It's frankly typical for Obama and his administration's entire line of "we know better than you do what information to give you". We saw this in the health care debate, where they said, "You just don't understand the bill" and now we see it here, where the statement is "it's too grisly for you". I am not a fan of governments keeping secrets for no reason. I can understand keeping the identity of the SEAL team secret, to protect them and their families. But a photo of a dead bin Laden with a big gaping hole in his head? There's no reason NOT to disclose it, and so it should be disclosed.
The secret would be if we were not told that he was dead, in order not to piss off his followers. Something we all know isn't a secret, so the photo doesn't change that. Unless you believe you have reason to doubt?
According to what I've heard (admittedly many different sources), the official release isn't about it being too grisly or that we're too delicate for it. It's about keeping the photo out of the hands of people who would use it for propaganda against us. So, no reason not to disclose it? Not true. If you're not looking at it that the govt is trying to protect you from it, I need a better reason than just: "It exists, let me see it."
His head on a spike?
04/05/2011 06:51:25 PM
- 1571 Views
They'll probably leak out and be all over the internet regardless of what he does
04/05/2011 07:56:22 PM
- 1006 Views
No.
04/05/2011 08:31:47 PM
- 990 Views
Damn I posted as excalibur again
04/05/2011 08:32:43 PM
- 819 Views
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67d2e/67d2e2a473bdcb4d87c92cc24e265637dd3ccee5" alt=""
But how do we know you're not excalibur pretending to be Avienda?
04/05/2011 08:40:17 PM
- 980 Views
Or me, pretending to be you?
04/05/2011 09:56:06 PM
- 908 Views
Sorry, I'm such a jerkface for doing that
*NM*
04/05/2011 10:06:15 PM
- 823 Views
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe010/fe0103e588b33eb762b38ac746f51e907ed2f969" alt=""
I vote yes. We should have release the pictures.
04/05/2011 09:38:37 PM
- 1024 Views
Is it about us?
04/05/2011 09:48:41 PM
- 951 Views
If the photo exists, it should be released. Period.
04/05/2011 10:31:09 PM
- 1084 Views
I'm not sure that tells me why.
04/05/2011 10:41:15 PM
- 966 Views
I don't believe in censorship of anything that doesn't need to be censored. Period. *NM*
05/05/2011 03:50:28 PM
- 526 Views
That isn't the statement I saw from Obama,
04/05/2011 10:55:57 PM
- 913 Views
He always gives a bullshit reason for what he does. *NM*
05/05/2011 03:17:28 AM
- 450 Views
So, you think "you're too delicate" is a less-bullshit reason?
05/05/2011 03:22:16 AM
- 1046 Views
No. It's even more bullshit. There is no good reason to keep the photos confidential. *NM*
05/05/2011 03:51:08 PM
- 487 Views
Heh. Ok. So says you, so it must be. *NM*
05/05/2011 05:12:33 PM
- 524 Views
Is it that you think there is no risk of increased attacks against Western soldiers/ innocent
05/05/2011 09:54:42 AM
- 926 Views
Due to showing the picture? No. Due to killing bin Laden? Yes. *NM*
05/05/2011 02:20:55 PM
- 490 Views
That is exactly how I feel. I have found it disturbing how many people want to see those pictures.
05/05/2011 04:05:22 AM
- 1021 Views
If it exists, you should be able to consume it?
05/05/2011 05:59:51 PM
- 1016 Views
It is a government document and we know of its existence, so YES, as a citizen I have a right to it.
05/05/2011 06:21:00 PM
- 886 Views
I think that is the answer that people were looking for from you. I may not like it still, but it
10/05/2011 03:44:14 AM
- 913 Views
I don't think releasing it is a very big deal, but I support his decision
04/05/2011 11:21:04 PM
- 910 Views
For a complete sense of closure, to say it's done and move on without looking back, I say yea.
05/05/2011 05:33:31 AM
- 960 Views