But I have a problem with this tactic being used against muslims who have the unfortunate luck of knowing someone the government doesnt like. And there was a case where the son of a cleric the US doesnt like who was being tracked with a gps under his car that he pulled out when he saw it. And sure you can say well they have to watch him cuz you never know who is and isnt a terrorist but that goes for everyone then. We should all be required to have gps on our cars and even our bodies because who knows, maybe i could rob a persons house tomorrow and you could be planning a rape. and My neighbor could be planning on burning down a mosque/church/synagogue.
Cops have followed suspects for years and that is considered legal. This is just a more high tech way of doing it. Sorry but your car on a public road is not someplace you should have an expectation of privacy. If it is illegal to have sex someplace you should assume you don't have privacy.
The argument that this guts the 4th amendment is pure hyperbole. There have always been very few places where you could expect priviacy. The word private is where the key here, if you are in public it isn't private.
The argument that this guts the 4th amendment is pure hyperbole. There have always been very few places where you could expect priviacy. The word private is where the key here, if you are in public it isn't private.
Aisha - formerly known as randschicka
secret GPS tracking upheld as legal practice
16/05/2011 02:37:14 PM
- 823 Views
How do they expect honest criminals to make a living with rules like this?
16/05/2011 06:24:45 PM
- 433 Views
sure this example is about convicted robbers
16/05/2011 06:42:51 PM
- 405 Views
I will have a problem when I see innocent people being targeted for no reason
16/05/2011 09:17:22 PM
- 388 Views
so get a warrant if these guys are such threats to society
17/05/2011 12:57:51 AM
- 390 Views
once again privacy takes place in private not in public. That is sorta where the word comes from
17/05/2011 02:23:05 PM
- 400 Views
the constitution guarantees the right of privacy to all, not just law abiding citizens
16/05/2011 09:14:24 PM
- 388 Views
where does it say that? It should be real easy to point to since it is in the constiution
16/05/2011 09:21:19 PM
- 449 Views
4th amendment
17/05/2011 12:55:00 AM
- 431 Views
Re: 4th amendment
17/05/2011 03:13:13 AM
- 395 Views
Re: 4th amendment
17/05/2011 03:28:36 AM
- 422 Views
Re: 4th amendment
17/05/2011 03:58:49 AM
- 394 Views
try reading it again it doesn't have the word privacy in it
17/05/2011 02:42:44 PM
- 411 Views
how is surveillance not a type of search? *NM*
17/05/2011 09:25:27 PM
- 216 Views
how is different if it is done by GPS or tailing them in a car? *NM*
17/05/2011 10:00:53 PM
- 176 Views
it's not different -- if they get a warrant first
18/05/2011 01:50:13 AM
- 397 Views