Active Users:1102 Time:23/11/2024 12:59:27 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
the courts ruled a long time ago that the 1st amendment does not cover all speech random thoughts Send a noteboard - 28/02/2011 10:58:38 PM
You can't argue for rule of law only when you like the law. He used to children to make sexually explicit material and if a court rules that material to be porn then it is porn. I doubt he will receive the max penalty and until he does it is silly to argue about that. As for sex offender registry I think it is badly abused and needs to be reformed. There is no reason to believe he is a sexual predator and that should be required to place you on the list. I don't have a problem with him being barred from working with children though.
Reply to message
musician jailed over youtube prank -- faces 20+years plus child porn charges moondog - 20/02/2011 07:55:33 AM 1024 Views
Yay for home! MrFarstrider - 20/02/2011 12:20:14 PM 600 Views
Re: Yay for home! everynametaken - 22/02/2011 05:05:49 AM 573 Views
Mmmm, there is more to it . At first I was thinking it was much ado about nothing. Tashmere - 20/02/2011 03:31:51 PM 801 Views
This explains what happened better and lets me feel a little mercy for the guy. Tashmere - 20/02/2011 03:59:41 PM 839 Views
as stated, the children were never exposed to the "adult only" performance moondog - 20/02/2011 04:35:32 PM 601 Views
So I guess the moral of this story is think before you put things on the internet. *NM* Darth_Katie - 20/02/2011 06:10:32 PM 228 Views
He should get the pants sued off him. Ghavrel - 20/02/2011 07:08:56 PM 494 Views
His only mistake was not getting them to sign something, allowing to be posted on youtube A Deathwatch Guard - 21/02/2011 01:51:30 AM 577 Views
kids don't have that right. The parents would have needed to sign. *NM* random thoughts - 21/02/2011 07:24:04 PM 249 Views
The lyrics were hilarious? The sample I read and posted had nothing funny in them...maybe you can Tashmere - 22/02/2011 12:35:05 AM 479 Views
Well ... from this parents perspective dart_board - 21/02/2011 12:33:25 PM 567 Views
Lol and people say human beings aren't civilized *NM* Dark Knight - 21/02/2011 05:32:32 PM 230 Views
Re: Lol and people say human beings aren't civilized dart_board - 22/02/2011 02:19:48 PM 502 Views
Stupid and in bad taste, but certainly not worth jail time *NM* ironclad - 21/02/2011 12:41:28 PM 243 Views
For using the childrens' faces without permission he could be sued for monetary damages. Tom - 21/02/2011 01:50:19 PM 604 Views
Re: For using the childrens' faces without permission he could be sued for monetary damages. moondog - 21/02/2011 03:46:48 PM 594 Views
Tashmere's first reply above has a sample of the lyrics and how they were cut with the video. *NM* Sareitha Sedai - 21/02/2011 03:58:35 PM 216 Views
Agreed, that's really the only thing I can see that he can be sued for here. *NM* Legolas - 25/02/2011 10:36:53 PM 202 Views
"Oh, I didn't actually abuse any of those kids." Sareitha Sedai - 21/02/2011 02:37:00 PM 518 Views
Agreed. But being an asshat is not a crime. *NM* Ghavrel - 21/02/2011 05:02:59 PM 210 Views
No, it's not. Sareitha Sedai - 21/02/2011 05:22:05 PM 592 Views
no but using children to create sexually explicit material is random thoughts - 21/02/2011 07:36:32 PM 602 Views
"sexually explicit material" is different than "obscene" moondog - 22/02/2011 02:43:49 AM 543 Views
That is debatable. Tashmere - 22/02/2011 05:25:46 AM 507 Views
you don't believe both can describe language? random thoughts - 22/02/2011 02:30:16 PM 477 Views
Yes, this was disgusting, but since when does dirty lyrics = porn? Aeryn - 22/02/2011 04:18:05 PM 577 Views
The written word can be considered porn so why not song lyrics? random thoughts - 22/02/2011 05:04:37 PM 516 Views
It can? Aeryn - 23/02/2011 04:34:40 AM 608 Views
Yep Isaac - 23/02/2011 05:04:49 AM 566 Views
Actually, obscenity is one of the most poorly defined concepts in US law. Ghavrel - 26/02/2011 09:57:21 PM 653 Views
Yes, I've posted on the Miller Test Isaac - 26/02/2011 10:54:11 PM 709 Views
Penthouse letters is porn random thoughts - 24/02/2011 12:52:31 AM 497 Views
Am I the only one thinking of The Exorcist here? Legolas - 25/02/2011 10:40:58 PM 661 Views
yes you are the only one thinking that *NM* random thoughts - 25/02/2011 11:33:53 PM 202 Views
You gotta admit it doesn't get much worse than that in terms of exposing children to obscenity. Legolas - 26/02/2011 12:13:46 AM 507 Views
I need say I don't think he should go to prison for twenty years random thoughts - 26/02/2011 07:30:17 PM 543 Views
Yes that is a name Bramhodoulos - 21/02/2011 09:04:19 PM 668 Views
Inappropriate of course but child porn? Give me a break! *NM* everynametaken - 22/02/2011 05:06:20 AM 272 Views
defamation maybe Aeryn - 22/02/2011 04:21:03 PM 461 Views
Not sure if anyone else has asked this... Antigone - 25/02/2011 01:19:08 PM 768 Views
kids are video taped all the time at schools random thoughts - 25/02/2011 02:05:38 PM 462 Views
School staff is one thing, outside sources are another. Avendesora - 25/02/2011 02:56:20 PM 539 Views
most states run background checks and this guy may have had one run on him random thoughts - 25/02/2011 03:19:58 PM 550 Views
he got permission from the teacher and the kids' parents before the original filming session moondog - 25/02/2011 03:20:30 PM 566 Views
they probably didn't think he would it to make a "funny" video random thoughts - 26/02/2011 07:43:59 PM 651 Views
show one example the song was about sex with children and I might agree *NM* moondog - 26/02/2011 09:23:44 PM 235 Views
If you try hard enough you can believe whatever you want random thoughts - 26/02/2011 10:09:45 PM 561 Views
and if you're determined to railroad someone none of the facts matter moondog - 26/02/2011 11:36:42 PM 700 Views
If I put out a video that had you giggling as I sung about cumming on your face you would be fine? random thoughts - 27/02/2011 09:09:25 PM 486 Views
of course not, but the 1st amendment says you have the right moondog - 27/02/2011 11:02:42 PM 451 Views
the courts ruled a long time ago that the 1st amendment does not cover all speech random thoughts - 28/02/2011 10:58:38 PM 675 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes