School staff is one thing, outside sources are another.
Avendesora Send a noteboard - 25/02/2011 02:56:20 PM
They taped and photo graphed on a regular basis. Where do you think all the yearbook photos and graduation videos come from?
I don't know if this is true for every state, but I think most schools run people's fingerprints for a criminal history background check before they are hired.
*MySmiley*
I believe all news and research that supports my opinion, and dismiss the rest as conspiracy and lies.
I believe all news and research that supports my opinion, and dismiss the rest as conspiracy and lies.
musician jailed over youtube prank -- faces 20+years plus child porn charges
20/02/2011 07:55:33 AM
- 1024 Views
Mmmm, there is more to it . At first I was thinking it was much ado about nothing.
20/02/2011 03:31:51 PM
- 800 Views
This explains what happened better and lets me feel a little mercy for the guy.
20/02/2011 03:59:41 PM
- 839 Views
as stated, the children were never exposed to the "adult only" performance
20/02/2011 04:35:32 PM
- 601 Views
So I guess the moral of this story is think before you put things on the internet. *NM*
20/02/2011 06:10:32 PM
- 227 Views
His only mistake was not getting them to sign something, allowing to be posted on youtube
21/02/2011 01:51:30 AM
- 576 Views
kids don't have that right. The parents would have needed to sign. *NM*
21/02/2011 07:24:04 PM
- 248 Views
The lyrics were hilarious? The sample I read and posted had nothing funny in them...maybe you can
22/02/2011 12:35:05 AM
- 479 Views
Well ... from this parents perspective
21/02/2011 12:33:25 PM
- 566 Views
For using the childrens' faces without permission he could be sued for monetary damages.
21/02/2011 01:50:19 PM
- 603 Views
Re: For using the childrens' faces without permission he could be sued for monetary damages.
21/02/2011 03:46:48 PM
- 593 Views
Tashmere's first reply above has a sample of the lyrics and how they were cut with the video. *NM*
21/02/2011 03:58:35 PM
- 216 Views
Agreed, that's really the only thing I can see that he can be sued for here. *NM*
25/02/2011 10:36:53 PM
- 201 Views
"Oh, I didn't actually abuse any of those kids."
21/02/2011 02:37:00 PM
- 517 Views
Agreed. But being an asshat is not a crime. *NM*
21/02/2011 05:02:59 PM
- 210 Views
no but using children to create sexually explicit material is
21/02/2011 07:36:32 PM
- 601 Views
Yes, this was disgusting, but since when does dirty lyrics = porn?
22/02/2011 04:18:05 PM
- 576 Views
The written word can be considered porn so why not song lyrics?
22/02/2011 05:04:37 PM
- 515 Views
It can?
23/02/2011 04:34:40 AM
- 607 Views
Yep
23/02/2011 05:04:49 AM
- 565 Views
Actually, obscenity is one of the most poorly defined concepts in US law.
26/02/2011 09:57:21 PM
- 652 Views
Am I the only one thinking of The Exorcist here?
25/02/2011 10:40:58 PM
- 660 Views
yes you are the only one thinking that *NM*
25/02/2011 11:33:53 PM
- 201 Views
You gotta admit it doesn't get much worse than that in terms of exposing children to obscenity.
26/02/2011 12:13:46 AM
- 506 Views
Not sure if anyone else has asked this...
25/02/2011 01:19:08 PM
- 767 Views
kids are video taped all the time at schools
25/02/2011 02:05:38 PM
- 461 Views
School staff is one thing, outside sources are another.
25/02/2011 02:56:20 PM
- 539 Views
most states run background checks and this guy may have had one run on him
25/02/2011 03:19:58 PM
- 550 Views
he got permission from the teacher and the kids' parents before the original filming session
25/02/2011 03:20:30 PM
- 565 Views
they probably didn't think he would it to make a "funny" video
26/02/2011 07:43:59 PM
- 651 Views
show one example the song was about sex with children and I might agree *NM*
26/02/2011 09:23:44 PM
- 234 Views
If you try hard enough you can believe whatever you want
26/02/2011 10:09:45 PM
- 561 Views
and if you're determined to railroad someone none of the facts matter
26/02/2011 11:36:42 PM
- 699 Views
If I put out a video that had you giggling as I sung about cumming on your face you would be fine?
27/02/2011 09:09:25 PM
- 485 Views
of course not, but the 1st amendment says you have the right
27/02/2011 11:02:42 PM
- 450 Views
the courts ruled a long time ago that the 1st amendment does not cover all speech
28/02/2011 10:58:38 PM
- 674 Views