05:39:55 PM 981 Views
I did. Kaldric - 25/05/2011 06:13:05 PM 642 Views
Apparently i have a different xkcd.. MightyYT - 25/05/2011 06:38:14 PM 571 Views
They're talking about the rollover text *NM* Sareitha Sedai - 25/05/2011 06:41:18 PM 274 Views
I never knew there was roll over text on xkcd. Yeah for more enjoyment of xkcd! *NM* MightyYT - 25/05/2011 07:18:27 PM 299 Views
So you've missed half the jokes on xkcd? *NM* jh - 25/05/2011 09:14:50 PM 238 Views
Indeed Camilla - 25/05/2011 11:00:38 PM 518 Views
Hahah oh wow! Rollover text is basically just as important to xkcd beetnemesis - 26/05/2011 04:41:42 AM 547 Views
Dang. The roll over is the best part in many cases. *NM* Hobo - 26/05/2011 07:44:43 PM 289 Views
Me! Monique - 25/05/2011 07:22:50 PM 733 Views
Yeah. Someone sabotaged the "Facts" article beetnemesis - 25/05/2011 07:29:45 PM 597 Views
I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is... beetnemesis - 25/05/2011 07:28:48 PM 590 Views
Re: I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is... Camilla - 25/05/2011 10:58:02 PM 564 Views
Re: I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is... moondog - 26/05/2011 02:42:10 AM 528 Views
Ferenc Puskas didn't work. Stephen - 25/05/2011 07:39:31 PM 539 Views
For the future, it would be helpful to cite what you're talking about. Not all of us read xkcd. Tom - 25/05/2011 08:23:15 PM 645 Views
If you find it retarded, why do you care? *NM* Helene - 25/05/2011 09:22:49 PM 282 Views
... only it isn't [retarded] *NM* Aeryn - 25/05/2011 10:23:59 PM 340 Views
It's gotten pretty bad. The science jokes are funny, but Randall doesn't know much of anything else. *NM* Ghavrel - 26/05/2011 01:18:19 AM 275 Views
Even the science jokes are kinda meh Isaac - 26/05/2011 01:43:22 AM 619 Views
I loved xkcd up until about a year ago. Aemon - 26/05/2011 04:07:04 AM 604 Views
I should have clarified that it did seem good a few years ago. I agree with that. *NM* Tom - 26/05/2011 04:55:37 AM 250 Views
... *NM* Camilla - 25/05/2011 11:27:59 PM 255 Views
*NM* globug0822 - 26/05/2011 06:50:49 AM 278 Views
Took 23 or so clicks... globug0822 - 26/05/2011 06:50:01 AM 579 Views
I thought about it, but didn't dare. Joel - 26/05/2011 06:14:45 PM 637 Views
Huh. Hobo - 26/05/2011 07:50:31 PM 618 Views
Re: Huh. Camilla - 26/05/2011 09:21:26 PM 640 Views
Random words I see around the house... Danu - 26/05/2011 08:05:05 PM 563 Views
Not me. aerocontrols - 26/05/2011 11:18:57 PM 558 Views
It worked this time! *NM* Monique - 30/05/2011 10:10:47 PM 351 Views
Yes, I think someone fixed it back to the way it was. *NM* Camilla - 30/05/2011 10:12:29 PM 275 Views
At first I thought you meant today's comic. Tim - 30/05/2011 11:16:54 PM 876 Views
That would have been very impressive Camilla - 30/05/2011 11:42:35 PM 602 Views
Yes, I noticed the date shortly afterwards. Tim - 31/05/2011 08:42:27 AM 542 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes