Active Users:344 Time:08/04/2025 11:38:48 PM
Do you have an example of a credible threat of injury to a Congressman, or calls for one? Joel Send a noteboard - 20/01/2011 10:02:53 PM
You claimed that some law enforcement agency would step in if implied threats were made against a congressman. I pointed out that again you are wrong and gave you an example to prove it. You try and change the subject.

If so, implied or not, I highly recommend reporting it to the Secret Service, FBI and/or AT LEAST the DC police; about the only way you could prove your argument is if they all say, "stop overreacting, we're not going to waste our time with that". My bet is they'd say, "we'll check it out... " because it would be a PR nightmare if they didn't and something like this happened. Such threats are dangerous and have no legal free speech protection (IIRC such threats against ANYONE are actually a crime in themselves). If it's just "I know people at Kos do it all the time, even though I can't recall any examples, so accept my objective unbiased view of it" that means very little. Frankly, I think a lot of folks at Kos quite capable of it and that's one of many reasons I have nothing to do with them. That's more an argument such threats from them SHOULD be investigated by SOMEONE rather than ignored, but you aren't going to prove the latter is what happened because you can't prove a negative and I'm won't ask you to try.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 16/01/2011 12:18:22 PM 2073 Views
Why are they calling it "blood libel"? - 16/01/2011 12:23:47 PM 926 Views
Because if the facts were as they represent them those words would be applicable. - 16/01/2011 12:49:22 PM 1105 Views
It's not entirely clear to me whether you're aware of this or not, but... - 16/01/2011 01:12:22 PM 1151 Views
That's why I said, "popularized". - 16/01/2011 01:46:52 PM 1093 Views
I think Alan Dershowitz dealt with this nonsense already - 16/01/2011 02:34:10 PM 1460 Views
Interesting. I didn't realize it was so wide-spread. - 16/01/2011 03:10:28 PM 1003 Views
She wasn't even the first to use the term that week either - 16/01/2011 10:10:35 PM 1021 Views
I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 10:18:54 PM 1017 Views
Re: I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 11:30:38 PM 932 Views
Oh please don't you start to - 17/01/2011 02:34:43 PM 875 Views
I for one hadn't noticed it before. - 17/01/2011 10:25:57 PM 1060 Views
it was used here and nobody commented - 17/01/2011 10:37:07 PM 942 Views
LOL, I totally forgot that got posted here - 17/01/2011 10:54:26 PM 992 Views
It's funny you should say that... - 18/01/2011 10:32:59 PM 1029 Views
Re: It's funny you should say that... - 19/01/2011 03:29:52 PM 1010 Views
It was permissible to ignore until it became a rallying cry. - 20/01/2011 04:27:23 PM 1049 Views
A rallying cry is hardly illegal - 20/01/2011 05:32:45 PM 1093 Views
I never said it was. - 20/01/2011 06:59:39 PM 1190 Views
Oh, I noticed that one alright. - 18/01/2011 10:25:23 PM 869 Views
compared to the way similar terms are used? - 19/01/2011 06:58:02 PM 1013 Views
I meant I hadn't seen it used in different contexts before. - 19/01/2011 07:35:00 PM 993 Views
Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 10:24:09 PM 1078 Views
Re: Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 11:09:21 PM 1111 Views
Again, Giffords specifically made the connection between Palins imagery and an attack on her. - 17/01/2011 12:53:08 AM 1257 Views
That means precisely nothing - 17/01/2011 03:59:07 PM 946 Views
It means everything. - 18/01/2011 08:34:55 PM 1208 Views
I'm trying to understand your logic - 19/01/2011 12:50:28 AM 818 Views
There are two points: - 19/01/2011 02:47:48 AM 1020 Views
Re: It means everything. - 19/01/2011 05:55:02 PM 843 Views
That's simply illogical. - 20/01/2011 01:08:51 AM 1228 Views
the old step one steal underwear step three profit argument - 19/01/2011 06:01:14 PM 1100 Views
that is some twisted and bizarre logic - 17/01/2011 02:38:41 PM 1046 Views
So I am a little confused on something... - 16/01/2011 02:38:59 PM 1095 Views
Palin putting Giffords district in the crosshairs and Giffords implying at the time she feared this - 16/01/2011 11:21:36 PM 1231 Views
If I understand what you are saying correctly... - 17/01/2011 07:07:56 AM 975 Views
I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 08:33:47 AM 984 Views
Re: I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 04:24:01 PM 1046 Views
The Secret Service does guard Congressmen, just not all of them automatically. - 18/01/2011 09:13:39 PM 861 Views
No, they don't - 18/01/2011 10:19:34 PM 1057 Views
Really? Cannoli says differently, and I believe he's right on that one. - 18/01/2011 10:50:51 PM 1137 Views
You seem to be reading what you want to from what I said - 19/01/2011 01:27:32 PM 991 Views
I read what you said & understood it as you restate here, hence I referenced local police (twice) - 20/01/2011 02:15:17 AM 1025 Views
The problem here is your ignoring normal policing powers to concoct an absurdity - 20/01/2011 04:20:25 PM 1084 Views
More absurd than the notion such incitement warrants no notice? - 20/01/2011 05:42:47 PM 1109 Views
really because people post that kind of crap daily and nothing happens - 20/01/2011 05:57:52 PM 938 Views
I thought waterboarding was OK and any suggestion to the contrary was terrorist sympathizing. - 20/01/2011 07:54:05 PM 873 Views
way to dodge the point again - 20/01/2011 08:34:33 PM 901 Views
Do you have an example of a credible threat of injury to a Congressman, or calls for one? - 20/01/2011 10:02:53 PM 974 Views
Your shifting your original premise, *again* - 20/01/2011 08:24:18 PM 956 Views
No, you're simply missing the point of it. - 20/01/2011 11:09:57 PM 974 Views
There is no point - 21/01/2011 12:22:30 AM 1002 Views
If I had no point I wouldn't bother, but fair enough. - 21/01/2011 01:20:32 AM 1251 Views
Uh...Last I checked conservatives didn't list the Communist Manifesto as a favourite book. - 16/01/2011 03:05:07 PM 1264 Views
You're awesome at missing points, aren't you? - 16/01/2011 07:26:30 PM 1016 Views
where is the accountability for those committing slander? - 17/01/2011 02:52:40 PM 936 Views
Libs hate Mein Kampf and We the Living; conservatives hate the Communist Manifesto: He's neither. - 16/01/2011 10:06:02 PM 964 Views
conseartives hate Mein Kampf and liberals stil read the Communist Manifesto - 17/01/2011 02:57:22 PM 953 Views
That first line is says it all. - 18/01/2011 09:34:06 PM 1034 Views
Nazis had more in common with communist then capitalist - 19/01/2011 04:10:09 PM 1144 Views
The founder of fascism called it "the merger of corporate and national power". - 20/01/2011 02:51:09 AM 1027 Views
and that is supposed to mean something? - 20/01/2011 06:06:18 PM 1031 Views
YOU are cherry picking. - 20/01/2011 07:50:21 PM 967 Views
It is to be expected that this site would be libtard central... - 16/01/2011 05:23:53 PM 1236 Views
See my reply to Dragonsoul above. - 16/01/2011 07:30:40 PM 1078 Views
Yeah, your first was better - 16/01/2011 09:48:58 PM 894 Views
Palin didn't really have anything to do with this, but it makes sense she's blamed. - 16/01/2011 10:19:51 PM 956 Views
Pretty much. - 16/01/2011 11:44:35 PM 1038 Views
Did they ever catch the person(s) that vandalized Gifford's office? *NM* - 17/01/2011 03:30:36 AM 476 Views
politcal offices are vandalized on a regular basis *NM* - 17/01/2011 02:41:29 PM 445 Views
She only asked if they caught the guy, she didn't accuse anyone, Sarah. - 18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM 924 Views
OK Olberman when did I imply otherwise? *NM* - 19/01/2011 02:48:41 PM 485 Views
"Political offices are vandalized on a regular basis". - 20/01/2011 03:16:39 AM 1114 Views
Took you this long, huh? - 17/01/2011 01:53:31 PM 870 Views
I am sick of the desperate attempts of liberals to find a way to use a tragedy - 17/01/2011 02:31:18 PM 899 Views
I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:23:47 PM 863 Views
Re: I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:28:04 PM 1009 Views
I always said I'd do that after Bush was re-elected. - 18/01/2011 11:52:45 PM 887 Views
like I said a matter of faith - 17/01/2011 04:27:51 PM 876 Views
I find it interesting... - 17/01/2011 05:31:54 PM 1026 Views
I mention her looks solely because... - 20/01/2011 02:30:42 PM 913 Views
If slander, not mine, Giffords' (at least you don't err like Palin and say, "libel" ). - 18/01/2011 11:14:23 PM 1083 Views
mark you calendar today is the day Joel offically went around the bend into insanity - 19/01/2011 05:28:06 PM 898 Views
A mirror will show me who's to blame? On whom have I put a crosshairs? - 20/01/2011 03:23:43 AM 937 Views
so it is all a matter of faith for you - 20/01/2011 05:48:44 AM 892 Views
No, it's fairly straight forward logic. - 20/01/2011 03:25:56 PM 997 Views
sorry Joel but you haven't - 20/01/2011 03:29:49 PM 802 Views
It's there; in this thread alone people from both sides of the aisle have acknowledged that. - 20/01/2011 05:51:21 PM 886 Views
only in your does the connection exisit - 20/01/2011 06:39:35 PM 929 Views
No. - 20/01/2011 07:35:09 PM 1006 Views
dude wake up - 20/01/2011 08:54:33 PM 1142 Views
So in your opinion... - 17/01/2011 05:27:58 PM 881 Views
How 'bout simply color coding them? - 18/01/2011 11:21:03 PM 926 Views
Why not just blame Giffords? - 17/01/2011 06:07:14 PM 1222 Views
Indeed, why not; Sarah Palin does. - 18/01/2011 06:58:01 PM 1055 Views
The irony of this thread is not lost on me. - 19/01/2011 04:09:01 PM 1067 Views
Exactly. *NM* - 19/01/2011 04:51:40 PM 527 Views
Bizarre thread for that Soapbox - 19/01/2011 05:17:58 PM 811 Views
You missed the point, obviously. - 19/01/2011 06:04:23 PM 918 Views
so you are saying it is the same old RAFO - 19/01/2011 06:47:24 PM 989 Views
The thread has admittedly degenerated - 19/01/2011 07:02:12 PM 842 Views
Check your NB. Noted you a response. *NM* - 19/01/2011 07:04:58 PM 511 Views
That I knew it would go this way is why I avoided looking closely for so long. - 19/01/2011 11:20:44 PM 1073 Views
Hey, now. I have to step in. - 20/01/2011 04:44:49 PM 1096 Views
I'm just saying a significant link can be demonstrated. - 20/01/2011 07:07:27 PM 1142 Views
Re: OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 22/01/2011 05:49:44 PM 1082 Views

Reply to Message