I read Toms reply; I don't think he exactly vindicated your position, nor meant to do so. - Edit 1
Before modification by Joel at 20/01/2011 01:53:06 AM
Sorry you argument has no weight for multiple reasons.
First your entire "blaming the victim" argument is complete BS. Blaming the victim is when you blame someone for being a victim and imply they brought it on themselves. Look at Tom's reply and you will get a better understanding of what blaming the victim looks like.
First your entire "blaming the victim" argument is complete BS. Blaming the victim is when you blame someone for being a victim and imply they brought it on themselves. Look at Tom's reply and you will get a better understanding of what blaming the victim looks like.
Of course, so long as words mean what you choose them to mean it makes sense you'd see it that way, but given what Loughners reported to have said, it's ironic.
Second, Gifford claiming that there would be consequences does not some how magically become valid because of an unrelated incident. You little leap in logic that because she said makes any attacks on the lefties trying use this to attack the right is an attack Gifford really fails. Sorry.
You should be; since I can only guess at that last sentences meaning I won't try to respond.
Third, the left needs to either shut the fuck up with all the bullshit whining about hate filled rhetoric or stop all of their own hate filled rhetoric because crying like a bunch of scared little girls while they attack none stop is both tiring and pathetic. They are either to stupid to see what they are doing are they are stupid enough to think the rest of us won’t notice either way it is loser strategy and pafrt of the reason why they accomplish so little beyond leading a few sheep around by the nose. One little taste of liberals in power and the conservatives have their best election ever.
How I wish the Dems were liberal, but that's beside the point (tangents are MY bailiwick, but I'm trying to stay on topic, really). Strong rhetoric is one thing, but incindiary dehumanizing rhetoric filled with violent imagery is dangerous, and I sincerely hope you're not so naïve you think Loughner was oblivious or unsympathetic to the literal interpretations of that. Yes, it's just as bad from the left and I do condemn it just as strongly; you used to make jabs about me visiting Kos and I'd retort that I do no such thing: This is one reason why. Loughner is an antigovernment nut, and while only one side of the political spectrum has "antigovernment" as a PLATFORM PLANK (but he's CLEARLY a liberal
) if McCain had won the election Loughners twisted mind could easily have taken Kos' rhetoric as a call to murder. Ultimately, this isn't about left vs. right, it's about demagoguery vs. sanity, because the former is manifestly dangerous to all political persuasions. I'm truly sorry if being "right" (in every sense) is more important to you than that.