Active Users:369 Time:18/04/2025 08:33:08 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
About time you came back, Shannon! Tashmere Send a noteboard - 03/03/2011 11:42:39 PM
Ideally what I would like to see happen is for the media to report that those people are coming to picket a funeral and let the community know just enough to organize a barrier to keep them away from the grieving family. And then I would love to see the media pretend they weren't there. I want them to come all that way to be blocked out from the funeral and a total shunning by the media. Not one word about it. I wonder how long they would keep shelling out money if everything they were working for was thwarted?
Reply to message
US Supreme Court allows anti-gay funeral protests everynametaken - 03/03/2011 04:55:52 AM 905 Views
Honestly... good. *NM* beetnemesis - 03/03/2011 04:59:21 AM 230 Views
Yeah ... Darth_Katie - 03/03/2011 03:23:54 PM 533 Views
And it doesn't forbid content-neutral bans on funeral protests. Everyone wins. Ghavrel - 03/03/2011 08:53:20 AM 561 Views
Here's the problem Bad Ash - 03/03/2011 05:05:15 PM 601 Views
About time you came back, Shannon! Tashmere - 03/03/2011 11:42:39 PM 495 Views
Whoah, talk about jumping into the wayback machine! Avendesora - 04/03/2011 02:19:36 AM 558 Views
Fascinating that Alito should be the one to dissent. Legolas - 03/03/2011 10:35:05 PM 542 Views
I believe in siding with free speech but this one is hard random thoughts - 03/03/2011 10:58:04 PM 515 Views
No freaking kidding!!!! Exactly how I feel. Tashmere - 03/03/2011 11:38:54 PM 530 Views
Yes! *NM* @my - 04/03/2011 04:27:02 AM 224 Views
What a terrible ruling. The cliche is correct: interesting cases make for bad law. Tom - 04/03/2011 04:44:25 AM 507 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes