It's the same standard, whatever you choose to believe. - Edit 2
Before modification by Joel at 16/03/2011 09:20:14 PM
We have more context for the global warming guy than Rush. Now to be fair Rush is very likely putting the very worst spin he can come up with on this guys words. You two are kind of reverse polarity Twinkies in that regard. But I would like to know what "signs" the guy is talking about and the way he worded it does seem to imply that Mother Nature (notice the caps) was somehow involved.
He stated the signs he was talking about so you don't have to guess. Maybe I'm being too verbose and hard to follow again; snoop makes exactly the same point in response to Isaac, but as usual does it far more concisely. The other PARAGRAPHS in the mans statement clarify the single SENTENCE that would otherwise be so ambiguous as to be meaningless. Limbaughs comments are unambiguous; do you have or just really want to believe in a statement by him that changes that? Note that I'm not begging the question, because I'm referring to something we all know he said clearly.
Of course we could have just waited to have this whole discussion until someone blamed gays. I am really shocked that it hasn't happened yet.
Give Pat Robertson time.
Just don't complain around the Tea Party if he blames gays, or you might be shocked to learn you're a Muslim/terrorist. 