Stop being a fool - read and react to the data provided, posting something.....
trzaska2000 Send a noteboard - 16/04/2011 10:14:11 PM
.....different is not a response.
Go back to my post, look at the CBO data, and in your words, tell me what you think.
Hint: saying that you were wrong and that spending is the real problem is the correct reply.
Last try.....
Go back to my post, look at the CBO data, and in your words, tell me what you think.
Hint: saying that you were wrong and that spending is the real problem is the correct reply.
Last try.....
*MySmiley*
Several basics facts about US Debt and Spending.....
16/04/2011 04:41:55 AM
- 1207 Views

Guess we should have okay'd those death panels for old people then. Big money saver.
*NM*
16/04/2011 03:38:00 PM
- 367 Views

Balancing our budget would be easy.
16/04/2011 06:46:32 PM
- 674 Views
Several of those aren't as easy as you make it sound, but the import tax is a big no-no.
16/04/2011 07:34:30 PM
- 894 Views
Also on the buying drugs from Canada idea
16/04/2011 08:17:26 PM
- 779 Views
Funny you mentioned WWII and 1968. Can you put tax rates at these times as well?
16/04/2011 07:50:09 PM
- 1157 Views
Not really. Even if you can substantially raise tax revenue, the entitlement problem remains. *NM*
16/04/2011 08:25:26 PM
- 328 Views
Re: Not really. Even if you can substantially raise tax revenue, the entitlement problem remains.
16/04/2011 09:19:40 PM
- 822 Views
Have you ever looked at those projections for a decade or two hence?
16/04/2011 10:13:12 PM
- 771 Views
Yes I have
16/04/2011 10:44:50 PM
- 892 Views
Erm, and you think total health care spending is not getting out of control? I'm a little confused.
16/04/2011 11:02:52 PM
- 822 Views
Exactly. Cutting back on fraud and waste doesn't really put much of a dent in those projections. *NM*
17/04/2011 02:31:13 AM
- 305 Views
Sorry, but that is a stupid opinion.....
16/04/2011 08:38:35 PM
- 708 Views
Sounds like another bull.
16/04/2011 09:31:05 PM
- 997 Views
Dude, the data is the data.....tax revenue increased all three times.
16/04/2011 09:47:37 PM
- 941 Views
As I suspected, it's a bull.
16/04/2011 10:02:05 PM
- 867 Views
Stop being a fool - read and react to the data provided, posting something.....
16/04/2011 10:14:11 PM
- 633 Views
Response is
16/04/2011 10:19:00 PM
- 853 Views
Good lord.....it's like talking to a brick. I really hope you are 12 or 13.
16/04/2011 10:28:44 PM
- 842 Views
Re: Good lord.....it's like talking to a brick. I really hope you are 12 or 13.
16/04/2011 10:47:24 PM
- 810 Views
I take it you mean "rate of revenue growth decreases".
16/04/2011 11:11:19 PM
- 701 Views
It's not remarkable that revenue increased after the Reagan cuts.
17/04/2011 07:21:47 PM
- 1034 Views
I've just noticed that you've provided charts from Heritage Foundation! Are you f.. kidding me?
16/04/2011 10:13:46 PM
- 724 Views
All the data is via CBO - do you know that the CBO is?
16/04/2011 10:16:08 PM
- 737 Views
Re: All the data is via CBO - do you know that the CBO is?
16/04/2011 10:27:01 PM
- 853 Views
Nice try.....care to explain why the same exact thing happened.....
16/04/2011 10:35:44 PM
- 668 Views
Re: Nice try.....care to explain why the same exact thing happened.....
16/04/2011 10:49:33 PM
- 800 Views
Krugman is a shill for the Obama administration.
17/04/2011 02:34:50 AM
- 675 Views
Re: Krugman is a shill for the Obama administration.
17/04/2011 03:50:24 AM
- 906 Views
Some obesrvations by Republican economists
18/04/2011 12:27:04 AM
- 1043 Views
You mean the Keynesian economist who wrote The Failure of Reaganomics
18/04/2011 04:00:52 PM
- 677 Views
Re: You mean the Keynesian economist who wrote The Failure of Reaganomics
18/04/2011 05:36:44 PM
- 668 Views
You use Krugman and then complain about the Heritage Foundation! Are you f.. kidding me? *NM*
18/04/2011 02:46:47 AM
- 344 Views