And because I'm not knowledgeable, for another.
That is a valid reason not to opine.
I am.
Fair enough, but in that case I'd likely be in trouble fast if I tried to debate it any length. Plus there may be little cause to do so; we don't seem to disagree as much as I initially thought.
If you were talking about what I think you were, however, bear in mind how often I've publicly said, regarding Americas immigration woes, that amnesty is a slap in the face to those who invest the time, money and energy to immigrate legally just because they aren't willing to introduce themselves to a new country with a criminal act. Then bear in mind that I coughed up $500 to get here, and succeeded in no small part due to indirect connections to an immigration lawyer who could literally explain the immigration laws to the woman who initially denied my visa (she actually thanked him for correcting her ignorance at one point. ) Further consider that it'll be at least a year before I can even apply for university, because I need some kind of residence permit first and can't even apply for one until two weeks after next falls admissions deadline. Also consider that in my NATIVE country, if someone returns home via deportation the State Dept. revokes their passport and they'll never get another. Ever.
Now consider that, from what I'm told, someone who entered the country illegally, ignorantly or not, was made aware of her illegal status yet obtained a masters degree from the state university before declaring herself an illegal immigrant via a book that's reportedly selling quite well, and STILL THINKS SHE SHOULD BE ABLE TO STAY! In looking over the local universitys admissions process I noted a warning that limited space makes it "highly competitive", thus for all the hypothetical abstractions about illegal aliens abusing the system at taxpayer expense in America, someone who'd otherwise have received a university education here was instead denied one because someone here illegally took their spot at a taxpayer funded university. The penalty for that is a trip to Moscow and expedited legal reentry as a resident, or a lifetime without a university degree and commensurately higher earnings, depending on whom you are. What kind of hypocrite would I be if I said this is OK? If I'D pulled that the US would never allow me to leave again, let alone return to Norway. Maybe I should write a book....
Remember: I WARNED you!
Now consider that, from what I'm told, someone who entered the country illegally, ignorantly or not, was made aware of her illegal status yet obtained a masters degree from the state university before declaring herself an illegal immigrant via a book that's reportedly selling quite well, and STILL THINKS SHE SHOULD BE ABLE TO STAY! In looking over the local universitys admissions process I noted a warning that limited space makes it "highly competitive", thus for all the hypothetical abstractions about illegal aliens abusing the system at taxpayer expense in America, someone who'd otherwise have received a university education here was instead denied one because someone here illegally took their spot at a taxpayer funded university. The penalty for that is a trip to Moscow and expedited legal reentry as a resident, or a lifetime without a university degree and commensurately higher earnings, depending on whom you are. What kind of hypocrite would I be if I said this is OK? If I'D pulled that the US would never allow me to leave again, let alone return to Norway. Maybe I should write a book....
Remember: I WARNED you!
Did you get the impression I was in favour of the popular point of view that her staying is unproblematic?
I did, yes; I mistook whom you were chiding, sorry.
I am not one to mindlessly follow the incoherent outrage of the masses, and I thought my comment made it clear that I found it bizarre that there is such a movement to make her stay while excluding others in a similar position.
But.
There is a difference between asylum and conventional immigration. You are doing the latter. She tried the former. Conflating them does nobody any good. And I will not pretend that the Norwegian bureaucracy is flawless in dealing with the legitimacy of asylum seekers. And being generally in favour of treating people as people, not as mindless "entities" that can be reduced to a statistic, I find our treatment of asylum seekers too restrictive.
(Ironically, this whole mass movement (as I indicated in my original reply) is due to people finally seeing a previous asylum seeker as precisely an individual, which I would like them to do in all cases.)
In this particular case, I do not have anywhere near enough information to take an unequivocal position. There are definite indications that the family was in serious danger, and that it was politically motivated, but that Norwegian immigration authorities failed to recognise that.
If so, that makes the staying illegally much more understandable, and I would much rather an illegal immigrant take a university education than turn to crime.
But.
There is a difference between asylum and conventional immigration. You are doing the latter. She tried the former. Conflating them does nobody any good. And I will not pretend that the Norwegian bureaucracy is flawless in dealing with the legitimacy of asylum seekers. And being generally in favour of treating people as people, not as mindless "entities" that can be reduced to a statistic, I find our treatment of asylum seekers too restrictive.
(Ironically, this whole mass movement (as I indicated in my original reply) is due to people finally seeing a previous asylum seeker as precisely an individual, which I would like them to do in all cases.)
In this particular case, I do not have anywhere near enough information to take an unequivocal position. There are definite indications that the family was in serious danger, and that it was politically motivated, but that Norwegian immigration authorities failed to recognise that.
If so, that makes the staying illegally much more understandable, and I would much rather an illegal immigrant take a university education than turn to crime.
Well, an illegal immigrant has already turned to crime if they remain in the country after learning of their illegal status, the moreso if they then obtain first a Bachelors and then a Masters degree at a university that requires students to be legal residents. I'm not unsympathetic here either, but if she sincerely felt as bad as claimed and genuinely wanted to do the right thing, "the right thing" would have been to go to the police, explain her situation and then seek asylum independently from her parents since they remained in the country with their minor child even after being refused asylum. Informing the authorties via a sensationalistic book then waiting for them to arrest her with the expectation allowing her to stay would be a mere formality seems a bit like political extortion: The fact there IS a "popular" view is no accident and, while I have no great love for UDI, in their place my reaction would probably have been something like "GTFO and STAY TFO!" If I broke into a jewelry store, cleaned it out and then wrote an exciting captivating novel about my exploits I wouldn't be too indignant or surprised that the cops who subsequently arrested me wouldn't let me keep the gems.
Now, you're quite right that asylum is different from other forms of immigration, and if there's a legitimate danger of political violence against her I think she ought to get asylum, though, as you note, she shouldn't get special treatment not accorded those who lack her public relations skills but are in precisely the same predicament. One difference is that while I'd never be allowed out of the US again if I was deported for being here illegally, it seems that asylum seekers are repatriated with a significant sum of cash, more than enough to travel to, say, Germany, or Britain, etc. and seek asylum there. A case of "you don't have to go home but you can't stay here". That seems a lot more ethical than simply using public opinion to bully the government into giving you what they refused to grant when you publicly proclaimed you'd been enjoying it for seven years. As it stands it sounds like she won't even have time to unpack before returning on a work permit, but while she may have "put a face" on the problem, most asylum seekers won't have the luxury of being a charismatic cause célèbre to let them circumvent the system. If you're a semi-literate 50 year old male refugee from Mogadishu... well, hopefully you have cute kids to put in front of the camera (makes me wonder where mom and dad are during this little media blitz).
So I guess the comparison to the American situation fits rather well if we bear in mind that political asylum IS a different thing than more standard immigration; I'm sympathetic in both cases, but the technical term for ignoring laws one deems inconvenient is "crime" and if the authorities decide to simply look the other way because a confessed criminal is likeable that's a tremendous slap in the face to all the people who ACTUALLY did the right thing and went through the proper legal channels AS WELL AS accepting the results of that. I mean, really, what kind of idiot would waste years of their life and large amounts of money on a process that very well might STILL fail when they could instead be living and working in the country illegally, secure in the knowledge that if they're ever caught the government will just retroactively rubber stamp their legal residence? Amnesties are a bad idea for the same reason the US won't let people leave the country again if it have to pay for their repatriation: Rewarding bad behavior only encourages it.
Whoever told you getting into the local university is hard was ... exaggerating. You pretty much only need to have passed high school.
Well, that's reassuring, thanks, but the person that told me admission to the local university is "highly competitive" was the admissions section of said universities website. Given how much harder than expected finding a job has been I'm inclined to take them at their word. I'm told they type of class makes a big difference, that as long as there's space left in a given course registering for it is no problem, but if there's more demand than supply then the competition begins. Something to ask our bridemaid about, me thinks (though any advice or info you have is certainly welcome), since I'll most likely be pursuing the degree she completed a year or so ago.
Still, ere I teach Norwegians my language and culture (and maybe the Brits, I guess, if it's necessary ) I suppose I should learn more of theirs.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 26/01/2011 at 10:24:40 AM
So the Irish government has basically imploded.
23/01/2011 04:47:10 PM
- 1530 Views
I am now confused
23/01/2011 05:34:31 PM
- 898 Views
You do realize Britain is pretty much the envy of the Western world at the moment?
23/01/2011 06:27:05 PM
- 951 Views
Re: You do realize Britain is pretty much the envy of the Western world at the moment?
23/01/2011 06:34:47 PM
- 874 Views
I did. There was more violence than in ours, that's true (ours have none so far, knock on wood).
23/01/2011 06:41:34 PM
- 854 Views
Re: I did. There was more violence than in ours, that's true (ours have none so far, knock on wood).
23/01/2011 06:43:41 PM
- 791 Views
Those protests were only violent by British standards.
23/01/2011 11:54:15 PM
- 861 Views
What protests?
24/01/2011 07:26:49 PM
- 894 Views
Re: What protests?
24/01/2011 07:28:40 PM
- 770 Views
Re: What protests?
25/01/2011 09:23:17 AM
- 895 Views
There's a new objection
25/01/2011 11:38:25 AM
- 832 Views
I didn't object...
25/01/2011 11:47:11 AM
- 720 Views
And Britain had to live with the Conservative Wilderness for 15 years before it could get there *NM*
24/01/2011 02:43:16 AM
- 430 Views
Should I start chiming in on Norwegian politics now that I'm here...?
24/01/2011 12:42:03 AM
- 721 Views
Why not?
24/01/2011 08:49:07 AM
- 859 Views
'Cos I doubt you'll like what I have to say, for one thing.
26/01/2011 01:55:13 AM
- 857 Views
Re: 'Cos I doubt you'll like what I have to say, for one thing.
26/01/2011 08:42:04 AM
- 915 Views
I misconstrued your sarcasm, sorry.
26/01/2011 10:23:40 AM
- 1059 Views
That's been a while coming, hasn't it? Cowen seems to be losing it.
23/01/2011 05:48:30 PM
- 839 Views
Certainly. he's been on dodgy ground for a couple months.
23/01/2011 06:27:27 PM
- 902 Views
Re: Certainly. he's been on dodgy ground for a couple months.
23/01/2011 06:33:26 PM
- 854 Views
Re: Certainly. he's been on dodgy ground for a couple months.
23/01/2011 07:19:03 PM
- 948 Views
Re: Certainly. he's been on dodgy ground for a couple months.
23/01/2011 07:57:05 PM
- 808 Views
Re: Certainly. he's been on dodgy ground for a couple months.
23/01/2011 09:29:03 PM
- 907 Views
Re: Certainly. he's been on dodgy ground for a couple months.
23/01/2011 09:46:20 PM
- 866 Views
I think Adams is an Irish citizen, and not a British one.
23/01/2011 11:45:34 PM
- 823 Views
I found out something else today which makes it even better.
24/01/2011 10:37:45 PM
- 979 Views
I was reading your post and going "what about the Chiltern Hundreds"?
24/01/2011 10:44:32 PM
- 831 Views
Oh, alternatively we could elevate him to the House of Lords.
26/01/2011 11:08:44 PM
- 841 Views
Awesome idea. Something like "Baron Adams of Londonderry", I'm thinking. *NM*
27/01/2011 07:54:26 PM
- 416 Views
We made his arch-rival a Lord, after all, so it would only be fair.
28/01/2011 08:26:15 AM
- 777 Views
Here you go
25/01/2011 12:55:33 PM
- 921 Views
well, the only interesting thing in swedish politics is a wikileaks document and the reactions...
23/01/2011 06:21:00 PM
- 899 Views
What is inappropriate about trying to keep out barbaric unskilled people?
23/01/2011 10:59:53 PM
- 852 Views
The inappropriateness is the generalisation in the claim
23/01/2011 11:16:52 PM
- 830 Views
Generalizations are inappropriate when they are disproven by statistics, and appropriate when proven
24/01/2011 07:33:14 PM
- 786 Views
I've looked into the statistics a bit more.
24/01/2011 09:11:52 PM
- 804 Views
I take it you're talking about the Middle East in its most narrow sense here.
24/01/2011 09:56:22 PM
- 847 Views
... the fact that they are asylum seekers, and their skill certainly shouldn't matter in that case.
24/01/2011 07:08:14 PM
- 733 Views
Hopefully they'll stop using Irish officially as a way to cut down on unnecessary costs.
23/01/2011 10:57:08 PM
- 776 Views
I'd support that
23/01/2011 11:26:20 PM
- 848 Views
Ironically, if you de-officialised Irish you could get EU money to help preserve it.
23/01/2011 11:48:14 PM
- 758 Views
But why, why?
24/01/2011 08:35:43 PM
- 744 Views
Because it's the only thing justifying their insistence they're not British?
24/01/2011 10:03:54 PM
- 796 Views
But all language learning should be purely voluntary (after what parents teach their children).
25/01/2011 03:05:28 AM
- 779 Views
What, so you don't think students in high school should be taught foreign languages?
25/01/2011 06:34:21 PM
- 750 Views
Irish is the mother tongue of about 7,000-15,000 people at most.
26/01/2011 05:04:00 AM
- 821 Views
Wikipedia says it's more like 40k-80k.
26/01/2011 06:41:41 PM
- 1193 Views
And Elaine, Stephen, or any other Irish people here: do feel free to comment. *NM*
26/01/2011 06:42:36 PM
- 433 Views
More to the point, are YOU interested in learning Irish?
26/01/2011 05:15:18 AM
- 729 Views
Calling Ireland the new Sodom and Gomorrah, are you?
26/01/2011 06:02:05 PM
- 890 Views
I don't think it's as fun as Sodom and Gomorrah, at least not post-crisis.
26/01/2011 09:48:54 PM
- 851 Views
Re: I don't think it's as fun as Sodom and Gomorrah, at least not post-crisis.
27/01/2011 08:42:21 PM
- 708 Views
Presumably because they agree with J.R.R. Tolkien and Tómas Sæmundsson about language's importance.
24/01/2011 10:16:05 PM
- 890 Views
So Australians and New Zealanders are really English then? Austrians are just Germans?
25/01/2011 03:01:14 AM
- 851 Views
I never said I agreed .
25/01/2011 08:19:11 AM
- 822 Views
I would suggest that a distinct dialect does the job just as well
25/01/2011 02:23:59 PM
- 835 Views
The thing is, people who feel really strongly about that usually insist it's a separate language.
28/01/2011 04:20:57 PM
- 699 Views
It's really more about having a unique silly costume to wear at Miss Universe pageants.
26/01/2011 05:09:10 AM
- 689 Views
You're confusing what we sell to gullible American tourists with what we actually value . *NM*
28/01/2011 04:15:01 PM
- 368 Views
What the hell happened to the Celtic Tiger Country? *NM*
24/01/2011 05:47:12 AM
- 465 Views
The Celtic Tiger is dead, Ireland had a GDP contraction of 14% in the last two years.
24/01/2011 01:47:06 PM
- 801 Views
It's still there, but it aimed a bit too high and got a bit scorched.
24/01/2011 10:07:36 PM
- 677 Views