Active Users:505 Time:09/04/2026 06:39:37 AM
You make a very important but too often overlooked point. Joel Send a noteboard - 14/05/2011 01:54:40 AM
Which I guess makes it no surprise it's overlooked here.
So what? You seem to have a very poor understanding of the nature of faith and salvation if that's your attitude. The forgiveness of sins by Christ is founded on the penitence of the sinner. Jesus said to the adulteress, "Go, and sin no more", not "Go, and keep doing what you've been doing". While every human is a sinner in Christian doctrine, there is a difference between sinning and asking for forgiveness, and trying not to sin again, and being comfortable with sin and professing it to not be a sin. That is pretty much the standard definition of an unrepentant sinner no matter what denomination you belong to. If the priest is a homosexual who tries to refrain from acting on his urges, then he's no different than the priest who struggles with any other sin. It's when he claims that what he's doing is okay that he has crossed a line, and a very clear one at that.

That's the core of it, yet alarmingly easy to miss. It cuts both ways of course; some very strict denominations practically deny the possibility of repentance when church members sin, so people only have to screw up once to be permanently ostracized whatever they do subsequently. Yet on the other end of the spectrum are churches that seem to feel something as trivial as unrepentant sin shouldn't be a barrier to fellowship with God (which is totally the churchs call, right? ;)) My experience has been that both phenomena are most prevalent with BAC churches, where the Sinners Prayer, an alter call, dunking or whatever rite of passage they endorse somehow makes people immune to sin, and any subsequent sins are either treated as proof the young Christian was insincere or unclean, or dismissed because they can't have sinned; they're CHRISTIANS. Of course, this overlooks another scriptural point on which Paul is explicit in multiple places; had he the luxury of putting his life on autopilot once he accepted Christ he wouldn't have spoken of "finishing the race" or "perfection in Christ" as a process rather than an instantaneous event.

*returns from tangent* :P
The point is, if someone objects to a basic and enduring Church statement that a given act is sinful, but nonetheless commits it and means to continue, the solution is not conforming the Church to their wishes, but a religion (if any) that condones them. Just because a Christian desires something that the Church condemns doesn't mean the Holy Spirit is conveniently telling them the Church is wrong and their desire right; as you correctly note, that's the nature of a Christians struggle against sin, one the Church teaches is impossible for anyone to win apart from Christ. I realize there's a popular view that Christianity is "slavery to Christ", but within the Church I thought it well established that slavery to sin is NOT Christianity. It's one thing to err, repent, be forgiven in Grace and try to be righteous henceforth, and quite another to revel in error while calling it Gods will.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Presbyterian Church (USA) passes Amendment 10-A. - 11/05/2011 05:39:29 PM 1505 Views
*NM* - 11/05/2011 06:10:26 PM 365 Views
I am happy to see this. *NM* - 11/05/2011 07:22:59 PM 394 Views
Homosexuals must die! - 11/05/2011 08:25:25 PM 1174 Views
I agree! This sort of behavior can NOT be excused!!! - 11/05/2011 10:38:16 PM 824 Views
Yay!!. - 11/05/2011 10:38:51 PM 1099 Views
Glad to hear it. *NM* - 11/05/2011 10:46:39 PM 451 Views
Well done. *NM* - 11/05/2011 11:07:22 PM 395 Views
What's the language? Did they at least TRY to give a doctrinal justification? - 12/05/2011 02:10:46 AM 1084 Views
Thank you for that rousing argument against married priests. - 12/05/2011 03:36:51 AM 1009 Views
Why ARE you letting women into the priesthood? - 12/05/2011 04:16:50 AM 932 Views
Because Episcopalians don't listen to the Bible much. - 12/05/2011 05:47:03 AM 871 Views
That's just fine as far as I'm concerned - 12/05/2011 02:23:44 PM 903 Views
Yes, I suppose a church could go that route. - 14/05/2011 07:38:02 AM 847 Views
I'm not attempting to impose a dichotomy on the Bible. - 14/05/2011 03:25:30 PM 923 Views
I don't even know what following the Bible in its entirety means. - 14/05/2011 09:09:10 PM 1085 Views
As an exercise, I tried to think of how I would justify allowing homosexuals as clergy. - 14/05/2011 04:19:43 PM 916 Views
Wow. - 20/05/2011 10:15:21 AM 936 Views
Thanks (I'm actually OK with women priests though). - 12/05/2011 07:09:11 AM 971 Views
It's more a question of interpretational standards. - 12/05/2011 02:29:43 PM 859 Views
Agreed. - 14/05/2011 01:17:45 AM 935 Views
They did so, via negativa. - 12/05/2011 04:22:17 PM 1053 Views
Your church has a constitution?! - 12/05/2011 03:36:41 AM 918 Views
My Church has a congress! *NM* - 12/05/2011 03:37:52 AM 439 Views
Haha no way! *NM* - 12/05/2011 03:46:32 AM 398 Views
We have a General Assembly and a Moderator. - 12/05/2011 04:18:34 PM 1018 Views
I had no idea the US was based on that system. - 12/05/2011 06:22:58 PM 857 Views
It is pretty common practice - 12/05/2011 06:54:02 PM 888 Views
Oh I'm sure it is with newer churches. - 12/05/2011 10:49:11 PM 951 Views
I'm happy to hear this, personally. I also wonder how you reconcile this with the Bible. - 12/05/2011 04:11:31 AM 1087 Views
Every direct reference to homosexuality in the Bible is a reference to rape. - 12/05/2011 04:12:43 PM 921 Views
Every single word that you wrote in your response is complete bullshit. - 12/05/2011 05:50:07 PM 1054 Views
Knock off your eisegesis, try some exegesis - 12/05/2011 07:02:45 PM 957 Views
I'm trying to figure out just what your "gifts" are, because I don't see any. - 12/05/2011 07:30:39 PM 929 Views
Oh, is that how we're playing this, then? - 13/05/2011 06:29:31 PM 941 Views
Re: Oh, is that how we're playing this, then? - 13/05/2011 07:02:35 PM 921 Views
I'm not playing. I'm pointing out some glaring errors on your part. - 13/05/2011 07:25:08 PM 845 Views
Danny will correct me if I'm wrong, but... - 13/05/2011 09:55:14 PM 1038 Views
Danny persistently refuses to say that - 13/05/2011 10:13:55 PM 971 Views
And with respect to your textual point, once again you're wrong - 12/05/2011 07:44:10 PM 1060 Views
You're a fucking moron. *NM* - 15/05/2011 11:11:08 PM 422 Views
You make a very important but too often overlooked point. - 14/05/2011 01:54:40 AM 1048 Views
??? the bible was harsher on homosexulaity than on rape - 12/05/2011 06:56:43 PM 901 Views
Read Judges. - 12/05/2011 07:17:29 PM 908 Views
Another example... - 12/05/2011 09:19:52 AM 828 Views
That's what people said about churches opposing slavery. - 12/05/2011 04:06:26 PM 894 Views
I rest my case *NM* - 12/05/2011 04:48:32 PM 389 Views
That is a false dichotomy and we both know it. - 14/05/2011 02:07:19 AM 887 Views
If you claim to follow the entire Bible, then you are completely correct. - 12/05/2011 06:04:38 PM 827 Views
On the contrary, this move will take some butts out of the seats. - 12/05/2011 07:16:22 PM 881 Views
We both know that isn't the case - 12/05/2011 07:55:41 PM 987 Views
Whatever your issue is, get over it. - 13/05/2011 06:17:26 PM 843 Views
You'd be a lot more effective... - 13/05/2011 06:45:31 PM 960 Views
You haven't adequately expressed your theology - 13/05/2011 07:28:54 PM 940 Views
Cool cool. I have a question on a semi-related note, about Protestant Gospels - 12/05/2011 05:33:49 PM 940 Views
Since I haven't gotten around to asking yet... - 13/05/2011 07:14:01 PM 853 Views
Re: Since I haven't gotten around to asking yet... - 15/05/2011 03:18:23 PM 1264 Views

Reply to Message