Our Equality Act says "Race includes— (a) colour; (b) nationality; (c) ethnic or national origins".
The people in question might not even fit that definition, you realize, if they're immigrants. So you can't even use that as support for your claim, really.
Race and nationality are quite different. Otherwise, you're going to have to say inane things like "racist against Americans."
P.S. I'm not massively impressed to learn that you find anti-British racism "hilarious", even if it's not as common or pervasive as other forms of racism. How is racism against one group any less bad than racism against another?
It reminds me of rich people complaining about their taxes, is all. If there actually were instances of people being hurt because of their being British (perhaps in the case of New Zealand, as Rebekah pointed out), I'd be willing to reconsider. But otherwise, no, it's a pretty risible concept.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
I have never EVER met kids this horrible
15/04/2011 05:14:06 AM
- 1559 Views
slapping might make him sillier? Sounds like the parents would enjoy that too? *NM*
15/04/2011 05:25:38 AM
- 331 Views
Welcome to children in a world run by liberals. *NM*
15/04/2011 05:51:46 AM
- 270 Views
I am gonna beat my childrens asses raw if they ever act like that *NM*
15/04/2011 06:25:54 AM
- 249 Views
That sounds extremely annoying. But less of the racism, if you don't mind.
15/04/2011 10:11:09 AM
- 562 Views
they are paki british if it helps *NM*
15/04/2011 04:11:39 PM
- 272 Views
... *NM*
15/04/2011 04:21:24 PM
- 258 Views
Re: Pretty much my reaction.
15/04/2011 07:26:22 PM
- 590 Views
"Paki" is used self-referentially in the States without being a slur. Cool your jets.
15/04/2011 08:07:26 PM
- 793 Views
Wait, what?
15/04/2011 08:12:34 PM
- 652 Views
SILVER ON THE TREE. Bullies are tormenting a Sikh child on a bridge.
15/04/2011 08:40:46 PM
- 507 Views
Re: Why would you think that you know it's a slur in the UK, but I wouldn't?
15/04/2011 08:47:50 PM
- 521 Views
I was talking about Aisha, not you. I don't know where you live--I thought you were European.
15/04/2011 09:51:10 PM
- 559 Views
Re: Just to point out:
16/04/2011 01:28:01 AM
- 527 Views
Am I the only one who sees a difference in this?
16/04/2011 01:49:49 AM
- 669 Views
Obviously killing people is worse than calling them names.
16/04/2011 08:29:22 AM
- 524 Views
I think that makes various forms of discrimination less serious.
17/04/2011 01:28:37 AM
- 505 Views
39 views? It's been like four minutes! STOP USING INTERNET EXPLORER, PEOPLE. *NM*
17/04/2011 01:40:45 AM
- 215 Views
Much less than you'd think, given that is considered racist over here in the UK unlike the US. *NM*
15/04/2011 04:26:54 PM
- 210 Views
Even aside from the use of the word "Paki"...
15/04/2011 07:36:41 PM
- 490 Views
Well, they aren't racially British, so "anti-British racism" is by definition inapplicable here.
15/04/2011 08:04:36 PM
- 555 Views
Methinks you have a rather narrow definition of "race".
15/04/2011 11:14:51 PM
- 762 Views
I disagree.
15/04/2011 11:34:44 PM
- 566 Views
No, you just distorted the word "race" out of all recognition for legal definition purposes.
16/04/2011 12:39:26 AM
- 495 Views
Does the existence of a British race even exist by that definition? *NM*
16/04/2011 01:44:38 AM
- 219 Views
By giving... its legal definition in the UK! (At least for the purposes of the Equality Act.)
16/04/2011 08:51:58 AM
- 650 Views
Yes, my point was that giving legal definitions was a corruption of common sense.
16/04/2011 08:26:48 PM
- 468 Views
It doesn't sound very natural to me to say "OMG you're being nationalityist!" *NM*
17/04/2011 12:13:41 AM
- 384 Views
Re: You do know you're getting no cookies for this line of discussion. *NM*
17/04/2011 01:31:24 AM
- 331 Views