Active Users:1204 Time:22/11/2024 07:36:45 PM
You seem to want to argue about what is allowed and what is not allowed... Shannow Send a noteboard - 27/01/2011 10:08:10 PM
Christian values only prohibit heterosexual sex OUTSIDE of marriage. Not within marriage. Where's the hypocrisy if you do exactly as your faith tells you to?

The hypocrisy is in making it possible for some people to use that way around the prohibition, and not for others. If "the temptations of the flesh" are perfectly fine when they happen within marriage, then they should be just as fine when they happen between those who would be married if they weren't arbitrarily denied the right to do so.


There is no argument. The rules are indeed arbitrary. That's the whole point.

One act is saved specifically for marriage. The other is prohibited altogether. Either accept it or don't follow that particular faith. Simple as that.
Reply to message
Ted Haggard Would Be Bisexual If He Was a Hot 21-Year-Old - 27/01/2011 05:01:12 PM 1256 Views
OK *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:10:10 PM 501 Views
Not sure what the point of this post was *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:50:59 PM 464 Views
It was something that made me laugh? - 27/01/2011 06:53:09 PM 775 Views
yeah you were only insulting people's religion, no reason to get worked up. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:24:55 PM 465 Views
Er, pretty sure just laughing at what one guy said, plus a pun on the word "hard" - 27/01/2011 09:40:29 PM 697 Views
I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 10:10:26 PM 760 Views
Re: I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 11:10:21 PM 740 Views
bullshit - 28/01/2011 03:54:41 PM 936 Views
Moron. *NM* - 29/01/2011 03:48:35 PM 427 Views
Well put. - 29/01/2011 04:48:00 PM 1054 Views
Or he'd still be closeted because of twisted, hateful strains of Christianity. *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:56:04 PM 373 Views
If your religion states homosexuality is wrong, then it is a position of principle... - 27/01/2011 06:59:04 PM 842 Views
Wow, you really don't understand what it is to be human - 27/01/2011 08:51:17 PM 700 Views
I'm sure you'll agree that a religious debate is not really called for here... - 27/01/2011 09:10:38 PM 790 Views
Homosexuality =/= homosexual sex. - 27/01/2011 09:16:50 PM 726 Views
Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:23:54 PM 960 Views
Re: Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:42:00 PM 911 Views
You seem to want to argue about what is allowed and what is not allowed... - 27/01/2011 10:08:10 PM 781 Views
So I am curious on your thoughts of Matthew 5:28 *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:30:50 PM 401 Views
What about it? - 28/01/2011 03:26:19 PM 806 Views
not really - 27/01/2011 10:15:32 PM 978 Views
I completely and utterly disagree - 27/01/2011 10:39:10 PM 717 Views
Replace "Christian Faith" with "hardcore Calvinism" and I'll go away. - 28/01/2011 12:35:36 AM 680 Views
Brush up on your Romans and Corinthians - 28/01/2011 03:30:24 PM 1104 Views
I think that covered it pretty well. - 27/01/2011 11:23:13 PM 843 Views
Is it possible to have faith, but not agree with your church's stance on subjects?. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:15:14 PM 425 Views
Of course. Faith is a broad concept. But... - 27/01/2011 09:20:54 PM 862 Views
Absolutely. - 27/01/2011 11:17:19 PM 649 Views
Nicely said *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:19:54 PM 427 Views
Agreed. - 28/01/2011 12:26:38 AM 692 Views
Re: Agreed. - 28/01/2011 01:48:22 AM 841 Views
Well, at least you're not disputing the nature of my claim. - 27/01/2011 10:23:24 PM 722 Views
I thought acceptance meant rejecting anything with which you're uncomfortable? - 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM 865 Views
Don't even know what that means. - 28/01/2011 12:31:23 AM 640 Views
Actually, that first line is my problem with Universalism - 28/01/2011 01:54:00 AM 833 Views
"Carnal flesh" is redundant, you know. - 28/01/2011 04:27:30 AM 717 Views
Point of emphasis. - 28/01/2011 05:52:28 AM 824 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 28/01/2011 06:33:55 AM 404 Views
...I can't believe of the three posts, this is the only one with replies - 27/01/2011 09:48:14 PM 637 Views
I read it, if that's any consolation. *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:00:31 PM 431 Views
It is nothing new, there are always people "who protest too much" - 27/01/2011 10:26:49 PM 678 Views
TAHT'S BECAUSE IT'S GAAAAAAAAAAAAY. *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:01:15 PM 441 Views
I thought that was quite humorous - 27/01/2011 11:38:31 PM 768 Views

Reply to Message