Active Users:1098 Time:22/11/2024 07:10:12 PM
I'm sure you'll agree that a religious debate is not really called for here... Shannow Send a noteboard - 27/01/2011 09:10:38 PM
Or else he believed in the principles, but was too weak to act according to them.

Humans can't will themselves to action, our brains aren't wired that way.


So I will merely say that a large part of the Christian faith focuses on exactly that - resisting the temptations of the flesh.
Reply to message
Ted Haggard Would Be Bisexual If He Was a Hot 21-Year-Old - 27/01/2011 05:01:12 PM 1256 Views
OK *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:10:10 PM 501 Views
Not sure what the point of this post was *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:50:59 PM 463 Views
It was something that made me laugh? - 27/01/2011 06:53:09 PM 775 Views
yeah you were only insulting people's religion, no reason to get worked up. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:24:55 PM 465 Views
Er, pretty sure just laughing at what one guy said, plus a pun on the word "hard" - 27/01/2011 09:40:29 PM 697 Views
I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 10:10:26 PM 760 Views
Re: I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 11:10:21 PM 740 Views
bullshit - 28/01/2011 03:54:41 PM 936 Views
Moron. *NM* - 29/01/2011 03:48:35 PM 427 Views
Well put. - 29/01/2011 04:48:00 PM 1054 Views
Or he'd still be closeted because of twisted, hateful strains of Christianity. *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:56:04 PM 373 Views
If your religion states homosexuality is wrong, then it is a position of principle... - 27/01/2011 06:59:04 PM 841 Views
Wow, you really don't understand what it is to be human - 27/01/2011 08:51:17 PM 700 Views
I'm sure you'll agree that a religious debate is not really called for here... - 27/01/2011 09:10:38 PM 790 Views
Homosexuality =/= homosexual sex. - 27/01/2011 09:16:50 PM 726 Views
Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:23:54 PM 960 Views
Re: Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:42:00 PM 911 Views
You seem to want to argue about what is allowed and what is not allowed... - 27/01/2011 10:08:10 PM 780 Views
So I am curious on your thoughts of Matthew 5:28 *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:30:50 PM 401 Views
What about it? - 28/01/2011 03:26:19 PM 805 Views
not really - 27/01/2011 10:15:32 PM 978 Views
I completely and utterly disagree - 27/01/2011 10:39:10 PM 717 Views
Replace "Christian Faith" with "hardcore Calvinism" and I'll go away. - 28/01/2011 12:35:36 AM 680 Views
Brush up on your Romans and Corinthians - 28/01/2011 03:30:24 PM 1104 Views
I think that covered it pretty well. - 27/01/2011 11:23:13 PM 843 Views
Is it possible to have faith, but not agree with your church's stance on subjects?. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:15:14 PM 425 Views
Of course. Faith is a broad concept. But... - 27/01/2011 09:20:54 PM 861 Views
Absolutely. - 27/01/2011 11:17:19 PM 649 Views
Nicely said *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:19:54 PM 427 Views
Agreed. - 28/01/2011 12:26:38 AM 692 Views
Re: Agreed. - 28/01/2011 01:48:22 AM 841 Views
Well, at least you're not disputing the nature of my claim. - 27/01/2011 10:23:24 PM 722 Views
I thought acceptance meant rejecting anything with which you're uncomfortable? - 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM 865 Views
Don't even know what that means. - 28/01/2011 12:31:23 AM 640 Views
Actually, that first line is my problem with Universalism - 28/01/2011 01:54:00 AM 833 Views
"Carnal flesh" is redundant, you know. - 28/01/2011 04:27:30 AM 717 Views
Point of emphasis. - 28/01/2011 05:52:28 AM 824 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 28/01/2011 06:33:55 AM 404 Views
...I can't believe of the three posts, this is the only one with replies - 27/01/2011 09:48:14 PM 637 Views
I read it, if that's any consolation. *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:00:31 PM 431 Views
It is nothing new, there are always people "who protest too much" - 27/01/2011 10:26:49 PM 678 Views
TAHT'S BECAUSE IT'S GAAAAAAAAAAAAY. *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:01:15 PM 441 Views
I thought that was quite humorous - 27/01/2011 11:38:31 PM 768 Views

Reply to Message