The Catholics and Eastern Orthodox Churches accept Judith as part of Scripture.
Tom Send a noteboard - 12/05/2011 07:51:27 PM
My point is that the Protestants have only taken away from Scripture.
There had been debate about the canonicity of these particular books because they are "Old Testament" books but not recognized by the Jews as part of their Scripture. They were, however, included in the Septuagint when the Hebrew Bible was translated into Greek in roughly 300 BC in Alexandria. As a result, they were included in the Bible because when it was "compiled" (actually the result of common acceptance, with some minor changes, of a list that was originally sent out by Athanasius, bishop of Alexandria, of the New Testament, with the Septuagint tacked on) it was part of the Septuagint and that was taken as the "Hebrew scriptures".
As a result, the Protestants just jettisoned the books that they thought never should have been put in. As to how the books got put in originally, the Old Testament is the result of Jewish scholars over the years choosing by means unknown to us and the New Testament was, as I said, largely the result of what Athanasius had said.
There had been debate about the canonicity of these particular books because they are "Old Testament" books but not recognized by the Jews as part of their Scripture. They were, however, included in the Septuagint when the Hebrew Bible was translated into Greek in roughly 300 BC in Alexandria. As a result, they were included in the Bible because when it was "compiled" (actually the result of common acceptance, with some minor changes, of a list that was originally sent out by Athanasius, bishop of Alexandria, of the New Testament, with the Septuagint tacked on) it was part of the Septuagint and that was taken as the "Hebrew scriptures".
As a result, the Protestants just jettisoned the books that they thought never should have been put in. As to how the books got put in originally, the Old Testament is the result of Jewish scholars over the years choosing by means unknown to us and the New Testament was, as I said, largely the result of what Athanasius had said.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
This message last edited by Tom on 12/05/2011 at 07:58:22 PM
Presbyterian Church (USA) passes Amendment 10-A.
- 11/05/2011 05:39:29 PM
1334 Views
*NM*
What's the language? Did they at least TRY to give a doctrinal justification?
- 12/05/2011 02:10:46 AM
835 Views
Thank you for that rousing argument against married priests.
- 12/05/2011 03:36:51 AM
823 Views
Why ARE you letting women into the priesthood?
- 12/05/2011 04:16:50 AM
770 Views
Because Episcopalians don't listen to the Bible much.
- 12/05/2011 05:47:03 AM
712 Views
That's just fine as far as I'm concerned
- 12/05/2011 02:23:44 PM
711 Views
Yes, I suppose a church could go that route.
- 14/05/2011 07:38:02 AM
680 Views
I'm not attempting to impose a dichotomy on the Bible.
- 14/05/2011 03:25:30 PM
738 Views
I don't even know what following the Bible in its entirety means.
- 14/05/2011 09:09:10 PM
913 Views
As an exercise, I tried to think of how I would justify allowing homosexuals as clergy.
- 14/05/2011 04:19:43 PM
718 Views
Thanks (I'm actually OK with women priests though).
- 12/05/2011 07:09:11 AM
791 Views
There's ample precedent for female religious leaders, even within the bible.
- 12/05/2011 06:51:05 AM
821 Views
Since when is Moses' society the be-all end all?
- 12/05/2011 07:12:41 PM
701 Views
Since never, which is why I referenced five other eras you completely ignored.
- 14/05/2011 01:11:30 AM
803 Views
They did so, via negativa.
- 12/05/2011 04:22:17 PM
861 Views
Sorry for the delay, particularly since it looks like I'll be spending a fair amount of time here.
- 14/05/2011 12:31:33 AM
659 Views
Your church has a constitution?!
- 12/05/2011 03:36:41 AM
722 Views
My Church has a congress! 
*NM*
- 12/05/2011 03:37:52 AM
365 Views
*NM*
- 12/05/2011 03:37:52 AM
365 Views
Haha no way! *NM*
- 12/05/2011 03:46:32 AM
318 Views
Well, we have one group of laity and one of bishops, so it is only mildy utter chaos. 
*NM*
- 12/05/2011 05:51:09 AM
343 Views
*NM*
- 12/05/2011 05:51:09 AM
343 Views
I'm happy to hear this, personally. I also wonder how you reconcile this with the Bible.
- 12/05/2011 04:11:31 AM
907 Views
Every direct reference to homosexuality in the Bible is a reference to rape.
- 12/05/2011 04:12:43 PM
738 Views
Every single word that you wrote in your response is complete bullshit.
- 12/05/2011 05:50:07 PM
849 Views
Knock off your eisegesis, try some exegesis
- 12/05/2011 07:02:45 PM
789 Views
I'm trying to figure out just what your "gifts" are, because I don't see any.
- 12/05/2011 07:30:39 PM
761 Views
There are cases in which hypocrisy is far better than the alternatives.
- 12/05/2011 10:04:32 PM
834 Views
Hypocrisy is better than, say, setting gays on fire, yes.
- 12/05/2011 10:10:40 PM
794 Views
My statement is that, from a pragmatic point of view, hypocrisy shouldn't be discouraged too much.
- 13/05/2011 10:05:39 PM
800 Views
Oh, is that how we're playing this, then?
- 13/05/2011 06:29:31 PM
756 Views
I'm not playing. I'm pointing out some glaring errors on your part.
- 13/05/2011 07:25:08 PM
678 Views
The Bible says what it says. The problem... people like to tell us just what else it's saying.
- 13/05/2011 05:31:29 PM
700 Views
You don't reconcile... you pick the parts you like and adjust the rest to suit you.
- 13/05/2011 09:33:54 PM
660 Views
Another example...
- 12/05/2011 09:19:52 AM
654 Views
If you claim to follow the entire Bible, then you are completely correct.
- 12/05/2011 06:04:38 PM
631 Views
On the contrary, this move will take some butts out of the seats.
- 12/05/2011 07:16:22 PM
691 Views
We both know that isn't the case
- 12/05/2011 07:55:41 PM
798 Views
Cool cool. I have a question on a semi-related note, about Protestant Gospels
- 12/05/2011 05:33:49 PM
760 Views
No Protestant denomination has added so much as a word to the Bible
- 12/05/2011 05:58:16 PM
637 Views
So, everyone hates Judith, then?
- 12/05/2011 06:40:11 PM
699 Views
The Catholics and Eastern Orthodox Churches accept Judith as part of Scripture.
- 12/05/2011 07:51:27 PM
675 Views
Does the Eastern Orthodox Church also segregate deuterocanonical works like Roman Catholicism does?
- 14/05/2011 02:19:03 AM
981 Views
The Eastern Church bases everything on the Septuagint.
- 14/05/2011 02:34:41 AM
725 Views
That sounds appealing, and makes sense.
- 14/05/2011 02:44:56 AM
747 Views
Oh, I just enjoy calling Protestants "heretics" to remind them not everyone agrees with them.
- 14/05/2011 03:25:42 AM
685 Views
Re: Cool cool. I have a question on a semi-related note, about Protestant Gospels
- 12/05/2011 08:52:48 PM
708 Views
The NIV is terrible. The NASB has the best translation I have found (of the NT, at least).
- 12/05/2011 10:43:58 PM
846 Views
I find this really weird, to be honest
- 13/05/2011 05:48:28 AM
717 Views
Well, it wasn't just Athanasius. But yes, we are lucky in that respect. *NM*
- 13/05/2011 06:32:48 AM
301 Views
Athanasius's list reflected the victory of Pauline Christianity
- 13/05/2011 02:52:53 PM
675 Views
There's a school of thought that says that's a strong vindication of Athanasius. 
- 14/05/2011 02:37:49 AM
616 Views
- 14/05/2011 02:37:49 AM
616 Views