Active Users:341 Time:10/04/2025 11:48:02 PM
no it shows that the one statements was not meant to be taken literally random thoughts Send a noteboard - 17/03/2011 02:47:55 AM
Both statements were given within moments of each other so you can not judge the second statement without keeping in mind what he had said in the first. You don't have to like what he said but the fact remains that the quote posted was misleading and taken out of context. I am not defending Rush and I don't particularly like the man and you will never find me using him as a source. He was making jokes about Chelsy Clinton when she was still a teenager living in the White House and that crosses any reasonable line of decency. It doesn't change the fact that his quote was taken out of context. It was clear to anyone willing to be honest with themselves that it was meant as hyperbole and not as a real claim that they were actaully doing it. He was claiming it was the kind of thing they would do. And lets be honest almost any national disaster from flooding to rain to drought to hurricanes to snow storms to heat waves has been blamed on global warming in the last few years. He was poking fun at that.

By the way I am still not convinced the other guy was not implying that Mother Nature was literally sending us a signal but I do accept that I don't have enough context to make that judgment and I am not going assume that is what he meant simply because it fits my view of reactionary environmentalist.
Reply to message
So, how many drugs is Rush Limbaugh actually on? - 16/03/2011 08:30:25 AM 897 Views
Possibly different ones then the EESC president - 16/03/2011 03:58:41 PM 804 Views
No one's blaming the earthquake or tsunami on global warming. - 16/03/2011 04:22:52 PM 610 Views
Actually people have - 16/03/2011 04:31:37 PM 761 Views
Which people? Where? Example? - 16/03/2011 06:48:10 PM 779 Views
Tsunami and climate change - 17/03/2011 11:59:36 PM 751 Views
A slightly misleading post - 16/03/2011 07:41:46 PM 696 Views
Surprised? *NM* - 16/03/2011 08:59:35 PM 296 Views
Not completely. *NM* - 16/03/2011 09:13:48 PM 257 Views
Kind of missed the point there - 16/03/2011 09:54:35 PM 690 Views
If you link the transcript I'll look at it. - 16/03/2011 10:16:21 PM 577 Views
Re: If you link the transcript I'll look at it. - 16/03/2011 10:44:56 PM 701 Views
" I can't help attaching, you know, political reaction to this". Yeah, we noticed.... - 16/03/2011 11:10:11 PM 719 Views
Re: " I can't help attaching, you know, political reaction to this". Yeah, we noticed.... - 16/03/2011 11:42:29 PM 547 Views
Fair enough. - 17/03/2011 12:08:13 AM 652 Views
Re: Fair enough. - 17/03/2011 12:37:12 AM 631 Views
No worries. - 17/03/2011 12:48:44 AM 891 Views
I've read the transcript - 16/03/2011 10:34:41 PM 721 Views
Re: I've read the transcript - 16/03/2011 10:46:42 PM 627 Views
You need to reread what I said - 16/03/2011 10:49:45 PM 595 Views
No, I think you're still missing my point - 16/03/2011 11:09:04 PM 669 Views
Perhaps - 16/03/2011 11:26:37 PM 729 Views
Okay, I'm done - 16/03/2011 11:37:58 PM 624 Views
Seriously, you need to pick a better example to make your point - 18/03/2011 05:00:10 PM 610 Views
No. You don't get to say, "what he said doesn't matter because of how we learned of it". - 16/03/2011 11:54:46 PM 626 Views
I told you, I'm done in this thread - 16/03/2011 11:59:08 PM 593 Views
Acknowledged (though I'd not seen that response yet, sorry). - 17/03/2011 12:11:58 AM 639 Views
I think Republicans should stop using "legitimate". I do not think it means what they think it means - 16/03/2011 04:11:14 PM 718 Views
there are enough carzies on the left to make things like this easy for Rush - 16/03/2011 04:20:47 PM 669 Views
So it doesn't matter that no one said it as long as he can plausibly claim they did. - 16/03/2011 06:58:17 PM 591 Views
well since it is taken out of context it is hard to say where Rush was going with it - 16/03/2011 07:19:46 PM 687 Views
Um... he stated where he was going with it. - 16/03/2011 07:30:02 PM 658 Views
At least you are not ashamed to use a double standard - 16/03/2011 08:17:39 PM 602 Views
It's the same standard, whatever you choose to believe. - 16/03/2011 09:08:01 PM 725 Views
I don't thinkit is as clear as you make it out to be - 16/03/2011 09:31:53 PM 615 Views
It is not just "possible" he's talking about islands affected by global warming; he says it outright - 16/03/2011 10:09:16 PM 775 Views
Sorry but I still fail to see how the islands he mention are a sign of what needs to be done - 16/03/2011 10:27:20 PM 655 Views
Hey, guys! - 16/03/2011 10:55:07 PM 551 Views
and how its that different than what I said? *NM* - 16/03/2011 11:14:46 PM 250 Views
Then you don't understand context and this whole discussion is pointless. - 16/03/2011 11:28:47 PM 734 Views
lets throw a little context at asnd see if it matters - 17/03/2011 12:12:03 AM 619 Views
Yes: It makes it worse. - 17/03/2011 12:45:12 AM 627 Views
no it shows that the one statements was not meant to be taken literally - 17/03/2011 02:47:55 AM 652 Views
Re: At least you are not ashamed to use a double standard - 16/03/2011 09:22:37 PM 744 Views
maybe he heard that they were blaming it on Pearl Harbor *NM* - 16/03/2011 10:14:59 PM 239 Views

Reply to Message