They also were never against it. They wouldn't vote for cause they never do, they wouldn't vote against as then when the massacre happens they carry the burden of no-UN invovlement, so they instead do the usual, abstain and then go "Oh noes, this is horrible, please stop". It's duplicitous at best.

As for Amr Moussa, the old convenient misquote uh? By the time anythings said about it it's already too late as the news has flown round the world, and reports are coming in of the "cracks in the coalition". And what part of a misquote requires an emergency meeting?