Active Users:1144 Time:23/11/2024 03:22:54 AM
Ultimately, Obama and Liebermans, for reasons I've stated at length and often. Joel Send a noteboard - 04/02/2011 11:54:35 PM
The Dems bent over backward trying to compromise on health care law, and all the GOP did was stick their fingers in their ears shouting "Hell No!" It got raped in sub-committee and finally the Dems just said "eff it" and pushed what they had through. They had the numbers to do that for a year before it happened.

And so we're left with a leftist law that doesn't go as far as it could have because the GOP was more interested in sabotage than compromise. Had the Dems just bullied from the beginning, it likely would have been a better law.

Oh well, live and learn.

Obama should've turned Reid lose to play hard ball with Lieberman, not forbidden him to strip the Republican in Democrats clothing of his committee chair. He completely tied Reids hands by telling him to give Lieberman whatever it took to get his vote on the healthcare bill; every time Reid gave in to "the last" demand a new one was made until the bill was completely gutted. No committee did that, Lieberman and Obama did, the former because he either decided to completely betray Dems on social as well as international policy or because his buddies in Hartford called in markers, and the latter because he was more interested in passing a bill--ANY bill--so he could claim victory than he was in providing real healthcare reform.

Yes, if Obama had simply used the overwhelming majority that elected him and the 70% approval ratings he enjoyed his first months of office instead of trying to suck up to people who never voted for him and never will we wouldn't be in this mess (also if he'd gone right after healthcare instead of wasting time with a Wall Street and real estate bailout that squandered much of his popular despite Republicans being too frightened of 70% approval to take it on). He could've also taken the time during his many public appearancs on behalf of the bill to cite specific policy goals he wanted, instead of just vaguely assuring the public that he was deeply committed to some form of one of the four healthcare bills in Congress at the time, but then he'd have had to go on the record and take a stand instead of making general optimistic promises. That he chose a failed strategy is not the GOPs fault by any means though, it's his. Even then we could've gotten a decent bill if he'd thrown out that travesty and forced a public debate over what the new law should and shouldn't have; that would've quickly exposed the GOP commitment to no more "reform" than attacking patients liability rights and protecting big insurance companies, but he was more interested in claiming victory than expanding healthcare, so that's what he did. Again, the buck stops at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, and, as I often said of Bush, if he didn't want the job he shouldn't have applied. Bottom line is it's not the other sides fault if the White House can't pass centerpiece legislation with whopping majorities in both houses of Congress.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Another judge rules ObamaCare unconstitutional - - 31/01/2011 10:57:24 PM 862 Views
I feel the need to set up a pool of some sort for when this goes to Supreme Court. - 01/02/2011 02:19:41 AM 591 Views
all are part? - 01/02/2011 02:47:32 AM 600 Views
Supreme Court Ruling are all or nothing, right? - 01/02/2011 06:49:17 AM 463 Views
Giving to NPR would be the same as giving to the democratic party. - 01/02/2011 11:55:57 AM 441 Views
Yeah but NPR's still good - 01/02/2011 02:09:48 PM 467 Views
that is why I still listen to it - 01/02/2011 04:47:04 PM 441 Views
The advantage would still be yours... - 01/02/2011 07:29:08 PM 428 Views
No - only parts of McCain/Feingold were declared unconstitutional..... - 01/02/2011 04:19:19 PM 525 Views
Split the difference? *NM* - 02/02/2011 12:17:34 AM 201 Views
A pool sound good, I call 5-4 to overturn! *NM* - 01/02/2011 04:15:40 AM 214 Views
The biggest problem with the healthcare law is that it IS a Dem law. - 01/02/2011 01:54:55 PM 445 Views
And whose fault is that? - 01/02/2011 07:39:58 PM 435 Views
yes it was the evil republicans *NM* - 01/02/2011 09:40:32 PM 229 Views
Not evil, just stubborn. *NM* - 02/02/2011 12:16:33 AM 221 Views
`unlike the easy going democrats? *NM* - 07/02/2011 03:59:41 PM 200 Views
Ultimately, Obama and Liebermans, for reasons I've stated at length and often. - 04/02/2011 11:54:35 PM 493 Views
Could you please explain to a confused Canadian... - 02/02/2011 02:40:09 AM 505 Views
Due to a well founded distrust in government..... - 02/02/2011 04:57:23 AM 1349 Views
huh...interesting... - 02/02/2011 05:22:05 AM 515 Views
They have heard how bad the Canadian system is? - 02/02/2011 08:21:24 AM 527 Views
No way to use any alternative? They banned private insurance and forced all docs to take insurance? - 05/02/2011 12:48:08 AM 504 Views
The alternative is to go to the U.S. - 05/02/2011 08:10:20 AM 645 Views
That's pretty asinine then, yes. - 05/02/2011 09:38:50 AM 527 Views
Re: That's pretty asinine then, yes. - 06/02/2011 07:55:43 AM 584 Views

Reply to Message