so the rest of should be forced to send our kids to bad schools to keep a level playing field? *NM*
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 06/05/2011 05:24:23 PM
People don't need to be forced to feed themselves and their children, whether they care enough to be bothered about it or not. That's because if you don't eat, you die. Unless the parents are unbelievably callous (which does happen, but only very occasionally), they will do whatever it takes to keep their children fed. So the problem of parents simply not caring enough almost never arises.
By contrast, if you don't send your kids to school, they don't die – they just grow up to be useless people who do nothing but hang around causing trouble for everyone else. Then they can't get a job, so it's either benefits or crime, and the economy goes (even further) down the toilet. Unlike with food, vast numbers of parents wouldn't care enough about education to make their children go to school, or to pay for it in the first place.
Don't you think preventing all that unemployment and crime is worth spending public money on?
If Supermarkets Were Like Public Schools -
06/05/2011 05:05:33 AM
- 972 Views
the obvious solution is to just do away with public education in general
06/05/2011 06:41:58 AM
- 415 Views
If groceries were like education... the analogy would be apt. But they aren't, and it isn't.
06/05/2011 09:40:37 AM
- 585 Views
06/05/2011 01:41:10 PM
- 405 Views
I don't see your point there. The eating of groceries also goes on for many years – all one's life. *NM*
06/05/2011 01:42:38 PM
- 172 Views
Yes, but the effects of not having any are seen within days
06/05/2011 05:29:16 PM
- 394 Views
I see. Yes, that's another reason why it's easy to sit back and do nothing until it's too late.
06/05/2011 06:40:03 PM
- 382 Views
Very narrow-minded - the point is, private is better than public.....
06/05/2011 02:47:39 PM
- 399 Views
so the rest of should be forced to send our kids to bad schools to keep a level playing field? *NM*
06/05/2011 05:24:23 PM
- 166 Views
I have said nothing of the sort, and never would.
06/05/2011 06:31:48 PM
- 412 Views
That is exactly what you said.....and my other reply to you proves.....
06/05/2011 10:05:40 PM
- 410 Views
Fair enough on the second point (almost) – correction duly edited in.
06/05/2011 10:16:39 PM
- 416 Views
That's a rather big non-sequitur there, don't you think?
06/05/2011 06:36:51 PM
- 424 Views
If the state doesn't pay for schools, what happens to children whose parents have no money?
06/05/2011 10:25:48 PM
- 408 Views
More relevantly, what would schools be like if they were run like supermarkets? *NM*
06/05/2011 02:27:49 PM
- 164 Views
Bad schools would close, good ones would get more students - sounds fine to me! *NM*
06/05/2011 02:49:30 PM
- 158 Views
spoken like someone who has no idea what it takes to run a "good school" *NM*
06/05/2011 04:17:12 PM
- 165 Views
Then you have half as many schools. So not much scope for choice any more.
06/05/2011 06:44:26 PM
- 391 Views
most of your arguements are against public education being financed by property taxes *NM*
06/05/2011 02:33:41 PM
- 206 Views
And the forced attendence by where you live instead of giving parents a choice. *NM*
06/05/2011 02:50:23 PM
- 180 Views
Look, I just want a store that carries Crunch n Munch with Almonds.
06/05/2011 09:05:23 PM
- 414 Views
Well if the socialists have their way you won't get Crunch n Munch at all
06/05/2011 11:05:55 PM
- 381 Views