Have you ever looked at those projections for a decade or two hence?
Legolas Send a noteboard - 16/04/2011 10:13:12 PM
I dont understand how it remains a problem if you have enough revenue to cover it. So called "entitlement problem" is the problem only if you don't have money to pay for it. Otherwise, it's not a problem.
Even if you suppose you can raise tax revenue by cutting loopholes and forcing large companies to pay more taxes - whether that'll work or have the desired effect is another question, and one I don't feel particularly qualified to answer - it would only give you a little bit of respite. Social Security and Medicare are set on a growth path that will rapidly make them take up such huge parts of the budget that adjustments in other parts of the budget will make little difference. One way or another, the growth of those two programs has to be radically slowed down - or else the government will rapidly find itself unable to fund other important services. And frankly, I'm not sure merely cutting back waste and fraud will be enough.
Several basics facts about US Debt and Spending.....
16/04/2011 04:41:55 AM
- 1143 Views
Guess we should have okay'd those death panels for old people then. Big money saver. *NM*
16/04/2011 03:38:00 PM
- 340 Views
Balancing our budget would be easy.
16/04/2011 06:46:32 PM
- 598 Views
Several of those aren't as easy as you make it sound, but the import tax is a big no-no.
16/04/2011 07:34:30 PM
- 830 Views
Also on the buying drugs from Canada idea
16/04/2011 08:17:26 PM
- 714 Views
Funny you mentioned WWII and 1968. Can you put tax rates at these times as well?
16/04/2011 07:50:09 PM
- 1087 Views
Not really. Even if you can substantially raise tax revenue, the entitlement problem remains. *NM*
16/04/2011 08:25:26 PM
- 297 Views
Re: Not really. Even if you can substantially raise tax revenue, the entitlement problem remains.
16/04/2011 09:19:40 PM
- 758 Views
Have you ever looked at those projections for a decade or two hence?
16/04/2011 10:13:12 PM
- 697 Views
Yes I have
16/04/2011 10:44:50 PM
- 828 Views
Erm, and you think total health care spending is not getting out of control? I'm a little confused.
16/04/2011 11:02:52 PM
- 756 Views
Exactly. Cutting back on fraud and waste doesn't really put much of a dent in those projections. *NM*
17/04/2011 02:31:13 AM
- 279 Views
Sorry, but that is a stupid opinion.....
16/04/2011 08:38:35 PM
- 663 Views
Sounds like another bull.
16/04/2011 09:31:05 PM
- 931 Views
Dude, the data is the data.....tax revenue increased all three times.
16/04/2011 09:47:37 PM
- 874 Views
As I suspected, it's a bull.
16/04/2011 10:02:05 PM
- 801 Views
Stop being a fool - read and react to the data provided, posting something.....
16/04/2011 10:14:11 PM
- 569 Views
Response is
16/04/2011 10:19:00 PM
- 787 Views
Good lord.....it's like talking to a brick. I really hope you are 12 or 13.
16/04/2011 10:28:44 PM
- 784 Views
Re: Good lord.....it's like talking to a brick. I really hope you are 12 or 13.
16/04/2011 10:47:24 PM
- 745 Views
I take it you mean "rate of revenue growth decreases".
16/04/2011 11:11:19 PM
- 639 Views
It's not remarkable that revenue increased after the Reagan cuts.
17/04/2011 07:21:47 PM
- 967 Views
I've just noticed that you've provided charts from Heritage Foundation! Are you f.. kidding me?
16/04/2011 10:13:46 PM
- 662 Views
All the data is via CBO - do you know that the CBO is?
16/04/2011 10:16:08 PM
- 673 Views
Re: All the data is via CBO - do you know that the CBO is?
16/04/2011 10:27:01 PM
- 789 Views
Nice try.....care to explain why the same exact thing happened.....
16/04/2011 10:35:44 PM
- 604 Views
Re: Nice try.....care to explain why the same exact thing happened.....
16/04/2011 10:49:33 PM
- 735 Views
Krugman is a shill for the Obama administration.
17/04/2011 02:34:50 AM
- 614 Views
Re: Krugman is a shill for the Obama administration.
17/04/2011 03:50:24 AM
- 838 Views
Some obesrvations by Republican economists
18/04/2011 12:27:04 AM
- 975 Views
You mean the Keynesian economist who wrote The Failure of Reaganomics
18/04/2011 04:00:52 PM
- 610 Views
Re: You mean the Keynesian economist who wrote The Failure of Reaganomics
18/04/2011 05:36:44 PM
- 595 Views
You use Krugman and then complain about the Heritage Foundation! Are you f.. kidding me? *NM*
18/04/2011 02:46:47 AM
- 312 Views