Active Users:1207 Time:22/11/2024 06:39:26 PM
Thanks (I'm actually OK with women priests though). Joel Send a noteboard - 12/05/2011 07:09:11 AM
You're excoriating Joel for asking a very valid question. There is a clear and explicit disconnect between the way you are practicing Christianity and the way that it has been understood for some two odd millennia. If you're willing to say that you're Gnostics, Arians or Cathars, or that you're a new branch of Christianity based on a different revelation then I can accept that as your choice. However, you claim to be Pauline Christians following the text of the Bible. There is explicit language against all of these acts in the Bible. I haven't seen a satisfactory explanation from the Presbyterian Church (which has admittedly never been strong on theology) as to how these ideas are reconciled.

If you want to pillory Joel and be thankful he's not a Presbyterian, that's fine. Everyone around here has pilloried him at one time or another. However, don't think for an instant that this somehow means that the points he's raising aren't valid, or that you don't have to address them just because it makes you uncomfortable.

I suspect Ghav knows that and was trying to catch me in a double standard, but I don't feel bound to every one of Pauls shopping lists found and made canon, because in a few instances he says point blank he's giving his opinion rather than the Holy Spirits divine judgement. What status, if any, Chloe and Phoebe had in the early Christian hierachy may be debateable, but it's undeniable that the bible represents Deborah as a Judge, which was pretty much the top of the Churchs mortal hierarchy at the time. That trumps Paul in my book (so to speak). I can't think of any such examples regarding homosexuals though. Arguments that any biblical or Church Fathers writings or subsequent Church history and tradition condone the practice are very new, and I know of none that don't either discount the MANY prohibitions or make biblical friends of the same sex into lovers. I'm willing to say it MIGHT be open to interpretation because I'm not God and still don't consider the scribes infallible, but if practicing homosexuality is permissible it's a pretty glaring oversight given all the HOSTILE language on the subject. Again, I'm not saying anyone should be kicked out of the Church over it, but if the issue of whether it offends God is that uncertain condoning it in Church leaders is unwise.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Presbyterian Church (USA) passes Amendment 10-A. - 11/05/2011 05:39:29 PM 1335 Views
*NM* - 11/05/2011 06:10:26 PM 284 Views
I am happy to see this. *NM* - 11/05/2011 07:22:59 PM 317 Views
Homosexuals must die! - 11/05/2011 08:25:25 PM 999 Views
I agree! This sort of behavior can NOT be excused!!! - 11/05/2011 10:38:16 PM 654 Views
Yay!!. - 11/05/2011 10:38:51 PM 828 Views
Glad to hear it. *NM* - 11/05/2011 10:46:39 PM 381 Views
Well done. *NM* - 11/05/2011 11:07:22 PM 323 Views
What's the language? Did they at least TRY to give a doctrinal justification? - 12/05/2011 02:10:46 AM 835 Views
Thank you for that rousing argument against married priests. - 12/05/2011 03:36:51 AM 823 Views
Why ARE you letting women into the priesthood? - 12/05/2011 04:16:50 AM 771 Views
Because Episcopalians don't listen to the Bible much. - 12/05/2011 05:47:03 AM 713 Views
That's just fine as far as I'm concerned - 12/05/2011 02:23:44 PM 711 Views
Yes, I suppose a church could go that route. - 14/05/2011 07:38:02 AM 681 Views
I'm not attempting to impose a dichotomy on the Bible. - 14/05/2011 03:25:30 PM 739 Views
I don't even know what following the Bible in its entirety means. - 14/05/2011 09:09:10 PM 914 Views
As an exercise, I tried to think of how I would justify allowing homosexuals as clergy. - 14/05/2011 04:19:43 PM 718 Views
Wow. - 20/05/2011 10:15:21 AM 746 Views
Thanks (I'm actually OK with women priests though). - 12/05/2011 07:09:11 AM 792 Views
It's more a question of interpretational standards. - 12/05/2011 02:29:43 PM 683 Views
Agreed. - 14/05/2011 01:17:45 AM 768 Views
They did so, via negativa. - 12/05/2011 04:22:17 PM 862 Views
Your church has a constitution?! - 12/05/2011 03:36:41 AM 723 Views
My Church has a congress! *NM* - 12/05/2011 03:37:52 AM 365 Views
Haha no way! *NM* - 12/05/2011 03:46:32 AM 319 Views
We have a General Assembly and a Moderator. - 12/05/2011 04:18:34 PM 815 Views
I had no idea the US was based on that system. - 12/05/2011 06:22:58 PM 644 Views
It is pretty common practice - 12/05/2011 06:54:02 PM 684 Views
Oh I'm sure it is with newer churches. - 12/05/2011 10:49:11 PM 742 Views
I'm happy to hear this, personally. I also wonder how you reconcile this with the Bible. - 12/05/2011 04:11:31 AM 907 Views
Every direct reference to homosexuality in the Bible is a reference to rape. - 12/05/2011 04:12:43 PM 738 Views
Every single word that you wrote in your response is complete bullshit. - 12/05/2011 05:50:07 PM 850 Views
Knock off your eisegesis, try some exegesis - 12/05/2011 07:02:45 PM 790 Views
I'm trying to figure out just what your "gifts" are, because I don't see any. - 12/05/2011 07:30:39 PM 761 Views
Oh, is that how we're playing this, then? - 13/05/2011 06:29:31 PM 757 Views
Re: Oh, is that how we're playing this, then? - 13/05/2011 07:02:35 PM 737 Views
I'm not playing. I'm pointing out some glaring errors on your part. - 13/05/2011 07:25:08 PM 678 Views
Danny will correct me if I'm wrong, but... - 13/05/2011 09:55:14 PM 866 Views
Danny persistently refuses to say that - 13/05/2011 10:13:55 PM 792 Views
You're a fucking moron. *NM* - 15/05/2011 11:11:08 PM 350 Views
You make a very important but too often overlooked point. - 14/05/2011 01:54:40 AM 819 Views
??? the bible was harsher on homosexulaity than on rape - 12/05/2011 06:56:43 PM 713 Views
Read Judges. - 12/05/2011 07:17:29 PM 715 Views
Another example... - 12/05/2011 09:19:52 AM 655 Views
That's what people said about churches opposing slavery. - 12/05/2011 04:06:26 PM 712 Views
I rest my case *NM* - 12/05/2011 04:48:32 PM 313 Views
That is a false dichotomy and we both know it. - 14/05/2011 02:07:19 AM 712 Views
If you claim to follow the entire Bible, then you are completely correct. - 12/05/2011 06:04:38 PM 631 Views
On the contrary, this move will take some butts out of the seats. - 12/05/2011 07:16:22 PM 692 Views
We both know that isn't the case - 12/05/2011 07:55:41 PM 799 Views
Whatever your issue is, get over it. - 13/05/2011 06:17:26 PM 675 Views
You'd be a lot more effective... - 13/05/2011 06:45:31 PM 774 Views
You haven't adequately expressed your theology - 13/05/2011 07:28:54 PM 771 Views
Cool cool. I have a question on a semi-related note, about Protestant Gospels - 12/05/2011 05:33:49 PM 761 Views
Since I haven't gotten around to asking yet... - 13/05/2011 07:14:01 PM 665 Views
Re: Since I haven't gotten around to asking yet... - 15/05/2011 03:18:23 PM 1079 Views

Reply to Message