Active Users:368 Time:18/04/2025 08:33:09 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Fascinating that Alito should be the one to dissent. Legolas Send a noteboard - 03/03/2011 10:35:05 PM
As for the merits of the case, five million dollars is a ludicrous sum and symptomatic of everything that's wrong with the American justice system. But apart from that I'm inclined to side with Alito. It's beyond me why banning public sexual obscenity should be acceptable, while banning public obscenity of this nature isn't.
Reply to message
US Supreme Court allows anti-gay funeral protests everynametaken - 03/03/2011 04:55:52 AM 905 Views
Honestly... good. *NM* beetnemesis - 03/03/2011 04:59:21 AM 230 Views
Yeah ... Darth_Katie - 03/03/2011 03:23:54 PM 533 Views
And it doesn't forbid content-neutral bans on funeral protests. Everyone wins. Ghavrel - 03/03/2011 08:53:20 AM 561 Views
Here's the problem Bad Ash - 03/03/2011 05:05:15 PM 601 Views
About time you came back, Shannon! Tashmere - 03/03/2011 11:42:39 PM 495 Views
Whoah, talk about jumping into the wayback machine! Avendesora - 04/03/2011 02:19:36 AM 558 Views
Fascinating that Alito should be the one to dissent. Legolas - 03/03/2011 10:35:05 PM 543 Views
I believe in siding with free speech but this one is hard random thoughts - 03/03/2011 10:58:04 PM 515 Views
No freaking kidding!!!! Exactly how I feel. Tashmere - 03/03/2011 11:38:54 PM 530 Views
Yes! *NM* @my - 04/03/2011 04:27:02 AM 225 Views
What a terrible ruling. The cliche is correct: interesting cases make for bad law. Tom - 04/03/2011 04:44:25 AM 507 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes