Active Users:496 Time:05/07/2025 05:41:25 PM
That sounds very like gnosticism in many ways. Joel Send a noteboard - 18/09/2009 12:17:51 PM
I'm not sure if there will ever be a scientific instrument that can measure this. But I think there is a hidden spiritual energy that animates all life and gives us access to greater powers than we can possibly know.

I've always believed that there were masters at various times in history who had partially or fully realized this truth. However, I also think there is a lower, opposing power that seeks to prevent us from being aware of the unity of man. That is why there are so many false spiritual prophets, negative acts by various religions, and so much gross materialism that denies the existence of a spirit.

We've probably all touched a tiny piece of the universal spirit at least once, whether it was through making love, praying, meditating, enjoying nature, seeing a birth or a death, creating something beautiful, or just having a plain Zen moment.

This is all just my personal belief, but I find great comfort in in having a viewpoint like this. I think the main thing that prevents us from realizing unity more continuously is our own stubborn egos. I have observed how insidious my own ego has can be, and it is definitely something I am trying to be more mindful of so that I live life more fully.

And Buddhism, in many ways; for all the popularity of accusing Christianity of appropriating Buddhist themes I think the charge is better made against the Gnostics (perhaps naturally, since in their purest forms both gnosticism and Buddhism are more philosophies than religions; Buddha discouraged inquiries about divinity on the same grounds as modern materialists: Even if it exists, it defies human investigation. ) And, no, no scientific measurement will ever be made of it, just as we'll never meet the soul of an atom; it's apples and oranges.

I would note, however, that one critical task of overcoming the ego is that just as we must each recognize we aren't preeminent as individuals, we must recognize humanity or even earthly life is not preeminent as a whole. If there is a true spiritual fundament to human and other life if possesses all of humanitys positive spiritual attributes as well as superior ones we lack; it must, to have both granted ours and created them and us to coexist in the first place. At that point, just as our duty to humanity is greater than that to ourselves, our duty to our Maker is greater than that to anyone else, individually or collectively. The nature of creation is such that typically takes the FORM of duty to our fellow lifeforms, but it's vital we never lose sight of our highest loyalty.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Do you think there's some kind of spiritual substance in the universe? - 14/09/2009 02:42:22 PM 910 Views
no, it is mostly hydrogen *NM* - 14/09/2009 02:43:47 PM 280 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 03:01:32 PM 259 Views
not a chance *NM* - 14/09/2009 03:23:02 PM 264 Views
yes (in as much that we could choose to define it that way) - 14/09/2009 03:31:40 PM 706 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 05:14:33 PM 264 Views
Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive? - 14/09/2009 05:27:09 PM 642 Views
Re: Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive? - 14/09/2009 06:20:45 PM 628 Views
I think there is definitely a spiritual force that underlies the unity of all things - 14/09/2009 06:11:01 PM 667 Views
That sounds very like gnosticism in many ways. - 18/09/2009 12:17:51 PM 676 Views
No. *NM* - 14/09/2009 07:06:59 PM 254 Views
define "spiritual'. - 14/09/2009 07:36:18 PM 596 Views
Rum. - 14/09/2009 08:25:46 PM 655 Views
YES! *NM* - 16/09/2009 02:10:55 PM 288 Views
How are we not married? *NM* - 19/09/2009 04:10:13 AM 263 Views
Bigamy laws. *NM* - 19/09/2009 03:49:59 PM 246 Views
My Achilles heel! *NM* - 19/09/2009 07:30:06 PM 268 Views
Timing *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:51:37 PM 265 Views
My Achilles ankle! *NM* - 21/09/2009 08:14:42 PM 275 Views
Your Face. *NM* - 21/09/2009 08:21:44 PM 264 Views
My Achilles face! - 07/10/2009 09:40:36 PM 550 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 09:09:16 PM 246 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 09:31:14 PM 264 Views
Yes, vodka. *NM* - 14/09/2009 10:02:19 PM 250 Views
Substance? - 14/09/2009 10:08:04 PM 612 Views
Yeah, boobs. - 15/09/2009 01:51:44 AM 604 Views
Not the way I'd put it, as jh notes, but unquestionably. - 15/09/2009 03:17:22 PM 635 Views
Look, don't put words in my mouth. - 15/09/2009 04:50:13 PM 658 Views
Sorry. - 15/09/2009 05:14:10 PM 590 Views
Re: Sorry. - 17/09/2009 09:20:58 PM 572 Views
People over-complicate this, it's a sort of animal abuse - 15/09/2009 09:03:01 PM 624 Views
Nicely put. *NM* - 17/09/2009 01:57:44 AM 244 Views
Very nicely put. *NM* - 17/09/2009 06:57:57 PM 238 Views
A sublte nuance most modern materialists miss. - 18/09/2009 12:21:33 PM 849 Views
I think there may be platonic forms defining purpose - 16/09/2009 06:27:36 AM 552 Views
The material universe precludes a purely natural cause. - 18/09/2009 12:04:16 PM 737 Views
One little correction - 20/09/2009 12:34:13 AM 723 Views
Nay. - 20/09/2009 07:04:47 AM 555 Views
Re: Nay. - 07/10/2009 11:55:28 AM 671 Views

Reply to Message