I think terrorizing innocents and torching buildings is a poor way to claim the moral highground.
Joel Send a noteboard - 29/01/2011 11:32:19 PM
Because here's a news flash for you: as far as regimes that one needs to revolt against go, the British rule over their colonies in the late eighteenth century was for all extents and purposes a walk in the park.
So you know, a "redress of grievances" will just see them in jail, and Egyptian cops aren't exactly gentle when they drag people off to jail.
So you know, a "redress of grievances" will just see them in jail, and Egyptian cops aren't exactly gentle when they drag people off to jail.
The reports at Bens link with people cowering in a hotel hoping protesters didn't get in and wondering where the cops were conjured images of the US embassy in Tehran ca. 1979. I'm not denying Mubarak and his state apparati are a bunch of thugs; note the subject line of my first post in this thread. What I'm saying is that if the "democratic" protesters include the same elements that murdered foreign tourists at the pyramids a few years ago and celebrated Christmas by blowing up a church less than a month ago it doesn't seem like democracy, except in the loosest sense, has a dog in this fight.
Democracy has to mean more than just lip service to free expression and accepting whatever got 51% in the last nominally free election, however reprehensible the victor may be. The one thing I've learned from observing US foreign relations both in my life time and historically is, as you've heard me say may times, that the trouble with free elections is: They're free. If civil rights, freedom of expression and personal safety being foremost, aren't respected people can "democratically" sanction anything from slavery to genocide, and the proof is how often majorities have done just that. It's their country and not our place to dictate to them; respect for self determination requires that as much as it requires free speech for ones own citizens, but if that's what's on the table, Mubaraks authoritarian regime preventing sectarian slaughter in the streets is preferable to a different authoritarian regime encouraging and choosing sides in it. That's the difference between peaceful protests and throwing Molotov cocktails at police.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
If anyone's looking for up-to-date info on what's going on in Egypt
28/01/2011 08:08:31 PM
- 622 Views
Clarify: Democracy fans should favor the protesters because they have more violent thugs,right?
28/01/2011 11:37:48 PM
- 472 Views
and socialism fans should favor the violent dicator since he can bring order and subsidies
29/01/2011 12:16:37 AM
- 341 Views
He mainly seems to bring close diplomatic ties to the US and alternatives to the Muslim Brotherhood
29/01/2011 12:59:48 AM
- 491 Views
You might want to do a quick check on the political situation in Egypt at this time.
29/01/2011 11:37:02 AM
- 406 Views
I've done a quick one; it makes me question whether government by the protesters would be better.
29/01/2011 11:44:10 PM
- 375 Views
It's a fairly simple matter, really.
29/01/2011 11:52:41 AM
- 414 Views
The trouble with free elections is: They're free.
29/01/2011 11:53:22 PM
- 325 Views
A vote for dictatorship and against democracy it is. Just checking.
30/01/2011 12:08:41 AM
- 366 Views
I haven't cast a vote.
30/01/2011 02:02:11 AM
- 345 Views
Not one that counts no, but still.
30/01/2011 01:11:59 PM
- 812 Views
None of any kind.
31/01/2011 12:10:07 AM
- 387 Views
so you support tyranny of others if it makes things more comfortable for you?
30/01/2011 05:15:01 AM
- 387 Views
I oppose brutal oppression; I'm unconvinced either side in this will end it, thus I withhold support
30/01/2011 05:21:37 AM
- 332 Views
some times it is black and white
31/01/2011 12:37:36 AM
- 330 Views
I fully support their right to demand democracy; I don't expect they'll get it, whatever happens.
31/01/2011 01:45:23 AM
- 527 Views
You're not seriously expecting them to do their revolution American Revolution-style, are you?
29/01/2011 11:28:31 AM
- 392 Views
I think terrorizing innocents and torching buildings is a poor way to claim the moral highground.
29/01/2011 11:32:19 PM
- 394 Views
British Colonialism wasn't a walk in the park
30/01/2011 03:53:58 AM
- 345 Views
Comparatively speaking, yes, it really was. Or at least in the US - not always so much in Asia.
30/01/2011 10:42:53 AM
- 336 Views
Re: Comparatively speaking, yes, it really was. Or at least in the US - not always so much in Asia.
30/01/2011 02:32:52 PM
- 390 Views
You can't be serious.
30/01/2011 03:07:18 PM
- 324 Views
Pretty serious
30/01/2011 04:52:24 PM
- 481 Views
Re: Pretty serious
30/01/2011 05:11:50 PM
- 374 Views
This is ridicolous
30/01/2011 05:31:31 PM
- 435 Views
I wouldn't normally think this necessary with you, but okay: let's go back and see what I said.
30/01/2011 06:34:09 PM
- 406 Views
you forget that it was supposdely thier own citizens the British were abusing.
31/01/2011 12:39:33 AM
- 429 Views
Sure, but organized into hostile armies. A rather different matter, that. *NM*
31/01/2011 09:46:25 PM
- 149 Views
I dont know if this will help you understand what is going on there
30/01/2011 02:45:41 AM
- 362 Views
Yikes indeed
29/01/2011 03:57:25 AM
- 387 Views
Apparently Egypt blocked access to Facebook, Twitter and some other websites.
29/01/2011 11:38:46 AM
- 346 Views
Heh, her update was basically "Thanks for turning facebook back on, Egypt."
29/01/2011 06:36:49 PM
- 305 Views
There seems to be some big misconceptions about the Egyption crisis
31/01/2011 11:52:37 PM
- 624 Views